AIM： To investigate the clinical significance and presence of mutations in the surface （S） and overlapping polymerase gene of hepatitis B patients with coexisting HBsAg and anti-HBs. METHODS： Twenty-three patients...AIM： To investigate the clinical significance and presence of mutations in the surface （S） and overlapping polymerase gene of hepatitis B patients with coexisting HBsAg and anti-HBs. METHODS： Twenty-three patients with chronic hepatitis B were studied. Of the 23 patients, i i were both positive for hepatitis B virus （HBV） surface antigen （HBsAg） and antibody to HBV surface antigen （anti-HBs）, 12 were negative for anti-HBs while positive for HBsAg. DNA was extracted from 200 μL serum of the patients. Nucleotide of the surface and overlapping polymerase gene from HBV-infected patients was amplified by PCR, and the PCR products were sequenced. RESULTS： Forty-one mutations were found within the surface gene protein of HBV in 15 patients （10 with coexisting HBsAg and anti-HBs）. Six （14.6%） out of 41 mutations were located at ＂α＂ determinant region in 5 patients （4 positive for HBsAg and anti-HBs）. Eleven mutations （26.8%） occurred in the downstream or upstream of ＂α＂ determinant region. Lamivudine （LMV）- selected mutations were found in three patients who developed anti-HBs, which occurred in amino acid positions （196, 198, 199） of the surface protein and in YMDD motif （M204I/V） of the polymerase protein simultaneously. Presence of these mutations did not relate to changes in ALT and HBV DNA levels.CONCLUSION： Besides mutations in the ＂α＂ determinant region, mutations at downstream or upstream of the ＂α＂ determinant region may contribute to the development of anti-HBs. These mutations do not block the replicating competency of HBV in the presence of high titer of anti-HBs.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the inhibitory effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) preS2 antibody (preS2Ab) against HBV in-fection and HBV-associated hepatic carcinogenesis.METHODS:An adenoviral vector carrying the full-length light...AIM:To investigate the inhibitory effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) preS2 antibody (preS2Ab) against HBV in-fection and HBV-associated hepatic carcinogenesis.METHODS:An adenoviral vector carrying the full-length light and heavy chains of the HBV preS2Ab gene,Ad315-preS2Ab,was constructed.Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting analyses were used to determine the preS2Ab expres-sion levels in vitro.Immunofluorescent techniques were used to examine the binding affinity between the expressed HBV preS2Ab and HBV-positive liver cells.ELISAs were also used to determine hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels to assess the inhibitory effect of the preS2Ab against HBV infection in L02 cells.The inhibitory effect of preS2Ab against hepatic carcinogen-esis was studied with diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in HBV transgenic mice.RESULTS:The expression of HBV preS2Ab increased with increases in the multiplicity of infection (MOI) of Ad315-preS2Ab in L02 cells,with 350.87 ± 17.37 μg/L of preS2Ab when the MOI was 100 plaque forming units (pfu)/cell.The expressed preS2Abs could recog-nize liver cells from HBV transgenic mice.ELISA results showed that L02 cells expressing preS2Ab produced less HBsAg after treatment with the serum of HBV pa-tients than parental L02 cells expressing no preS2Ab.HBV transgenic mice treated with Ad315-preS2Ab had fewer and smaller cancerous nodes after induction with DEN than mice treated with a blank Ad315 vec-tor or untreated mice.Additionally,the administration of Ad315-preS2Ab could alleviate hepatic cirrhosis and decrease the serum levels of alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase.CONCLUSION:Adenovirus-mediated HBV preS2Ab expression could inhibit HBV infection in L02 cells,and then inhibit DEN-induced hepatocellular carcinogenesis and protect hepatic function in HBV transgenic mice.展开更多
AIM： To compare intradermal （ID） and intramuscular （IM） booster doses, which have been used in healthy and high risk subjects, such as healthcare workers, haemodialysis patients, human immunodeficiency virus pati...AIM： To compare intradermal （ID） and intramuscular （IM） booster doses, which have been used in healthy and high risk subjects, such as healthcare workers, haemodialysis patients, human immunodeficiency virus patients, and renal transplant recipients unresponsive to initial hepatitis B vaccination, in celiac individuals. METHODS： We conducted our study on 58 celiac pa- tients, vaccinated in the first year of life, whose blood analysis had showed the absence of protective hepati- tis B virus （HBV） antibodies. All patients had received the last vaccine injection at least one year before study enrolment and they had been on a gluten free diet for at least 1 year. In all patients we randomly performed an HBV vaccine booster dose by ID or IM route. Thirty celiac patients were revaccinated with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine （Engerix B） 2 μg by the ID route, while 28 celiac patients were revaccinated with Engerix B 10 μg by the IM route. Four weeks after every boost- er dose, the anti-hepatitis B surface （HBs） antibody titer was measured by an enzyme-linked immune- adsorbent assay. We performed a maximum of three booster doses in patients with no anti-HBs antibodies after the first or the second vaccine dose. The cut off value for a negative anti-HBs antibody titer was 10 IU/L.Patients with values between 10 and 100 IU/L were considered ＂low responders＂ while patients with an antibody titer higher than 1000 IU/L were considered ＂high responders＂. RESULTS： No significant difference in age, gender, du- ration of illness, and years of gluten intake was found between the two groups. We found a high percent- age of ＂responders＂ after the first booster dose （ID = 76.7%, IM = 78.6%） and a greater increase after the third dose （ID = 90%, IM = 96.4%） of vaccine in both groups. Mloreover we found a significantly higher num- ber of high responders （with an anti-HBs antibody titer 〉 1000 IU/L） in the ID （40%） than in the IM （7.1%） group, and this difference was evident after the first booster dose of vaccination （P 〈 0.01）. No side effects were recorded in performing delivery of the vaccine by either the ID or IM route. CONCLUSION： Our study suggests that both ID and IM routes are effective and safe options to administer a booster dose of HBV vaccine in celiac patients. Howev- er the ID route seems to achieve a greater number of high responders and to have a better cost/benefit ratio.展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.30271182
文摘AIM： To investigate the clinical significance and presence of mutations in the surface （S） and overlapping polymerase gene of hepatitis B patients with coexisting HBsAg and anti-HBs. METHODS： Twenty-three patients with chronic hepatitis B were studied. Of the 23 patients, i i were both positive for hepatitis B virus （HBV） surface antigen （HBsAg） and antibody to HBV surface antigen （anti-HBs）, 12 were negative for anti-HBs while positive for HBsAg. DNA was extracted from 200 μL serum of the patients. Nucleotide of the surface and overlapping polymerase gene from HBV-infected patients was amplified by PCR, and the PCR products were sequenced. RESULTS： Forty-one mutations were found within the surface gene protein of HBV in 15 patients （10 with coexisting HBsAg and anti-HBs）. Six （14.6%） out of 41 mutations were located at ＂α＂ determinant region in 5 patients （4 positive for HBsAg and anti-HBs）. Eleven mutations （26.8%） occurred in the downstream or upstream of ＂α＂ determinant region. Lamivudine （LMV）- selected mutations were found in three patients who developed anti-HBs, which occurred in amino acid positions （196, 198, 199） of the surface protein and in YMDD motif （M204I/V） of the polymerase protein simultaneously. Presence of these mutations did not relate to changes in ALT and HBV DNA levels.CONCLUSION： Besides mutations in the ＂α＂ determinant region, mutations at downstream or upstream of the ＂α＂ determinant region may contribute to the development of anti-HBs. These mutations do not block the replicating competency of HBV in the presence of high titer of anti-HBs.
基金Supported by The National Natural Science Foundation ofChina,No.30872998
文摘AIM:To investigate the inhibitory effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) preS2 antibody (preS2Ab) against HBV in-fection and HBV-associated hepatic carcinogenesis.METHODS:An adenoviral vector carrying the full-length light and heavy chains of the HBV preS2Ab gene,Ad315-preS2Ab,was constructed.Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting analyses were used to determine the preS2Ab expres-sion levels in vitro.Immunofluorescent techniques were used to examine the binding affinity between the expressed HBV preS2Ab and HBV-positive liver cells.ELISAs were also used to determine hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels to assess the inhibitory effect of the preS2Ab against HBV infection in L02 cells.The inhibitory effect of preS2Ab against hepatic carcinogen-esis was studied with diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in HBV transgenic mice.RESULTS:The expression of HBV preS2Ab increased with increases in the multiplicity of infection (MOI) of Ad315-preS2Ab in L02 cells,with 350.87 ± 17.37 μg/L of preS2Ab when the MOI was 100 plaque forming units (pfu)/cell.The expressed preS2Abs could recog-nize liver cells from HBV transgenic mice.ELISA results showed that L02 cells expressing preS2Ab produced less HBsAg after treatment with the serum of HBV pa-tients than parental L02 cells expressing no preS2Ab.HBV transgenic mice treated with Ad315-preS2Ab had fewer and smaller cancerous nodes after induction with DEN than mice treated with a blank Ad315 vec-tor or untreated mice.Additionally,the administration of Ad315-preS2Ab could alleviate hepatic cirrhosis and decrease the serum levels of alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase.CONCLUSION:Adenovirus-mediated HBV preS2Ab expression could inhibit HBV infection in L02 cells,and then inhibit DEN-induced hepatocellular carcinogenesis and protect hepatic function in HBV transgenic mice.
文摘AIM： To compare intradermal （ID） and intramuscular （IM） booster doses, which have been used in healthy and high risk subjects, such as healthcare workers, haemodialysis patients, human immunodeficiency virus patients, and renal transplant recipients unresponsive to initial hepatitis B vaccination, in celiac individuals. METHODS： We conducted our study on 58 celiac pa- tients, vaccinated in the first year of life, whose blood analysis had showed the absence of protective hepati- tis B virus （HBV） antibodies. All patients had received the last vaccine injection at least one year before study enrolment and they had been on a gluten free diet for at least 1 year. In all patients we randomly performed an HBV vaccine booster dose by ID or IM route. Thirty celiac patients were revaccinated with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine （Engerix B） 2 μg by the ID route, while 28 celiac patients were revaccinated with Engerix B 10 μg by the IM route. Four weeks after every boost- er dose, the anti-hepatitis B surface （HBs） antibody titer was measured by an enzyme-linked immune- adsorbent assay. We performed a maximum of three booster doses in patients with no anti-HBs antibodies after the first or the second vaccine dose. The cut off value for a negative anti-HBs antibody titer was 10 IU/L.Patients with values between 10 and 100 IU/L were considered ＂low responders＂ while patients with an antibody titer higher than 1000 IU/L were considered ＂high responders＂. RESULTS： No significant difference in age, gender, du- ration of illness, and years of gluten intake was found between the two groups. We found a high percent- age of ＂responders＂ after the first booster dose （ID = 76.7%, IM = 78.6%） and a greater increase after the third dose （ID = 90%, IM = 96.4%） of vaccine in both groups. Mloreover we found a significantly higher num- ber of high responders （with an anti-HBs antibody titer 〉 1000 IU/L） in the ID （40%） than in the IM （7.1%） group, and this difference was evident after the first booster dose of vaccination （P 〈 0.01）. No side effects were recorded in performing delivery of the vaccine by either the ID or IM route. CONCLUSION： Our study suggests that both ID and IM routes are effective and safe options to administer a booster dose of HBV vaccine in celiac patients. Howev- er the ID route seems to achieve a greater number of high responders and to have a better cost/benefit ratio.
