药用塑料容器的生物检测试验

作者根据文献对３个厂家生产的药用塑料容器进行了安全、热原、溶血、皮内、植入生物检测试验，结果发现目前药用塑料容器符合生物检测标准的极少。建议改进生产，提高质量。

剖析肺炎支原体的感染炎症反应的微生物试验检测临床诊断报告

探讨剖析肺炎支原体的感染炎症反应的微生物试验检测临床诊断报告。方法 选择2020年10月至2021年12月间,对120名肺炎支原体感染病人进行了快速血清学和微生物检测,并对两种方法进行了检测,并对不同年龄阶段两种方法进行了检测结果的对比。结果 用细菌法进行快速血清学检测,其阳性率分别为75.83%、92.50%和92.50%。比较各年龄组的检测结果,3岁以下和4~7岁两种方法之间有显著性差异, P0.05;8-12岁和12岁以上人群的两种方法检出率均未见显著性差异, P>0.05。结论 肺炎支原体的感染炎症反应的微生物试验检测临床诊断效果确切,优于采取快速血清学检验的模式,在肺炎支原体感染的临床检测中,采用微生物检测法检测肺炎支原体的准确可能性很大,早期检测的检出率高,为临床诊断和对症处理提供了可靠的依据。

SUMMATION OF ABSOLUTE VALUE TEST FOR MULTIPLE OUTCOME COMPARISON WITH MODERATE EFFECT

In biomedical research,in order to evaluate the effect of a drug,investigators often need to compare the differences between one treatment group and another one by using multiple outcomes.The rank-sum tests can handle the case where the outcome differences between two groups are in the same direction.If they are not,MAX can handle it and is very useful when one/some of the differences is/are relatively larger than the others.When the individual outcome difference between two groups is moderate,a new method,summation of the absolute value of rank-based test for each outcome,is proposed in this work.Power comparison with the existing methods based on simulation studies and a real example show that the proposed test is a robust test,and works well when the difference for each outcome is moderate.The authors also derive some theoretical results for comparing the power between MAX and the the proposed method.