期刊文献+
共找到6篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
1998—2008年新疆甜菜作物空间格局变化及其发展 被引量:2
1
作者 李冬旭 田至美 《中国糖料》 2011年第2期34-37,共4页
从新疆各地区甜菜产量、甜菜的播种面积以及甜菜的单位面积产量3个指标入手,分析近十年来新疆甜菜在全国的状况以及新疆各地区甜菜生产状况,通过选取1998、2003、2008年的数据,利用MapInfo软件绘制甜菜作物生产状况分布图,经过对比分析... 从新疆各地区甜菜产量、甜菜的播种面积以及甜菜的单位面积产量3个指标入手,分析近十年来新疆甜菜在全国的状况以及新疆各地区甜菜生产状况,通过选取1998、2003、2008年的数据,利用MapInfo软件绘制甜菜作物生产状况分布图,经过对比分析初步了解新疆各地区甜菜生产布局变化。并对新疆地区甜菜作物提出了可持续发展的措施。 展开更多
关键词 甜菜作物 新疆地区 空间格局变化 发展
下载PDF
几种长残留除草剂对后茬作物甜菜的影响 被引量:3
2
作者 黄春艳 陈铁保 +4 位作者 王宇 黄元炬 丛林 朴德万 孙宝宏 《中国糖料》 2005年第3期21-24,共4页
1992~2003年进行了模拟普施特和豆磺隆土壤残留对后茬作物甜菜的安全性试验。研究结果表明,普施特低剂量62.5mL/hm2即对甜菜有严重药害,甜菜苗鲜重降低90.9%;普施特125mL/hm2以上各处理,甜菜苗全部死亡。豆磺隆低剂量0.25g/hm2对甜菜... 1992~2003年进行了模拟普施特和豆磺隆土壤残留对后茬作物甜菜的安全性试验。研究结果表明,普施特低剂量62.5mL/hm2即对甜菜有严重药害,甜菜苗鲜重降低90.9%;普施特125mL/hm2以上各处理,甜菜苗全部死亡。豆磺隆低剂量0.25g/hm2对甜菜的保苗株数、苗高、苗鲜重影响较小,但产量降低17.9%;高剂量2、4g/hm2处理药害严重,甜菜死苗率90%以上,产量降低92%以上。广灭灵975~3000mL/hm2各剂量处理施药后12个月,对甜菜均无明显药害,株鲜重和产量与不施药对照相近。金豆1000、1500mL/hm2低剂量处理,施药后12个月对甜菜药害轻微,可以种植,24个月后可以安全种植甜菜;金豆2000、3000mL/hm2高剂量,施药后12个月对甜菜有明显药害,不可以种植;24个月后药害轻微,可以种植甜菜。金普施特低剂量1250mL/hm2和倍量2500mL/hm2处理对甜菜均有药害。施药后12个月药害重于24个月和36个月。但36个月后高、低剂量下仍有药害,仍不能安全种植甜菜。阔草清60、120、180g/hm2各处理,施药后12个月均有较重药害,不能种植;施药后24个月时,60g/hm2低剂量处理药害虽然较轻,但仍与不施药对照有较大差异,也不能安全种植,高剂量处理药害仍很严重。 展开更多
关键词 长残留除草剂 后茬作物甜菜 安全性
下载PDF
甜菜种植比较效益分析 被引量:10
3
作者 卢秉福 韩卫平 祁勇 《中国糖料》 2009年第3期39-41,共3页
应用多目标决策的密切值法原理,引入全局思想,按时序建立全局数据表,构建甜菜及其比对作物种植效益分析的数学模型。结果表明,甜菜种植效益排名第一位,具有比较优势,为黑龙江、新疆、内蒙古三省区优势作物,该结果对制定甜菜种植规划与... 应用多目标决策的密切值法原理,引入全局思想,按时序建立全局数据表,构建甜菜及其比对作物种植效益分析的数学模型。结果表明,甜菜种植效益排名第一位,具有比较优势,为黑龙江、新疆、内蒙古三省区优势作物,该结果对制定甜菜种植规划与制糖企业布局具有重要意义。 展开更多
关键词 甜菜作物 种植效益 密切值
下载PDF
家庭农场“两费自理”责任制效果好
4
作者 周淑兰 《中国农业会计》 1996年第3期32-33,共2页
家庭农场“两费自理”责任制效果好周淑兰新疆生产建设兵团各团场自兴办职工家庭农场以来,在很长时间里对家庭农场的生产资料费用与生活资料费用由团场垫支,秋后用上交产品价款抵还。家庭农场应上交的利费税,也在秋后上交产品的价款... 家庭农场“两费自理”责任制效果好周淑兰新疆生产建设兵团各团场自兴办职工家庭农场以来,在很长时间里对家庭农场的生产资料费用与生活资料费用由团场垫支,秋后用上交产品价款抵还。家庭农场应上交的利费税,也在秋后上交产品的价款中抵扣。这种办法使团扬垫付了大量资... 展开更多
关键词 家庭农场 责任制 两费自理 生产费用 费税 甜菜作物 产品管理 收获后 生产经营 统一收购
下载PDF
Water Requirements of Sugar Beet Beta vulgaris under Heavy Cracking Clay Soils
5
作者 Abdelhadi Abdel Wahab Ahmed Ali Salih 《Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(B)》 2012年第8期865-874,共10页
Crop coefficients (Kc) of sugar beet were determined for accurate calculation of water requirements (CWR) and better irrigation water management. Three irrigation treatments were used during two seasons to measure... Crop coefficients (Kc) of sugar beet were determined for accurate calculation of water requirements (CWR) and better irrigation water management. Three irrigation treatments were used during two seasons to measure actual crop water use (ETc) under no soil stress treatment using gravimetric sampling. In the second season (SS), the method was modified to target 8 temporal points during crop growth for smooth calculation of ETc under sufficient moisture supply to avoid the distortion that was created by the continuous gravimetric sampling after, before and during each irrigation cycle on the experimental plots. Water was stopped when each targeted sampling point was reached using large plots where intensive sampling continues until the crop reaches severe water stress or permanent wilting point (PWP). The actual crop water use was extracted from the soil moisture depletion curve which allowed the identification of two clear segments. The first segment indicated crop water use during no water stress while the change of the slope indicated the beginning of the water stress. The reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) was determined on daily basis using appropriate weather data that coincides with the ETc measurement and consequently the crop Kc were calculated. The results showed that the method used during the SS is easy and provides a better understanding of actual crop water use and better estimation of crop Kc. The calculated 10-day Kc values for sugar beet under heavy cracking clay soil conditions were: 0.46, 0.49, 0.53 and 0.60; for the initial stage: 0.69, 0.78, 0.88 and 0.97; for the development stage: 1.05, 1.11, 1.13, 1.11 and 1.04; for mid-season stage and for late season stage: 0.92, 0.74 and 0.60. Yield and other sugar related parameters were also presented for the two seasons. 展开更多
关键词 Sugar beet crop water requirements cracking clay gravimetric sampling.
下载PDF
Overview on Soil Compaction and Sugar Beet Growth
6
作者 ZHOU Yanli SUN Qunying +3 位作者 YU Lihua LIU Na LU Bingfu LIU Xiaoxue 《中国糖料》 2024年第4期68-77,共10页
With the advancement of agricultural mechanization,soil compaction has become a serious environmental problem.Soil compaction can increase soil bulk density and firmness,reduce porosity and permeability,and deteriorat... With the advancement of agricultural mechanization,soil compaction has become a serious environmental problem.Soil compaction can increase soil bulk density and firmness,reduce porosity and permeability,and deteriorate soil structure,ultimately inhibit sugar beet growth and reduce both root yield and sugar content.However,few farmers recognize the link between soil compaction and these adverse effects.Soil compaction has a cumulative effect,with significant differences observed in the vertical range of compaction accumulation.The most significant soil compaction occurs in the topsoil of 0-10 cm,and the influence depth can reach 70 cm,but it is small in deep soil,and the inflection point is at a soil depth of 10 cm.The degree of soil compaction is related to soil type,water content,tractor shaft load,tyre type,tyre pressure and operation speed,etc.Therefore,in the production process of sugar beet,it is advisable to avoid high-humidity operations,use low pressure tyres,reduce the number of tractor-units passes over the farmland,and implement agricultural and agronomic measures to minimize soil compaction.These practices will help protect the soil environment and ensure sustainable production of sugar beets. 展开更多
关键词 sugar beet crop agricultural mechanization soil compaction
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部