Under the current system and theory of civil procedure law of our country, the preservation is limited to property, i. e. the preservation on property. However,it has been proved by practice that the preservation on p...Under the current system and theory of civil procedure law of our country, the preservation is limited to property, i. e. the preservation on property. However,it has been proved by practice that the preservation on property does not embrace all kinds of preservation needed. In maritime trial, action has been considered to be a new subject of preservation, and such a preservation may be named as the preservation of non-property. lt is different from the preservation on property of execution in advance. Under such a system,maritime court may order the defendant to take certain action or forbid him to take certain action upon the claimant’s application. The establishment of the system of preservation on non-property will be significant in theory and improve the system of preservation both in maritime and civil trial in our展开更多
对物诉讼,如从语义学角度来分析,显然是一种针对物的诉讼,即把物作为诉讼法律关系的当事一方,即诉讼法律关系主体的一种诉讼。对物诉讼作为一种诉讼类型已存在多年。罗马法即曾按起诉书的内容,将诉讼分成对人诉讼(actio in personam)和...对物诉讼,如从语义学角度来分析,显然是一种针对物的诉讼,即把物作为诉讼法律关系的当事一方,即诉讼法律关系主体的一种诉讼。对物诉讼作为一种诉讼类型已存在多年。罗马法即曾按起诉书的内容,将诉讼分成对人诉讼(actio in personam)和对物诉讼(actio in rem),以及补充性的“混合诉讼”(actio mixta)。对物诉讼为涉及所有权的诉讼,对人诉讼为涉及合同的诉讼,而介于两者之间,兼有对人诉讼与对物诉讼性质的则为混合诉讼。英国法除有普通法诉讼与衡平法诉讼之分外,亦将诉讼分为对人诉讼与对物诉讼。尽管大陆法与英国法皆有对物诉讼制度,对物诉讼并非为英国法所独享,但却以英国法的对物诉讼制度发展最为完善,影响最为广泛。而这其中又以英国海事案件的对物诉讼最为经常普遍,英国海事对物诉讼则又大多是针对船舶的诉讼。正因为如此,在当今,对物诉讼这一概念的外延已十分有限。一般来说,其特指英国“针对”船舶的海事对物诉讼,本文正是在这一意义上使用“对物诉讼”这一概念的。因此除本段的特别说明外,本文的对物诉讼仅指英国以船舶为“对象”的海事对物诉讼。对于对物诉讼,无论所“对”何物,我国理论界向持一种排斥态度,认为它有悖学理、不合逻辑。本文试图在已有成果的基础上对英国以船舶为“对象”的?展开更多
运用比较研究的方法,对美国海事扣押令(Rule B Attachment)制度与中国的海事请求保全制度在性质、目的、程序、要件等制度设计方面进行了比较,总结出两种制度各自的特点,对不同之处简要分析其原因,以期在完善中国海事请求保全制度方面...运用比较研究的方法,对美国海事扣押令(Rule B Attachment)制度与中国的海事请求保全制度在性质、目的、程序、要件等制度设计方面进行了比较,总结出两种制度各自的特点,对不同之处简要分析其原因,以期在完善中国海事请求保全制度方面有所裨益。展开更多
There are some similarities between property secutity and security of maritime claim. Nevertheless, they are different in nature.This article tries to make difference between property security and security of maritime...There are some similarities between property secutity and security of maritime claim. Nevertheless, they are different in nature.This article tries to make difference between property security and security of maritime claim by discussing the following factors: subject of right, the court that accept and hear the case,the conditions for and aim of property security,the method taken and time chosen in the procedure, the target to be secured, limitation of claims and the order in satisfying the compensation.展开更多
海事诉讼具有很强的对物诉讼性,英美法系非常具有特色的对物诉讼制度就是从海事诉讼中发展起来的。尽管在英美法系以外的国家并没有这么鲜明的对物诉讼制度,而与此相关联的扣船制度却分别为各国海事诉讼制度所采用。然而,作为海事请求...海事诉讼具有很强的对物诉讼性,英美法系非常具有特色的对物诉讼制度就是从海事诉讼中发展起来的。尽管在英美法系以外的国家并没有这么鲜明的对物诉讼制度,而与此相关联的扣船制度却分别为各国海事诉讼制度所采用。然而,作为海事请求保全最典型形式的扣船制度,其在两大法系国家法律中的规定也有明显的差别;英美法系的扣押船舶是对物诉讼中的一个重要环节,而在大陆法系扣船只是财产保全的一种方式。以我国海事请求保全制度与美国Rule B Attachment制度为例,现对其概念特征、起源发展、及具体制度进行分析比较,以期对海事请求保全制度能有一个更新、更全面的认识。展开更多
文摘Under the current system and theory of civil procedure law of our country, the preservation is limited to property, i. e. the preservation on property. However,it has been proved by practice that the preservation on property does not embrace all kinds of preservation needed. In maritime trial, action has been considered to be a new subject of preservation, and such a preservation may be named as the preservation of non-property. lt is different from the preservation on property of execution in advance. Under such a system,maritime court may order the defendant to take certain action or forbid him to take certain action upon the claimant’s application. The establishment of the system of preservation on non-property will be significant in theory and improve the system of preservation both in maritime and civil trial in our
文摘对物诉讼,如从语义学角度来分析,显然是一种针对物的诉讼,即把物作为诉讼法律关系的当事一方,即诉讼法律关系主体的一种诉讼。对物诉讼作为一种诉讼类型已存在多年。罗马法即曾按起诉书的内容,将诉讼分成对人诉讼(actio in personam)和对物诉讼(actio in rem),以及补充性的“混合诉讼”(actio mixta)。对物诉讼为涉及所有权的诉讼,对人诉讼为涉及合同的诉讼,而介于两者之间,兼有对人诉讼与对物诉讼性质的则为混合诉讼。英国法除有普通法诉讼与衡平法诉讼之分外,亦将诉讼分为对人诉讼与对物诉讼。尽管大陆法与英国法皆有对物诉讼制度,对物诉讼并非为英国法所独享,但却以英国法的对物诉讼制度发展最为完善,影响最为广泛。而这其中又以英国海事案件的对物诉讼最为经常普遍,英国海事对物诉讼则又大多是针对船舶的诉讼。正因为如此,在当今,对物诉讼这一概念的外延已十分有限。一般来说,其特指英国“针对”船舶的海事对物诉讼,本文正是在这一意义上使用“对物诉讼”这一概念的。因此除本段的特别说明外,本文的对物诉讼仅指英国以船舶为“对象”的海事对物诉讼。对于对物诉讼,无论所“对”何物,我国理论界向持一种排斥态度,认为它有悖学理、不合逻辑。本文试图在已有成果的基础上对英国以船舶为“对象”的?
文摘There are some similarities between property secutity and security of maritime claim. Nevertheless, they are different in nature.This article tries to make difference between property security and security of maritime claim by discussing the following factors: subject of right, the court that accept and hear the case,the conditions for and aim of property security,the method taken and time chosen in the procedure, the target to be secured, limitation of claims and the order in satisfying the compensation.
文摘海事诉讼具有很强的对物诉讼性,英美法系非常具有特色的对物诉讼制度就是从海事诉讼中发展起来的。尽管在英美法系以外的国家并没有这么鲜明的对物诉讼制度,而与此相关联的扣船制度却分别为各国海事诉讼制度所采用。然而,作为海事请求保全最典型形式的扣船制度,其在两大法系国家法律中的规定也有明显的差别;英美法系的扣押船舶是对物诉讼中的一个重要环节,而在大陆法系扣船只是财产保全的一种方式。以我国海事请求保全制度与美国Rule B Attachment制度为例,现对其概念特征、起源发展、及具体制度进行分析比较,以期对海事请求保全制度能有一个更新、更全面的认识。
