Background: Although the wireless Bravo pH system is effective, some patients experience retrosternal sensations possibly caused by esophageal sensitivity that may complicate clinical application. Methods: Ambulatory ...Background: Although the wireless Bravo pH system is effective, some patients experience retrosternal sensations possibly caused by esophageal sensitivity that may complicate clinical application. Methods: Ambulatory pH of 40 consecutive patients with GERD who had erosive esophagitis or nonerosive reflux disease, were monitored for 2 days with the Bravo system. Results were stratified and compared on the basis of self-awareness of the intraesophageal capsule. Results: Path ologic acid reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients and normal reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients. Seventeen patients (42.5%) reported retrosternal discomfort, and 12 of them (70.6%) had normal reflux. Patients with retrosternal discomfort were less likely to have moderate endoscopic esophagitis, i.e., Los Angeles classification grades B, C, and D endoscopic esophagitis (p = 0.006), and were less likely to have significantly elevated esophageal acid exposure (p = 0.0036) than those who did not perceive the discomfort. Reported discomfort was not associated with age, gender, or the presence of endoscopic esophagitis. Conclusions: The negative correlation between Bravo-capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort and esophageal-acid exposure indicates modified mechanical afferent nerve function after long-term acid stimulation. Capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort in the presence of normal acid exposure suggests functional heartburn.展开更多
文摘Background: Although the wireless Bravo pH system is effective, some patients experience retrosternal sensations possibly caused by esophageal sensitivity that may complicate clinical application. Methods: Ambulatory pH of 40 consecutive patients with GERD who had erosive esophagitis or nonerosive reflux disease, were monitored for 2 days with the Bravo system. Results were stratified and compared on the basis of self-awareness of the intraesophageal capsule. Results: Path ologic acid reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients and normal reflux was diagnosed in 20 patients. Seventeen patients (42.5%) reported retrosternal discomfort, and 12 of them (70.6%) had normal reflux. Patients with retrosternal discomfort were less likely to have moderate endoscopic esophagitis, i.e., Los Angeles classification grades B, C, and D endoscopic esophagitis (p = 0.006), and were less likely to have significantly elevated esophageal acid exposure (p = 0.0036) than those who did not perceive the discomfort. Reported discomfort was not associated with age, gender, or the presence of endoscopic esophagitis. Conclusions: The negative correlation between Bravo-capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort and esophageal-acid exposure indicates modified mechanical afferent nerve function after long-term acid stimulation. Capsule-induced retrosternal discomfort in the presence of normal acid exposure suggests functional heartburn.
