Father Joseph-Adrien Lelarge de Lignac was born in Poitiers （France） in the year 1697. He died in Paris in 1762. In 1731, he was ordained priest and he became an oratorian the following year. His Letters to an Ameri...Father Joseph-Adrien Lelarge de Lignac was born in Poitiers （France） in the year 1697. He died in Paris in 1762. In 1731, he was ordained priest and he became an oratorian the following year. His Letters to an American is an attempt to refute Buffon and Condillac; this book was prepared in collaboration with Rraumur （J. Roger, P. Charbonnat）. Here, we present some elements of the correspondence between Lignac and Rraumur which show a scientific dialogue about 1736-1748 and we try to bring some foundations of the thought of Lignac to light. Between empiricism and ontology, Lignac stands up for scientific questions being subject to literal reading of the Bible. But Lignac is also the first one to perceive a way of thinking in Buffon Natural History （T. Hoquet）. According to him, the thought of Buffon is a deviation in an order of knowledge, because Natural History would especially be based on observation and experiment. So in this paper, we emphasize two original sources in the thought of Father de Lignac： Malebranche philosophy and his collaboration with Reaumur.展开更多
After China＇s entry into ＂ The World Structure,＂ the legal philosophy of China, in its redefinition of ＂China＂ and its survey of ＂China＇s issues,＂ must construct a ＂relational perspective. ＂ From this relati...After China＇s entry into ＂ The World Structure,＂ the legal philosophy of China, in its redefinition of ＂China＂ and its survey of ＂China＇s issues,＂ must construct a ＂relational perspective. ＂ From this relational perspective, ＂The World Structure＂ in an age of globalization presents a dualistic character, and closely related to this is the fact that ＂ The World Structure＂ forces double constraints upon the development of China. Under these double constraints, China＇s issues become ＂synchronic. ＂ This ＂World Structure,＂ with its double constraints, turns out to be the historic condition of the fundamentcd tasks of the legal philosophy of China and it calls for a redefinition of China by the legal philosophy of China via the construction of the ＂relational perspective＂ and the ＂synchronic perspective＂ and at the same time, a ＂Subjective China＂ is to be constructed, upon which China＇s ideal law picture can also be perfected.展开更多
文摘Father Joseph-Adrien Lelarge de Lignac was born in Poitiers （France） in the year 1697. He died in Paris in 1762. In 1731, he was ordained priest and he became an oratorian the following year. His Letters to an American is an attempt to refute Buffon and Condillac; this book was prepared in collaboration with Rraumur （J. Roger, P. Charbonnat）. Here, we present some elements of the correspondence between Lignac and Rraumur which show a scientific dialogue about 1736-1748 and we try to bring some foundations of the thought of Lignac to light. Between empiricism and ontology, Lignac stands up for scientific questions being subject to literal reading of the Bible. But Lignac is also the first one to perceive a way of thinking in Buffon Natural History （T. Hoquet）. According to him, the thought of Buffon is a deviation in an order of knowledge, because Natural History would especially be based on observation and experiment. So in this paper, we emphasize two original sources in the thought of Father de Lignac： Malebranche philosophy and his collaboration with Reaumur.
文摘After China＇s entry into ＂ The World Structure,＂ the legal philosophy of China, in its redefinition of ＂China＂ and its survey of ＂China＇s issues,＂ must construct a ＂relational perspective. ＂ From this relational perspective, ＂The World Structure＂ in an age of globalization presents a dualistic character, and closely related to this is the fact that ＂ The World Structure＂ forces double constraints upon the development of China. Under these double constraints, China＇s issues become ＂synchronic. ＂ This ＂World Structure,＂ with its double constraints, turns out to be the historic condition of the fundamentcd tasks of the legal philosophy of China and it calls for a redefinition of China by the legal philosophy of China via the construction of the ＂relational perspective＂ and the ＂synchronic perspective＂ and at the same time, a ＂Subjective China＂ is to be constructed, upon which China＇s ideal law picture can also be perfected.
