Pegylated interferon α (IFNα) in combination with ribavirin is currently recommended as a standard-of-care treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This combination therapy has drastically improved t...Pegylated interferon α (IFNα) in combination with ribavirin is currently recommended as a standard-of-care treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This combination therapy has drastically improved the rate of sustained virological response, specifically in difficult-to-treat patients. Recently, individualized treatment, such as response-guided therapy, is being developed based on host-, HCV- and treatment-related factors. Furthermore, modified regimens with currently available medications, novel modified IFNα and ribavirin or combinations with specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV agents, are currently being investigated. The purpose of this review is to address some issues and epoch-making topics in the treatment of chronic HCV infection, and to discuss more optimal and highly individualized therapeutic strategies for HCV-infected patients.展开更多
Over the last decade, the standard of care for the treat- ment of chronic hepatitis C has been the combination of pegylated-interferon-alfa （PEG-IFN） and ribavirin （RBV） which results in sustained virological resp...Over the last decade, the standard of care for the treat- ment of chronic hepatitis C has been the combination of pegylated-interferon-alfa （PEG-IFN） and ribavirin （RBV） which results in sustained virological response （SVR） rates of 75%-85% in patients with genotypes 2 or 3 but only of 40%-50% in patients with genotype 1. Cur- rently, there are rapid and continuous developments of numerous new agents against hepatitis C virus （HCV）, which are the focus of this review. Boceprevir and tela- previr, two first-generation NS3/4A HCV protease inhibi- tors, have been recently licensed in several countries around the world to be used in combination with PEG- IFN and RBV for the treatment of genotype 1 patients. Boceprevir or telaprevir based triple regimens, com- pared with the PEG-IFN/RBV combination, improve the SVR rates by 25%-31% in treatment-naTve genotype 1 patients, by 40%-64% in prior relapsers, by 33%-45% in prior partial responders and by 24%-28% in prior null responders. At the same time, the application of response-guided treatment algorithms according to the on-treatment virological response results in shortening of the total therapy duration to only 24 wk in 45%-55% of treatment-na＇ive patients. There are, however, several challenges with the use of the new triple combinations in genotype 1 patients, such as the need for immediate results of HCV RNA testing using sensitive quantitative assays, new and more frequent adverse events （anemia and dysgeusia for boceprevir; pruritus, rash and anemia for telaprevir）, new drug interactions and increasing dif- ficulties in compliance. Moreover, the SVR rates are still poor in very difficult to treat subgroups of genotype 1 patients, such as null responders with cirrhosis, while there is no benefit for patients who cannot tolerate PEG- IFN/RBV or who are infected with non-1 HCV genotype. Many newer anti-HCV agents of different classes and numerous combinations are currently under evaluation with encouraging results. Preliminary data suggest that the treatment of chronic HCV patients with well toler- ated combinations of oral agents without PEG-IFN is feasible and may lead to a universal HCV cure over the next 5-10 years.展开更多
AIM： To investigate the use of high dose consensusinterferon in combination with ribavirin in former iv drug users infected with hepatitis C. METHODS： We started, before pegylated （PEG）interferons were available, ...AIM： To investigate the use of high dose consensusinterferon in combination with ribavirin in former iv drug users infected with hepatitis C. METHODS： We started, before pegylated （PEG）interferons were available, an open-label study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of high dose induction therapy with consensus interferon （CIFN） and ribavirin in treatment of naiive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Fifty-eight patients who were former iv drug users, were enrolled receiving 18 μg of CIFN daily for 8 wk, followed by 9 μg daily for up to wk 24 or 48 and 800 mg of ribavirin daily. End point of the study was tolerability and eradication of the virus at wk 48 and sustained virological response at wk 72. RESULTS： More than 62% of patients responded to the treatment with CIFN at wk 24 or 48, respectively, showing a negative qualitative PCR [genotype 1 fourteen patients （56%）, genotype 2 five （50%）, genotype 3 thirteen （87%）, genotype 4 four （50%）]. Forty-eight percent of genotype 1 patients showed sustained virological response （SVR） six months after the treatment. CONCLUSION： CIFN on a daily basis is well tolerated and side effects like leuko- and thrombocytopenia are moderate. End of therapy （EOT） rates are slightly lower than the newer standard therapy with pegylated interferons. CIFN on a daily basis might be a favourable therapy regimen for patients with GTI and high viral load or for non-responders after failure of standard therapy.展开更多
More than 170 million people worldwide have chronic hepatitis C. Acute hepatitis C is rarely diagnosed because it is commonly asymptomatic. Most infected patients are unaware of their condition until the symptoms of c...More than 170 million people worldwide have chronic hepatitis C. Acute hepatitis C is rarely diagnosed because it is commonly asymptomatic. Most infected patients are unaware of their condition until the symptoms of chronic infection manifest. Treatment of acute hepatitis C is something of a paradox because spontaneous resolution is possible and many patients do not have symptoms. However, several factors provide a rationale for treating patients who have acute hepatitis C. Compared with acute hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis C is associated with a worse prognosis, the need for more intensive treatment, longer treatment duration, and a decrease in successful treatment outcomes. Conversely, early intervention is associated with improved viral eradication, using a regimen that is better tolerated, less expensive, more convenient, and of shorter duration than the currently approved combination therapies for chronic hepatitis C.展开更多
Infection with hepatitis C virus （HCV） affects approximately 170 million people worldwide. However, no vaccine or immunoglobulin is currently available for the prevention of HCV infection. The standard of care （SOC...Infection with hepatitis C virus （HCV） affects approximately 170 million people worldwide. However, no vaccine or immunoglobulin is currently available for the prevention of HCV infection. The standard of care （SOC） involving pegylated interferon-（] （PEG-IFN a） plus ribavirin （RBV） for 48 weeks results in a sustained virologic re- sponse in less than 50% of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1, the most prevalent type of HCV in North America and Europe. Recently, reliable in vitro culture systems have been developed for accelerating antiviral therapy research, and many new specifically targeted antiviral therapies for hepatitis C （STAT-C） and treatment strategies are being evaluated in clinical trials. These new antiviral agents are expected to improve present treatment significantly and may potentially shorten treatment duration. The aim of this review is to summarize the current developments in new anti-HCV drugs.展开更多
文摘Pegylated interferon α (IFNα) in combination with ribavirin is currently recommended as a standard-of-care treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This combination therapy has drastically improved the rate of sustained virological response, specifically in difficult-to-treat patients. Recently, individualized treatment, such as response-guided therapy, is being developed based on host-, HCV- and treatment-related factors. Furthermore, modified regimens with currently available medications, novel modified IFNα and ribavirin or combinations with specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV agents, are currently being investigated. The purpose of this review is to address some issues and epoch-making topics in the treatment of chronic HCV infection, and to discuss more optimal and highly individualized therapeutic strategies for HCV-infected patients.
文摘Over the last decade, the standard of care for the treat- ment of chronic hepatitis C has been the combination of pegylated-interferon-alfa （PEG-IFN） and ribavirin （RBV） which results in sustained virological response （SVR） rates of 75%-85% in patients with genotypes 2 or 3 but only of 40%-50% in patients with genotype 1. Cur- rently, there are rapid and continuous developments of numerous new agents against hepatitis C virus （HCV）, which are the focus of this review. Boceprevir and tela- previr, two first-generation NS3/4A HCV protease inhibi- tors, have been recently licensed in several countries around the world to be used in combination with PEG- IFN and RBV for the treatment of genotype 1 patients. Boceprevir or telaprevir based triple regimens, com- pared with the PEG-IFN/RBV combination, improve the SVR rates by 25%-31% in treatment-naTve genotype 1 patients, by 40%-64% in prior relapsers, by 33%-45% in prior partial responders and by 24%-28% in prior null responders. At the same time, the application of response-guided treatment algorithms according to the on-treatment virological response results in shortening of the total therapy duration to only 24 wk in 45%-55% of treatment-na＇ive patients. There are, however, several challenges with the use of the new triple combinations in genotype 1 patients, such as the need for immediate results of HCV RNA testing using sensitive quantitative assays, new and more frequent adverse events （anemia and dysgeusia for boceprevir; pruritus, rash and anemia for telaprevir）, new drug interactions and increasing dif- ficulties in compliance. Moreover, the SVR rates are still poor in very difficult to treat subgroups of genotype 1 patients, such as null responders with cirrhosis, while there is no benefit for patients who cannot tolerate PEG- IFN/RBV or who are infected with non-1 HCV genotype. Many newer anti-HCV agents of different classes and numerous combinations are currently under evaluation with encouraging results. Preliminary data suggest that the treatment of chronic HCV patients with well toler- ated combinations of oral agents without PEG-IFN is feasible and may lead to a universal HCV cure over the next 5-10 years.
文摘AIM： To investigate the use of high dose consensusinterferon in combination with ribavirin in former iv drug users infected with hepatitis C. METHODS： We started, before pegylated （PEG）interferons were available, an open-label study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of high dose induction therapy with consensus interferon （CIFN） and ribavirin in treatment of naiive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Fifty-eight patients who were former iv drug users, were enrolled receiving 18 μg of CIFN daily for 8 wk, followed by 9 μg daily for up to wk 24 or 48 and 800 mg of ribavirin daily. End point of the study was tolerability and eradication of the virus at wk 48 and sustained virological response at wk 72. RESULTS： More than 62% of patients responded to the treatment with CIFN at wk 24 or 48, respectively, showing a negative qualitative PCR [genotype 1 fourteen patients （56%）, genotype 2 five （50%）, genotype 3 thirteen （87%）, genotype 4 four （50%）]. Forty-eight percent of genotype 1 patients showed sustained virological response （SVR） six months after the treatment. CONCLUSION： CIFN on a daily basis is well tolerated and side effects like leuko- and thrombocytopenia are moderate. End of therapy （EOT） rates are slightly lower than the newer standard therapy with pegylated interferons. CIFN on a daily basis might be a favourable therapy regimen for patients with GTI and high viral load or for non-responders after failure of standard therapy.
文摘More than 170 million people worldwide have chronic hepatitis C. Acute hepatitis C is rarely diagnosed because it is commonly asymptomatic. Most infected patients are unaware of their condition until the symptoms of chronic infection manifest. Treatment of acute hepatitis C is something of a paradox because spontaneous resolution is possible and many patients do not have symptoms. However, several factors provide a rationale for treating patients who have acute hepatitis C. Compared with acute hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis C is associated with a worse prognosis, the need for more intensive treatment, longer treatment duration, and a decrease in successful treatment outcomes. Conversely, early intervention is associated with improved viral eradication, using a regimen that is better tolerated, less expensive, more convenient, and of shorter duration than the currently approved combination therapies for chronic hepatitis C.
基金Project partially supported by the Centers for Oceans and Human Health Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (No.P50ES012740)the National Science Foundation of USA (Nos.OCE04-32479 and OCE09-11000)the National Mega Project on Major Drug Development of China (No.2011ZX09401-302)
文摘Infection with hepatitis C virus （HCV） affects approximately 170 million people worldwide. However, no vaccine or immunoglobulin is currently available for the prevention of HCV infection. The standard of care （SOC） involving pegylated interferon-（] （PEG-IFN a） plus ribavirin （RBV） for 48 weeks results in a sustained virologic re- sponse in less than 50% of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1, the most prevalent type of HCV in North America and Europe. Recently, reliable in vitro culture systems have been developed for accelerating antiviral therapy research, and many new specifically targeted antiviral therapies for hepatitis C （STAT-C） and treatment strategies are being evaluated in clinical trials. These new antiviral agents are expected to improve present treatment significantly and may potentially shorten treatment duration. The aim of this review is to summarize the current developments in new anti-HCV drugs.
