目的提高手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,对于以牵、扳法为主治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效进行观察分析,并探讨腰椎间盘突出症的机理及治疗临床适应症。方法随机把200例分为治疗组115例和对照组85例,两组均采用牵引床牵引30 m in,然后...目的提高手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,对于以牵、扳法为主治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效进行观察分析,并探讨腰椎间盘突出症的机理及治疗临床适应症。方法随机把200例分为治疗组115例和对照组85例,两组均采用牵引床牵引30 m in,然后治疗组采用手法推拿斜扳法,对照组采用内服中药。结果治疗组在腰痛功能和近、远期疗效都优于对照组,具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论手法仰卧牵拉斜扳法治疗腰椎间盘突出症尤其治疗侧凸型腰椎间盘突出症有很好疗效,临床值得进一步研究和推广。展开更多
Objective:To compare the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery(TORS)and non-robotic surgery(NRS)in the treatment of tongue base tumors.Methods:A total of 45 patients with tongue base tumors treated in our hospital wer...Objective:To compare the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery(TORS)and non-robotic surgery(NRS)in the treatment of tongue base tumors.Methods:A total of 45 patients with tongue base tumors treated in our hospital were selected,and they were divided into the TORS group and NRS group according to different surgical methods.The surgical indicators and postoperative complications of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:Compared with the NRS group,the operative time,bleeding volume and length of hospital stay were less in the TORS group,and the postoperative recurrence rate was less in the TORS group than that in the NRS group.The incidence rate of dysphagia and restricted mouth opening in the TORS group was lower than that in the NRS group within 30 d after surgery,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:TORS has better minimally invasive advantages in the treatment of tongue base tumors,including less intraoperative bleeding,smaller trauma,shorter length of hospital stay and faster recovery.展开更多
文摘目的提高手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,对于以牵、扳法为主治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效进行观察分析,并探讨腰椎间盘突出症的机理及治疗临床适应症。方法随机把200例分为治疗组115例和对照组85例,两组均采用牵引床牵引30 m in,然后治疗组采用手法推拿斜扳法,对照组采用内服中药。结果治疗组在腰痛功能和近、远期疗效都优于对照组,具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论手法仰卧牵拉斜扳法治疗腰椎间盘突出症尤其治疗侧凸型腰椎间盘突出症有很好疗效,临床值得进一步研究和推广。
文摘Objective:To compare the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery(TORS)and non-robotic surgery(NRS)in the treatment of tongue base tumors.Methods:A total of 45 patients with tongue base tumors treated in our hospital were selected,and they were divided into the TORS group and NRS group according to different surgical methods.The surgical indicators and postoperative complications of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results:Compared with the NRS group,the operative time,bleeding volume and length of hospital stay were less in the TORS group,and the postoperative recurrence rate was less in the TORS group than that in the NRS group.The incidence rate of dysphagia and restricted mouth opening in the TORS group was lower than that in the NRS group within 30 d after surgery,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:TORS has better minimally invasive advantages in the treatment of tongue base tumors,including less intraoperative bleeding,smaller trauma,shorter length of hospital stay and faster recovery.