期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
虚拟仪器技术赋能《汽车评估学》课程教学改革
1
作者 贺焕利 陈杜奥 《教育进展》 2023年第9期7156-7162,共7页
针对目前《汽车评估学》课程教学中存在的问题,将虚拟仪器技术引入课程教学过程中,具体阐述了如何将虚拟仪器技术引入教学设计,帮助学生直观了解并掌握汽车价值评估的方法及原理。通过对已授课的往年三届学生展开教学效果调研,调研结果... 针对目前《汽车评估学》课程教学中存在的问题,将虚拟仪器技术引入课程教学过程中,具体阐述了如何将虚拟仪器技术引入教学设计,帮助学生直观了解并掌握汽车价值评估的方法及原理。通过对已授课的往年三届学生展开教学效果调研,调研结果表明这种教学方法行之有效,教学效果良好。 展开更多
关键词 汽车评估学 虚拟仪器技术 LABVIEW 改革
下载PDF
思政教育融入《汽车评估学》课程的教学探究
2
作者 贺焕利 《教育进展》 2023年第10期7848-7852,共5页
课程思政教育是“立德树人”的重要抓手,在高等学校教学改革中占据非常重要的地位。本文结合《汽车评估学》的课程特点及教学过程中存在的亟待解决的问题,剖析了本课程进行课程思政建设的必要性,重新构建课程教学的组织架构,确立教学和... 课程思政教育是“立德树人”的重要抓手,在高等学校教学改革中占据非常重要的地位。本文结合《汽车评估学》的课程特点及教学过程中存在的亟待解决的问题,剖析了本课程进行课程思政建设的必要性,重新构建课程教学的组织架构,确立教学和思政目标、挖掘思政教学内容,对“课程思政”教育融入课程教学的途径及方法进行探究,多角度的教学改革助力课程思政建设,落实立德树人根本任务。 展开更多
关键词 汽车评估学 课程思政 方法设计 汽车服务工程
下载PDF
Evaluation of differences in injury patterns according to seat position in trauma victims survived traffic accidents
3
作者 Yaakov Daskal Ricardo Alfici +4 位作者 Adi Givon Kobi Peleg Oded Olsha Boris Kessel Israel Trauma Group 《Chinese Journal of Traumatology》 CAS CSCD 2018年第5期273-276,共4页
Purpose: Investigation of injury patterns epidemiology among car occupants may help to develop different therapeutic approach according to the seat position. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare differenc... Purpose: Investigation of injury patterns epidemiology among car occupants may help to develop different therapeutic approach according to the seat position. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare differences in the incidence of serious injuries, between occupants in different locations in private cars. Methods: A retrospective study including trauma patients who were involved in motor vehicle accidents and admitted alive to 20 hospitals (6 level I trauma centers and 14 level II trauma centers). We examined the incidence of injures with abbreviated injury score 3 and more, and compared their occurrence be- tween seat locations. Results: The study included 28,653 trauma patients, drivers account for 60.8% (17,417). Front passenger mortality was 0.47% higher than in drivers. Rear seat passengers were at greater risk (10.26%) for trau- matic brain injuries than front seat passengers (7.48%) and drivers (7.01%). Drivers are less likely to suffer from serious abdominal injuries (3.84%) compared to the passengers (front passengers - 5.91%, rear passengers - 5.46%). Conclusion: Out of victims who arrived alive to the hospital, highest mortality was found in front seat passengers. The rate of serious chest injuries was higher as well. Rear seat passengers are at greater risk for serious traumatic brain injuries. All passengers have a greater incidence of abdominal injuries. These findings need to be addressed in order to develop "customized" therapeutic policy in trauma victims. 展开更多
关键词 Traffic accidents Injury pattern Seat position
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部