AIM: To study the effects of perioperative administration of cimetidine (CIM) on peripheral blood lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) ...AIM: To study the effects of perioperative administration of cimetidine (CIM) on peripheral blood lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: Forty-nine GI cancer patients were randomized into treatment group, who took CIM in perioperative period,and control group, who did not take the drug. The treatment was initiated 7 days before operation and continued for 10 days after surgery. At baseline examination before operation, on the 2rid and 10th postoperative days, total T lymphocytes, T helper cells, T suppressor cells, and NK cells in peripheral blood were measured respectively by immunocytochemical method using mouse-anti human CD3,CD4, CD8 and CD57 monoclonal antibodies. Blood samples from 20 healthy volunteers were treated in the same way as normal controls. Surgical specimens were examined during routine histopathological evaluation for the presence of TiL in tumor margin. Immunohistochemical study was performed to measure the proportion of T and B lymphocytes in T[L population. T and B lymphocytes were detected respectively using mouse-anti-human CD3 and CD20 monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: in comparison with normal controls, both the treatment and control groups had decreased T cells, T helper cells and NK cells at baseline. In control group, total T cells,T helper cells and NK cells declined continuously with the disease progression and the decrease became more obvious after operation. From baseline to the 2nd postoperative day,the proportion of total T cells, T helper cells, and NK cellswent down from 60.5±4.6% to 56.2±3.8%, 33.4±3.7% to28.1±3.4%, and 15.0±2.8% to 14.2±2.2%, respectively.On the other hand, there were significant improvements in these parameters after CIM treatment. On the 10th postoperative day, the treatment group had significantly higher percentages of total T cells, T helper cells and NK cells than control group. Moreover, CIM treatment also boosted TiL response, as was reflected by findings that 68%(17/25) of the patients in treatment group had significant TIL responses and only 25% (6/24) of the cases had discernible TIL responses (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Perioperative application of CIM to GI cancer patients could help restore the diminished cellular immunity induced by tumor burden and surgical maneuver. The drug could also boost TIL responses to tumor. These effects suggest that the drug be used as an immunomodulator for GI cancer patients.展开更多
基金Supported by the Science Progress Project of Hubei Province,No.2001AA301C35
文摘AIM: To study the effects of perioperative administration of cimetidine (CIM) on peripheral blood lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: Forty-nine GI cancer patients were randomized into treatment group, who took CIM in perioperative period,and control group, who did not take the drug. The treatment was initiated 7 days before operation and continued for 10 days after surgery. At baseline examination before operation, on the 2rid and 10th postoperative days, total T lymphocytes, T helper cells, T suppressor cells, and NK cells in peripheral blood were measured respectively by immunocytochemical method using mouse-anti human CD3,CD4, CD8 and CD57 monoclonal antibodies. Blood samples from 20 healthy volunteers were treated in the same way as normal controls. Surgical specimens were examined during routine histopathological evaluation for the presence of TiL in tumor margin. Immunohistochemical study was performed to measure the proportion of T and B lymphocytes in T[L population. T and B lymphocytes were detected respectively using mouse-anti-human CD3 and CD20 monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: in comparison with normal controls, both the treatment and control groups had decreased T cells, T helper cells and NK cells at baseline. In control group, total T cells,T helper cells and NK cells declined continuously with the disease progression and the decrease became more obvious after operation. From baseline to the 2nd postoperative day,the proportion of total T cells, T helper cells, and NK cellswent down from 60.5±4.6% to 56.2±3.8%, 33.4±3.7% to28.1±3.4%, and 15.0±2.8% to 14.2±2.2%, respectively.On the other hand, there were significant improvements in these parameters after CIM treatment. On the 10th postoperative day, the treatment group had significantly higher percentages of total T cells, T helper cells and NK cells than control group. Moreover, CIM treatment also boosted TiL response, as was reflected by findings that 68%(17/25) of the patients in treatment group had significant TIL responses and only 25% (6/24) of the cases had discernible TIL responses (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Perioperative application of CIM to GI cancer patients could help restore the diminished cellular immunity induced by tumor burden and surgical maneuver. The drug could also boost TIL responses to tumor. These effects suggest that the drug be used as an immunomodulator for GI cancer patients.
