期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
云南省长江流域水资源变化特征分析 被引量:4
1
作者 谷桂华 段路松 +1 位作者 余守龙 李学辉 《人民长江》 北大核心 2019年第A01期86-89,共4页
云南位于长江上游,是长江上游重要的生态安全屏障,流域水资源为推动长江经济带保护与发展提供基础资源保障。基于全国第三次水资源调查评价成果,利用数理统计法、滑动平均法、M ann-Kendall秩次相关法和累积距平法,分析了云南省境内长... 云南位于长江上游,是长江上游重要的生态安全屏障,流域水资源为推动长江经济带保护与发展提供基础资源保障。基于全国第三次水资源调查评价成果,利用数理统计法、滑动平均法、M ann-Kendall秩次相关法和累积距平法,分析了云南省境内长江流域的降水、蒸发、径流的变化特征和趋势。分析结果表明:①1956~2016年降水和径流多年平均分别为957.3 mm和377.4 mm,Cv值分别为0.10和0.19,年内分配极为不均,汛期/全年分别为88.8%和76.0%,历年降水与径流过程对应;②降水和径流深最大的是宜宾至宜昌干流区,降水最小的是赤水河,径流深最小的是石鼓以下干流;③降水和径流变化均为不显著减少,系列过程都存在跳跃性,降水过程跳跃点为2003年和2008年,径流过程跳跃点为2008年;④汛期和枯季降水系列变化分别为不显著减少和增加,汛期降水系列跳跃点为2008年,枯季降水系列无显著跳跃;⑤1980~2016年蒸发多年平均为1 173.7 mm,Cv值为0.07,金沙江干热河谷区多年平均年蒸发量达1 784.5 mm,年最大蒸发量超过2 000 mm,变化趋势为显著减少,系列过程跳跃点为1997年;流域水资源的变化主要受气候因子影响。研究成果可为长江流域水资源管理提供基础依据,也可为长江经济带建设提供水资源基础参考。 展开更多
关键词 水资源变化特征 第三次水资源调查评价 数理统计法 滑动平均法 累积距平法 云南省 长江流域
下载PDF
Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Disturbance of Land Use Change on Major Ecosystem Function Zones in China 被引量:8
2
作者 NING Jia LIU Jiyuan ZHAO Guosong 《Chinese Geographical Science》 SCIE CSCD 2015年第5期523-536,共14页
In recent years, because of increasing human activities, ecosystems have been substantially disturbed and their service functions have been greatly compromised. Based on the effect of land use changes on the major eco... In recent years, because of increasing human activities, ecosystems have been substantially disturbed and their service functions have been greatly compromised. Based on the effect of land use changes on the major ecosystem services, we estimated the ecosystem comprehensive anthropogenic disturbance index(ECADI) and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics of changes in the ECADI in China from 1990 to 2010. The average ECADI of the major ecosystem function zones in China in 2010 is approximately 0.382. The ECADI of Northeast China and North China is slightly higher than that of Northwest China and Southwest China. Most zones have slight changes in the ECADI. The average increases of ECADI in the major ecosystem function zones in China from 1990 to 2000 and from 2000 to 2010 are 0.0024 and 0.0002, respectively. The increase is mainly due to reclamation and urbanization, whereas the decrease is due to the implementation of ecosystem protection policies. During the last 20 years, the ECADI of water resources conservation zones increased first, and then stopped. The ECADI of soil conservation zones increased first, and then declined. The ECADI of sandstorm prevention zones, biodiversity conservation zones and flooding mitigation zones increased continuously. Our results may provide proposals to the government regarding land use planning and ecosystem protection plans in the major ecosystem zones. The major ecosystem function zones in the western part of China have been protected effectively. However, the major ecosystem function zones in the eastern part of China require more protection in the future. 展开更多
关键词 land use change major ecosystems services DISTURBANCE spatiotemporal patterns China
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部