基于强度折减安全系数的边坡岩土侧压力计算方法探讨

对边坡岩土侧压力计算方法进行讨论,指出《建筑边坡工程技术规范》(GB50330–2002)中边坡岩土侧压力计算方法没有与边坡稳定安全系数建立直接联系。传递系数法中的滑坡推力计算安全系数并不是支挡后边坡要达到的稳定安全系数。提出基于强度折减安全系数的岩土侧压力计算新方法,计算时将滑面强度除以一个折减系数,然后再根据力的平衡关系直接计算支挡结构承担的相应荷载。按照此方法,支挡后边坡的稳定安全系数就正好等于侧向岩土压力计算时的强度折减系数。由此得出的岩土侧压力计算安全系数就是指边坡治理后要达到的稳定系数,算例表明该方法的可行性。

黄土滑坡与降雨关系的模型试验研究

针对降雨诱发滑坡的机理,从定量化的角度,研究滑坡安全系数与降雨强度和降雨历时的关系。采用降雨滑坡模型试验监测边坡在不同降雨强度、降雨历时下发生破坏的过程,通过室内试验测定含水率、密度和抗剪强度指标等物理力学指标,然后对滑坡和降雨之间的关系进行归纳分析。研究结果表明:滑坡安全系数和降雨强度、降雨历时之间存在定量关系,并拟合出相关公式。通过Midas数值模拟进行对比分析,从而验证了拟合公式的可靠性。

利用高密度电法勘探盐边县格萨拉巨型滑坡堆积体

探讨盐边县格萨拉巨型滑坡堆积体的滑动面的位置和形态并分析滑坡稳定性进而为拟建高速公路路线设计提供有效的建议。采用高密度电法作为初步勘察阶段的滑坡勘探手段,建立不同采集装置的滑坡正演模型进行数值分析,初步了解拟勘探滑坡的视电阻率拟断面图并确定采集装置类型,结合地质调查结果,确定主要的反演参数,并根据反演结果修正正演模型进行对比判别。结果表明,研究所用的反演参数效果较好,正演模型修正之后的视电阻率剖面与反演结果相匹配,使反演解译成果能够较好地反映出真实滑动面的位置和形态,且通过钻探得到了验证,计算结果表明该滑坡处于不稳定状态。最终,拟建高速公路的选线设计采纳了研究成果,对该巨型滑坡堆积体采取绕避措施,说明高速公路初步勘察阶段采用高密度电法作为巨型滑坡堆积体滑动面勘察的地球物理勘探手段是经济且高效的。

Rapid assessment of regional superficial landslide under heavy rainfall

In order to establish a rapid method for regional slope stability analysis under rainfall,matric suction and seepage force were taken into account after obtaining explicit solution of infiltration depth.Moreover,simplified analysis model under 3D condition was put forward based on identification and division of slope units,as well as modification of sliding direction of each column.The result shows that explicit solution of infiltration depth is of good precision;for the given model,safety factors without taking seepage force into account are 1.82-2.94 times higher;the stagnation point of slope angle is located approximately in the range of(45°,50°);the safety factor changes insignificantly when wetting front is deeper than 2 m;when matric suction changes in the specified range,the maximum variations of safety factor are less than 0.5,which proves that matric suction plays an insignificant role in maintaining slope stability compared to the slope angle and infiltration depth.Incorporated with geographic information system,a practical application of regional slope stability assessment verifies the applicability of the proposed method.

Three-dimensional stability of landslides based on local safety factor

Unlike the limit equilibrium method(LEM), with which only the global safety factor of the landslide can be calculated, a local safety factor(LSF) method is proposed to evaluate the stability of different sections of a landslide in this paper. Based on three-dimensional(3D) numerical simulation results, the local safety factor is defined as the ratio of the shear strength of the soil at an element on the slip zone to the shear stress parallel to the sliding direction at that element. The global safety factor of the landslide is defined as the weighted average of all local safety factors based on the area of the slip surface. Some example analyses show that the results computed by the LSF method agree well with those calculated by the General Limit Equilibrium(GLE) method in two-dimensional(2D) models and the distribution of the LSF in the 3D slip zone is consistent with that indicated by the observed deformation pattern of an actual landslide in China.

Limit equilibrium method for slope stability based on assumed stress on slip surface

In the limit equilibrium framework, two- and three-dimensional slope stabilities can be solved according to the overall force and moment equilibrium conditions of a sliding body. In this work, based on Mohr-Coulomb(M-C) strength criterion and the initial normal stress without considering the inter-slice(or inter-column) forces, the normal and shear stresses on the slip surface are assumed using some dimensionless variables, and these variables have the same numbers with the force and moment equilibrium equations of a sliding body to establish easily the linear equation groups for solving them. After these variables are determined, the normal stresses, shear stresses, and slope safety factor are also obtained using the stresses assumptions and M-C strength criterion. In the case of a three-dimensional slope stability analysis, three calculation methods, namely, a non-strict method, quasi-strict method, and strict method, can be obtained by satisfying different force and moment equilibrium conditions. Results of the comparison in the classic two- and three-dimensional slope examples show that the slope safety factors calculated using the current method and the other limit equilibrium methods are approximately equal to each other, indicating the feasibility of the current method; further, the following conclusions are obtained: 1) The current method better amends the initial normal and shear stresses acting on the slip surface, and has the identical results with using simplified Bishop method, Spencer method, and Morgenstern-Price(M-P) method; however, the stress curve of the current method is smoother than that obtained using the three abovementioned methods. 2) The current method is suitable for analyzing the two- and three-dimensional slope stability. 3) In the three-dimensional asymmetric sliding body, the non-strict method yields safer solutions, and the results of the quasi-strict method are relatively reasonable and close to those of the strict method, indicating that the quasi-strict method can be used to obtain a reliable slope safety factor.