卡里尔•爱默森《以赛亚•伯林与米哈伊尔•巴赫金:相对的亲缘关系》一文原载于《交织、连接与缠斗》(symploke,Vol.7,No.1/2,Affiliation(1999),pp.139-164.Published by:University of Nebraska Press.),从思想史及文学的交叉视域,分析...卡里尔•爱默森《以赛亚•伯林与米哈伊尔•巴赫金:相对的亲缘关系》一文原载于《交织、连接与缠斗》(symploke,Vol.7,No.1/2,Affiliation(1999),pp.139-164.Published by:University of Nebraska Press.),从思想史及文学的交叉视域,分析英国哲学家以赛亚•伯林与俄国文艺理论家米哈伊尔•巴赫金的亲缘关系,产生了较为广泛的学术影响。以赛亚•伯林和米哈伊尔•巴赫金均在不同程度上被视为相对主义者,但二人却极力抵制这一看法。巴赫金认为,相对主义强调单一层面差异观点、之间的两可状态,而他所提倡的多元对话则始终坚持主体所处位置的外在性与责任性,这一位置无法被平铺在一个平面视角之内。伯林则认为,相对主义将生活中的各种选项视为均等的模棱两可,他主张的多元主义则强调悲剧选择的必然性。伯林与巴赫金的主要思想都偏重温和、宽容与多元性,他们的相似性可在各自着重论述的俄罗斯作家——托尔斯泰与陀思妥耶夫斯基性格中的共通之处找到源头,但巴赫金比伯林更重视主体视域中的他者位置。由此可见,两位思想家共同持有一种负责任的多元性思想。展开更多
In reading Cooper,Emerson,Thoreau,Mark Twain and James Baldwin,we find that there is some-thing in common in the works of these writers.All these authors are trying to find their personal identity.They are trying to f...In reading Cooper,Emerson,Thoreau,Mark Twain and James Baldwin,we find that there is some-thing in common in the works of these writers.All these authors are trying to find their personal identity.They are trying to find out who they are,what position they hold in society,what value and meaning of their lives are. They either speak them out in their essays directly or indirectly in the light of literary im-ages in their fiction.展开更多
文摘卡里尔•爱默森《以赛亚•伯林与米哈伊尔•巴赫金:相对的亲缘关系》一文原载于《交织、连接与缠斗》(symploke,Vol.7,No.1/2,Affiliation(1999),pp.139-164.Published by:University of Nebraska Press.),从思想史及文学的交叉视域,分析英国哲学家以赛亚•伯林与俄国文艺理论家米哈伊尔•巴赫金的亲缘关系,产生了较为广泛的学术影响。以赛亚•伯林和米哈伊尔•巴赫金均在不同程度上被视为相对主义者,但二人却极力抵制这一看法。巴赫金认为,相对主义强调单一层面差异观点、之间的两可状态,而他所提倡的多元对话则始终坚持主体所处位置的外在性与责任性,这一位置无法被平铺在一个平面视角之内。伯林则认为,相对主义将生活中的各种选项视为均等的模棱两可,他主张的多元主义则强调悲剧选择的必然性。伯林与巴赫金的主要思想都偏重温和、宽容与多元性,他们的相似性可在各自着重论述的俄罗斯作家——托尔斯泰与陀思妥耶夫斯基性格中的共通之处找到源头,但巴赫金比伯林更重视主体视域中的他者位置。由此可见,两位思想家共同持有一种负责任的多元性思想。
文摘In reading Cooper,Emerson,Thoreau,Mark Twain and James Baldwin,we find that there is some-thing in common in the works of these writers.All these authors are trying to find their personal identity.They are trying to find out who they are,what position they hold in society,what value and meaning of their lives are. They either speak them out in their essays directly or indirectly in the light of literary im-ages in their fiction.
