Fresno县农村运输局（FCRTA）、圣华金谷空气污染控制区（SJVAPCD）、加州运输部（Caltrans）、加州能源委员会（CEC）和CALSTART发布了一项在Fresno全县13个农村综合城镇中提供Envision Solar EV ARC太阳能供电的电动车充电站计划,这...Fresno县农村运输局（FCRTA）、圣华金谷空气污染控制区（SJVAPCD）、加州运输部（Caltrans）、加州能源委员会（CEC）和CALSTART发布了一项在Fresno全县13个农村综合城镇中提供Envision Solar EV ARC太阳能供电的电动车充电站计划,这是在该县的最大的太阳能供电电动车充电站的单一部署,并且是第一个在一个单一的县里将所有农村城镇连接起来。FCRTA选择Envision Solar公司的EV ARC产品。展开更多
Ground level ozone pollution has become a significant air pollution problem in Beijing. Because of the complex way in which ozone is formed, it is difficult for policy makers to identify optimal control options on a c...Ground level ozone pollution has become a significant air pollution problem in Beijing. Because of the complex way in which ozone is formed, it is difficult for policy makers to identify optimal control options on a cost-effective basis. This paper identi-fies and assesses a range of options for addressing this problem. We apply the Ambient Least Cost Model and compare the eco-nomic costs of control options, then recommend the most effective sequence to realize pollution control at the lowest cost. The study finds that installing of Stage II gasoline vapor recovery system at Beijing's 1446 gasoline stations would be the most cost-effective option. Overall, options to reduce ozone pollution by cutting ve-hicular emissions are much more cost-effective than options to "clean up" coal-fired power plants.展开更多
文摘Fresno县农村运输局（FCRTA）、圣华金谷空气污染控制区（SJVAPCD）、加州运输部（Caltrans）、加州能源委员会（CEC）和CALSTART发布了一项在Fresno全县13个农村综合城镇中提供Envision Solar EV ARC太阳能供电的电动车充电站计划,这是在该县的最大的太阳能供电电动车充电站的单一部署,并且是第一个在一个单一的县里将所有农村城镇连接起来。FCRTA选择Envision Solar公司的EV ARC产品。
基金supported by the Economyand Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA)Beijing Science and Technology Commission (GrantNo.D09040903670905)+1 种基金Study on the Regional Air PollutionControl Strategy and PolicyShanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science and Technology Development Foundation
文摘Ground level ozone pollution has become a significant air pollution problem in Beijing. Because of the complex way in which ozone is formed, it is difficult for policy makers to identify optimal control options on a cost-effective basis. This paper identi-fies and assesses a range of options for addressing this problem. We apply the Ambient Least Cost Model and compare the eco-nomic costs of control options, then recommend the most effective sequence to realize pollution control at the lowest cost. The study finds that installing of Stage II gasoline vapor recovery system at Beijing's 1446 gasoline stations would be the most cost-effective option. Overall, options to reduce ozone pollution by cutting ve-hicular emissions are much more cost-effective than options to "clean up" coal-fired power plants.
