期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
基于水泥-地聚合物公路隧道衬砌裂缝修复试验研究
1
作者 韩颖异 崔达 《公路交通科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第5期118-124,共7页
为了研究地聚合物材料对隧道衬砌裂缝的修补效果和影响因素,通过隧道衬砌裂缝诊断与处治模拟平台开展裂缝修补试验研究。根据公路隧道马蹄形断面衬砌受力特点,平台通过两个拱形钢架来模拟衬砌轮廓形状并通过钢架绕铰支座转动实现裂缝修... 为了研究地聚合物材料对隧道衬砌裂缝的修补效果和影响因素,通过隧道衬砌裂缝诊断与处治模拟平台开展裂缝修补试验研究。根据公路隧道马蹄形断面衬砌受力特点,平台通过两个拱形钢架来模拟衬砌轮廓形状并通过钢架绕铰支座转动实现裂缝修补截面非均布张拉的受力形态。基于该平台分别开展稳定状态、发展状态、不同渗漏水状态下的裂缝修补试验,并通过张开应力和张开后截面浆液分布形态来评价纯地聚合物、纯水泥砂浆、水泥+地聚合物3种材料的实际修补效果,分析不同材料组合、衬砌裂缝状态、以及渗水量对修补效果的影响并给出相关工程建议。结果表明:水泥作为一种碱激发剂能与地聚合物材料发生反应,水泥+地聚合物的裂缝修补效果要优于纯水泥砂浆或纯地聚合物。水泥+地聚合物组合材料的裂缝修补效果随张开加载速率增大而减弱,加载速率30 N/h工况下的黏结张拉应力为10 N/h工况下的46%,仅为无张力工况下的40%,建议衬砌裂缝基本稳定后再开展修补工作。水泥+地聚合物组合材料的修补效果随裂缝位置渗漏量增大而减弱,渗水状态(1 mL/min)对修补效果影响相对较小,7 d和28 d时的修补效果分别降低22%和19%,可直接进行裂缝修补;涌水状态下(20 mL/min)7 d和28 d时的修补效果分别降低42%和38%,不宜直接进行修补。 展开更多
关键词 隧道工程 裂缝修补 裂缝诊治平台 水泥-地聚合物 衬砌裂缝
下载PDF
Utilization of Concrete Waste Aggregates Using Geopolymer Cement 被引量:1
2
作者 Sotya Astutiningsih Henki Wibowo Ashadi +2 位作者 Hendra Widhatra Kresnadya Desha Rousstia Maria Elizabeth Suryatriyastuti 《Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture》 2010年第6期11-15,共5页
Reuse of concrete waste, especially in large quantity, can save not only material but also cost for its disposal. This paper presents experiment results on the use of fine and coarse aggregates from concrete waste in ... Reuse of concrete waste, especially in large quantity, can save not only material but also cost for its disposal. This paper presents experiment results on the use of fine and coarse aggregates from concrete waste in geopolymer mortars and concretes. Geopolymeric cement is an inorganic compounds of aluminosilicates synthesized from precursors with high content of silica and alumina activated by alkali silicate solutions. Geopolymer in this experiment was synthesized from fly ash as the precursor and sodium silicate solution as the activator. Hardening of geopolymers was performed by heating the casted paste in an oven at -60~Cfor 3 to 36 hours. Compressive strength of geopolymer pastes and mortars using either fresh or waste fine aggregates were in the range of 19-26 MPa. Hardening time of 3 hours at 60~C followed by leaving the test pieces at room temperature for 7 day before testing results in similar strength to that of mortars cured for 36 hours at 60~C followed by leaving the samples at room temperature for 3 days. It suggests that optimum strength can be achieved by combination of heating time and rest period before testing, i.e the specimens age. Applying mix design with a target strength of 40 MPa, conventional Portland cement concretes using fresh aggregates reached 70% of its target strength at day-7. Compressive strength of geopolymer concretes with waste aggregates was -25 MPa at day-3 while geopolymer concretes with fresh aggregates achieved -39 MPa at day-3. It can be concluded that geopolymer concretes can achieve the target strength in only 3 days. However, the expected reinforcing effect of coarse aggregates in concrete was ineffective if waste coarse aggregates were used as the strength of the concretes did not increase significantly from that of the mortars. On the other hand, waste fine aggregates can be reused for making geopolymer mortars having the same strength as the geopolymer mortars using fresh aggregates. 展开更多
关键词 GEOPOLYMER concrete waste aggregates MORTAR CONCRETE compressive strength.
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部