期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
《莊子·應帝王》的以道克巫——壺子四示與遊化主體 被引量:1
1
作者 賴錫三 《诸子学刊》 2022年第1期48-75,共28页
本文解讀《莊子·應帝王》,尤其集中對“壺子四示”所展現的“遊化主體”,進行細部詮解。然本文所延伸討論的相關課題還包括:一、《莊子》“以道克巫”的思想源流之説明。二、真人“遊化”主體與神巫“恍惚”主體的分判。三、《莊... 本文解讀《莊子·應帝王》,尤其集中對“壺子四示”所展現的“遊化主體”,進行細部詮解。然本文所延伸討論的相關課題還包括:一、《莊子》“以道克巫”的思想源流之説明。二、真人“遊化”主體與神巫“恍惚”主體的分判。三、《莊子》面對“命”與“化”的核心態度。四、命“得而被相”與“不可得相”的關鍵。五、遊化主體的變化莫測。六、以“波隨委蛇”和“不住渾沌”重解“渾沌鑿竅”。 展开更多
关键词 《莊子·應帝王》 以道克巫 壺子四示 遊化主
下载PDF
《庄子》的关系性自由与吊诡性修养——疏解《逍遥游》的“小大之辩”与“三无智慧” 被引量:7
2
作者 赖锡三 《商丘师范学院学报》 CAS 2018年第2期1-18,共18页
逍遥这种游化主体,隐含着"自由"的讯息,但这种自由并非删除关系的独我论,或者独白式的抽象性自由。《逍遥游》的自由,既不离于物我之间的力量交换之存有论式的原初伦理性关系,也无所逃于人我之间角色扮演的社会伦理性关系。... 逍遥这种游化主体,隐含着"自由"的讯息,但这种自由并非删除关系的独我论,或者独白式的抽象性自由。《逍遥游》的自由,既不离于物我之间的力量交换之存有论式的原初伦理性关系,也无所逃于人我之间角色扮演的社会伦理性关系。而如何将物我关系与人我关系,从"物我相待""相刃相靡",转化为"物我相游""游刃有余"?以往解读《庄子》,片面执取"天地与我并生,万物与我为一"的自然形上美学向度,经常误以为唯有脱尽人我关系的人间世束缚,方能得到"上与造物者游"的初始境界,如此造成《庄子》上下皆游的圆通周游之智慧,受到了片面化遮蔽。尝试将《庄子》的自然美学与人文治疗结合起来,希望揭露《庄子》的自由,乃同时在物我关系与人我关系之中展开。而这种既"游"且"化"的游化主体之逍遥,既是关系中的逍遥,更是活化了关系、丰富了关系的逍遥。因此"无待"并非消除物我关系、人我关系之后,"毫无挂搭"式的自由无待,这种对无待的理解过于抽象空洞。应该将个体自由与他人、他物的丰富性关系,也就是共在于人文世界、共在于物化世界的"具体性""丰富性"自由,给描述出来。而这种"入游其樊而无感其名",必触及"在其中"(入游其樊),又"不在其中"(无感其名)的吊诡智慧。而这样的吊诡智慧,正是透过"无"的主体性修养,从中打开"即无即有,即有即无"的"有无两行"之"否定辩证"运动。由此便涉及了"至人无己,神人无功,圣人无名"的"三无"修养与智慧。最后,将《逍遥游》小大之辩的隐喻,落实四种人格主体状态的比较上,"知效一官,行比一乡,德合一君,而征一国"属于外求社会我的"膨胀主体",宋荣子的"辩乎内外之分"属于内求本真我的"孤零主体",列子的"御风而行"偏于巫风的"恍惚主体",而"至人无己,神人无功,圣人无名"则属于不住两边、游乎两行的"吊诡主体"。 展开更多
关键词 《逍遥游》 游化主 小大之辩 三无智慧 吊诡修养
下载PDF
《逍遥游》經典文本的五種詮釋視角
3
作者 施海平 《诸子学刊》 2021年第2期57-64,共8页
《逍遥游》是《莊子》中最重要的篇章,“逍遥”作爲整部《莊子》的核心和靈魂,也是被學界討論最多的話題之一。《逍遥游》誕生於蒙地,但又不局限於此,它開啓了《莊子》整個文本,同時也代表着中國哲學思維方式的另一種範式。從歷史文化... 《逍遥游》是《莊子》中最重要的篇章,“逍遥”作爲整部《莊子》的核心和靈魂,也是被學界討論最多的話題之一。《逍遥游》誕生於蒙地,但又不局限於此,它開啓了《莊子》整個文本,同時也代表着中國哲學思維方式的另一種範式。從歷史文化的角度探尋《莊子》的起源,要追溯到神話和宗教,因爲這是走向形上學詮釋的前提;逍遥的主體不僅僅是個體精神的逍遥,逍遥的主體作爲游化主體是物我形成的整體場域的顯現,它的呈現離不開主體的條件,主體的修養工夫越高,其顯現得越充分;《逍遥游》文本是隨着“小大之辯”“有待與無待”“有用與大用”三組經典命題而層級展開的,具有重要的意義;莊子的語言富有特色,語言是道之載體,莊子“三言”不是人對道的言説,而是道在言説自身;“逍遥”作爲一種自發性深層自然秩序,可推延到社會政治場域之内,爲社會秩序的建立提供某種範式,個體與個體、個體與群體之間獲得最大程度的自由空間。這五種詮釋視角,把《逍遥游》編織成一幅思想地圖,“逍遥義”通過這幅思想地圖獲得鋪陳和顯現。 展开更多
关键词 逍遥游 游化主體 語言 秩序
下载PDF
Stakeholder Contradictions and Win-win Strategies for Tourism along the Ancient Tea Horse Road in the South of Yunnan based on Game Analysis 被引量:2
4
作者 WANG Yan XIE Hongzhong 《Journal of Resources and Ecology》 CSCD 2020年第5期531-538,共8页
With the emergence of the concept of cultural routes, researchers have increasingly turned their attention to the sustainable development of tourism along cultural routes. The needs for community participation and the... With the emergence of the concept of cultural routes, researchers have increasingly turned their attention to the sustainable development of tourism along cultural routes. The needs for community participation and the ongoing provision of benefits of stakeholders are characteristics of cultural routes. Therefore, the importance of cooperative relations and systematic development among stakeholders in tourism activities along cultural routes has become a subject of interest. This paper selects local government, tourism enterprises and local community residents, all of which play a key role in the Ancient Tea Horse Road cultural route in the south of Yunnan, as the main stakeholders. We use game theory to construct a model to trace interactions between local government and tourism enterprises, between tourism enterprises and community residents, and between local government and community residents. The paper then analyzes the different interests of the three parties and key factors that influence them in the game process. This provided a certain scientific basis for the win-win decisions regarding tourism development made by the three parties. Our results show that the final decision choices of the three parties depend on the initial payoff matrix of the game, and the influence of key parameters. When making decisions about tourism, the government should respect the wishes of local residents, strengthen protections of local traditions, manage the unreasonable behavior of tourism enterprises as they develop tourism, and develop appropriate penalties for violations of regulations. When tourism enterprises carry out tourism development, they should let community residents take the initiative and fully participate in tourism activities, and be sure that income from tourism is fed back to local residents, to ensure that tourism is mutually beneficial. The study shows that conflicts among the three parties originated mainly from differences in interests, but that the three parties also shared common interests. With a goal of coordinating interests, we can establish relevant mechanisms, follow the principle of interest realization, attach importance to supervision and management, strengthen community participation and decision-making, and realize win-win results for the three parties. 展开更多
关键词 cultural route tourism activities STAKEHOLDERS game analysis win-win strategy
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部