期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
生命的自在意蕴与伦理本位——生命伦理学研究的三维向度 被引量:3
1
作者 唐代兴 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第1期1-12,共12页
生命既是本体的又是形成的。在本体世界,生命原发存在,其自在性和他者性内在地统一,并表征为感性的伦理意蕴。在形成世界,生命继发存在,其潜在伦理意蕴必彰显为现实伦理要求,并因为遭遇利害而敞开三种可能性朝向。但是,这些体现不同可... 生命既是本体的又是形成的。在本体世界,生命原发存在,其自在性和他者性内在地统一,并表征为感性的伦理意蕴。在形成世界,生命继发存在,其潜在伦理意蕴必彰显为现实伦理要求,并因为遭遇利害而敞开三种可能性朝向。但是,这些体现不同可能性朝向的伦理要求只能在生命创造之"生命的产物"这个层面展开,根本无助于消解生命自由与生命平等之间的矛盾和生命的产物控制与反抗控制之间的冲突。生命伦理学诞生于这一双重拉锯战中,并必然肩负以下使命:一是在人的形成世界中如何引导生命和呵护生命;二是在人的本体世界中如何实现生命的自在与自由。由此,生命伦理学必然开辟出生命本体的伦理学、生命形成的伦理学以及能够整合二者的生命伦理方法学。 展开更多
关键词 生命伦理 自由的平等限度 生命本体的伦理 生命形成的伦理 生命伦理方法学
原文传递
Methodology of the Relationship between Bioethics, Philosophy, and Law
2
作者 Natalia Sedova 《Journal of Philosophy Study》 2013年第7期669-675,共7页
One can distinguish three levels in the integrative unity of knowledge and norms (assessments), which is termed bioethics. The first level is theoretical. It is connected with the facts and truths. The second level ... One can distinguish three levels in the integrative unity of knowledge and norms (assessments), which is termed bioethics. The first level is theoretical. It is connected with the facts and truths. The second level deals with establishing of certain standards and rules of conduct, with the monitoring of their implementation and the assessment of the results of implementation/violation of norms. The third level is associated with individual behavior, formed on the basis of relevant knowledge (or lack of it, as is evident from the table), and the rules governing its application. Theoretical Bioethics is an integral part of Philosophy---the practical Bioethics is directly related to Law and applied Bioethics deals with the personal standards of specific behavior in concrete situations. Social need for regulatory control of any activity with living entities has led to rapid development of practical Bioethics, while its philosophical content developed more slowly. This creates a conflict of norms and values, hampering the adoption of individual decisions now in the field of applied Bioethics. Deontologization of Bioethics can lead to the fact that it will lose its philosophical content and become a specific area of Law. This, in turn, leads to the dehumanization of Bioethics. It is therefore necessary to conduct a methodological analysis of the relationship of Philosophy, Bioethics and Law, the results of which will focus the researchers on the synchronization of the axiological, praxeological and ethical components of scientific research in order to preserve the intellectual integrity of Bioethics. 展开更多
关键词 theoretical bioethics practical bioethics applied philosophy law AXIOLOGY DEONTOLOGY methodologicalcrossing
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部