The recent introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs(DAAs) for treatment of the hepatitis C virus(HCV) has greatly improved the management of HCV for infected patients. These viral protein inhibitors act rapidly, ...The recent introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs(DAAs) for treatment of the hepatitis C virus(HCV) has greatly improved the management of HCV for infected patients. These viral protein inhibitors act rapidly, allowing HCV clearance and increasing the sustained virological response rates. However, hepatitis B virus(HBV) reactivation has been reported in HCV/HBV co-infected patients. Hepatitis B reactivation refers to an abrupt increase in the HBV and is welldocumented in patients with previously undetected HBV DNA due to inactive or resolved HBV infection. Reactivation can occur spontaneously, but in most cases, it is triggered by various factors. Reactivation can be transient, without clinical symptoms; however, it usually causes a hepatitis flare. HBV reactivation may occur regardless of HCV genotype and type of DAA regimen. HBV screening is strongly recommended for co-infected HCV/HBV patients before initiation and during DAA therapy regardless of HBV status, HCV genotype and class of DAAs used. HBV reactivation can be prevented with pretreatment screening and prophylactic treatment when necessary. Additional data are required to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of HBV reactivation in this setting.展开更多
The majority of individuals exposed to hepatitis C virus(HCV) establish a persistent infection,which is a leading cause of chronic liver disease,cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.Major progress has been made duri...The majority of individuals exposed to hepatitis C virus(HCV) establish a persistent infection,which is a leading cause of chronic liver disease,cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.Major progress has been made during the past twenty-five years in understanding the HCV life cycle and immune responses against HCV infection.Increasing evidence indicates that host genetic factors can significantly influence the outcome of HCV infection and the response to interferon alpha-based antiviral therapy.The arrival of highly effective and convenient treatment regimens for patients chronically infected with HCV has improved prospects for the eradication of HCV worldwide.Clinical trials are evaluating the best anti-viral drug combination,treatment doses and duration.The new treatments are better-tolerated and have shown success rates of more than 95%.However,the recent breakthrough in HCV treatment raises new questions and challenges,including the identification of HCVinfected patients and to link them to appropriate health care,the high pricing of HCV drugs,the emergence of drug resistance or naturally occurring polymorphism in HCV sequences which can compromise HCV treatment response.Finally,we still do not have a vaccine against HCV.In this concise review,we will highlight the progress made in understanding HCV infection and therapy.We will focus on the most significant unsolved problems and the key future challenges in the management of HCV infection.展开更多
AIM To determine whether ribavirin(RBV) concentrations differ according to cirrhosis stage among cirrhotic patients treated with interferon-free regimens. METHODS We included patients with hepatitis C virus and cirrho...AIM To determine whether ribavirin(RBV) concentrations differ according to cirrhosis stage among cirrhotic patients treated with interferon-free regimens. METHODS We included patients with hepatitis C virus and cirrhosis [Child-Pugh(CP) A or B], Glomerular Filtration Rate ≥ 60 mL/min, who started therapy with DAAs and weightbased RBV between October 2014 and February 2016. RBV plasma levels were assessed during the treatment. We focused our analysis on the first 8 wk of therapy. RESULTS We studied 68 patients: 54 with compensated(CP-B) and 14 with decompensated(CP-A) cirrhosis. Patients withdecompensated cirrhosis displayed significantly higher RBV concentrations than those with compensated cirrhosis at week 1, 2, 4 and 8(P < 0.035). RBV levels were positively correlated with Hb loss over the treatment(P < 0.04). Majority(71%) of CP-B patients required a RBV dosage reduction during the treatment. After adjustment for confounders, Child-Pugh class remained significantly associated(95%CI: 35, 348, P = 0.017) to RBV levels, independently from baseline per-Kg RBV dosage. CONCLUSION Liver decompensation might affect RBV clearance leading to an overexposure and increased related toxicities in decompensated cirrhosis. Our findings underscore the importance of an early ribavirin therapeutic drug monitoring and suggest that an initial lower RBV dose, rather than weight-based, might be considered in those with advanced liver disease(CP-B) treated with directacting antivirals.展开更多
AIM To study impact of baseline mental health disease on hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment; and Beck's Depression Inventory(BDI) changes with sofosbuvir- andinterferon-based therapy.METHODS This is a retrospective ...AIM To study impact of baseline mental health disease on hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment; and Beck's Depression Inventory(BDI) changes with sofosbuvir- andinterferon-based therapy.METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of participants from 5 studies enrolled from single center trials conducted at the Clinical Research Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States. All participants were adults with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and na?ve to HCV therapy. Two of the studies included HCV mono-infected participants only(SPARE, SYNERGY-A), and 3 included human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)/HCV co-infected participants only(ERADICATE, PFINPK, and ALBIN). Patients were treated for HCV with 3 different regimens: Sofosbuvir and ribavirin in the SPARE trial, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in SYNERGY-A and ERADICATE trials, and pegylated interferon(IFN) and ribavirin for 48 wk in the PIFNPK and ALBIN trials. Participants with baseline mental health disease(MHD) were identified(defined as either a DSM Ⅳ diagnosis of major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder or requiring anti-depressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers or psychotropics prescribed by a psychiatrist). For our first aim, we compared sustained virologic response(SVR) and adherence(pill counts, study visits, and in 25 patients, blood levels of the sofosbuvir metabolite, GS-331007) within each study. For our second aim, only patients with HIV coinfection were evaluated. BDI scores were obtained pre-treatment, during treatment, and post-treatment among participants treated with sofosbuvir-based therapy, and compared to scores from participants treated with interferon-based therapy. Statistical differences for both aims were analyzed by Fisher's Exact, and t-test with significance defined as a P value less than 0.05.RESULTS Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between all participants with and without MHD groups treated with sofosbuvir-based therapy. Among patients treated with sofosbuvir-based therapy, the percentage of patients with MHD who achieved SVR was the same as those without(SPARE: 60.9% of those MHD compared to 67.6% in those without, P = 0.78; SYNERGY-A: 100% of both groups; ERADICATE: 100% compared to 97.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in pill counts, adherence to study visits between groups, nor mean serum concentrations of GS-331007 for each group at week 2 of treatment(P = 0.72). Among patients with HIV co-infection, pre-treatment BDI scores were similar among patients treated with sofosbuvir, and those treated with interferon(sofosbuvir-based 5.24, IFN-based 6.96; P = 0.14); however, a dichotomous effect on was observed during treatment. Among participants treated with directly acting antiviral(DAA)-based therapy, mean BDI scores decreased from 5.24(pre-treatment) to 3.28 during treatment(1.96 decrease, P = 0.0034) and 2.82 post-treatment. The decrease in mean score from pre- to post-treatment was statistically significant(-2.42, P = 0.0012). Among participants treated with IFN-based therapy, mean BDIscore increased from 6.96 at pre-treatment to 9.19 during treatment(an increase of 2.46 points, P = 0.1), and then decreased back to baseline post-treatment(mean BDI score 6.3, P = 0.54). Overall change in mean BDI scores from pre-treatment to during treatment among participants treated with DAA-based and IFN-therapy was statistically significant(-1.96 and +2.23, respectively; P = 0.0032). This change remained statistically significant when analysis was restricted to participants who achieved SVR(-2.0 and +4.36, respectively; P = 0.0004).CONCLUSION Sofosbuvir-based therapy is safe and well tolerated in patients with MHD. A decline in BDI associated with sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment suggests additional MHD benefits, although the duration of these effects is unknown.展开更多
文摘The recent introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs(DAAs) for treatment of the hepatitis C virus(HCV) has greatly improved the management of HCV for infected patients. These viral protein inhibitors act rapidly, allowing HCV clearance and increasing the sustained virological response rates. However, hepatitis B virus(HBV) reactivation has been reported in HCV/HBV co-infected patients. Hepatitis B reactivation refers to an abrupt increase in the HBV and is welldocumented in patients with previously undetected HBV DNA due to inactive or resolved HBV infection. Reactivation can occur spontaneously, but in most cases, it is triggered by various factors. Reactivation can be transient, without clinical symptoms; however, it usually causes a hepatitis flare. HBV reactivation may occur regardless of HCV genotype and type of DAA regimen. HBV screening is strongly recommended for co-infected HCV/HBV patients before initiation and during DAA therapy regardless of HBV status, HCV genotype and class of DAAs used. HBV reactivation can be prevented with pretreatment screening and prophylactic treatment when necessary. Additional data are required to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of HBV reactivation in this setting.
文摘The majority of individuals exposed to hepatitis C virus(HCV) establish a persistent infection,which is a leading cause of chronic liver disease,cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.Major progress has been made during the past twenty-five years in understanding the HCV life cycle and immune responses against HCV infection.Increasing evidence indicates that host genetic factors can significantly influence the outcome of HCV infection and the response to interferon alpha-based antiviral therapy.The arrival of highly effective and convenient treatment regimens for patients chronically infected with HCV has improved prospects for the eradication of HCV worldwide.Clinical trials are evaluating the best anti-viral drug combination,treatment doses and duration.The new treatments are better-tolerated and have shown success rates of more than 95%.However,the recent breakthrough in HCV treatment raises new questions and challenges,including the identification of HCVinfected patients and to link them to appropriate health care,the high pricing of HCV drugs,the emergence of drug resistance or naturally occurring polymorphism in HCV sequences which can compromise HCV treatment response.Finally,we still do not have a vaccine against HCV.In this concise review,we will highlight the progress made in understanding HCV infection and therapy.We will focus on the most significant unsolved problems and the key future challenges in the management of HCV infection.
文摘AIM To determine whether ribavirin(RBV) concentrations differ according to cirrhosis stage among cirrhotic patients treated with interferon-free regimens. METHODS We included patients with hepatitis C virus and cirrhosis [Child-Pugh(CP) A or B], Glomerular Filtration Rate ≥ 60 mL/min, who started therapy with DAAs and weightbased RBV between October 2014 and February 2016. RBV plasma levels were assessed during the treatment. We focused our analysis on the first 8 wk of therapy. RESULTS We studied 68 patients: 54 with compensated(CP-B) and 14 with decompensated(CP-A) cirrhosis. Patients withdecompensated cirrhosis displayed significantly higher RBV concentrations than those with compensated cirrhosis at week 1, 2, 4 and 8(P < 0.035). RBV levels were positively correlated with Hb loss over the treatment(P < 0.04). Majority(71%) of CP-B patients required a RBV dosage reduction during the treatment. After adjustment for confounders, Child-Pugh class remained significantly associated(95%CI: 35, 348, P = 0.017) to RBV levels, independently from baseline per-Kg RBV dosage. CONCLUSION Liver decompensation might affect RBV clearance leading to an overexposure and increased related toxicities in decompensated cirrhosis. Our findings underscore the importance of an early ribavirin therapeutic drug monitoring and suggest that an initial lower RBV dose, rather than weight-based, might be considered in those with advanced liver disease(CP-B) treated with directacting antivirals.
文摘AIM To study impact of baseline mental health disease on hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment; and Beck's Depression Inventory(BDI) changes with sofosbuvir- andinterferon-based therapy.METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of participants from 5 studies enrolled from single center trials conducted at the Clinical Research Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States. All participants were adults with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and na?ve to HCV therapy. Two of the studies included HCV mono-infected participants only(SPARE, SYNERGY-A), and 3 included human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)/HCV co-infected participants only(ERADICATE, PFINPK, and ALBIN). Patients were treated for HCV with 3 different regimens: Sofosbuvir and ribavirin in the SPARE trial, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in SYNERGY-A and ERADICATE trials, and pegylated interferon(IFN) and ribavirin for 48 wk in the PIFNPK and ALBIN trials. Participants with baseline mental health disease(MHD) were identified(defined as either a DSM Ⅳ diagnosis of major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder or requiring anti-depressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers or psychotropics prescribed by a psychiatrist). For our first aim, we compared sustained virologic response(SVR) and adherence(pill counts, study visits, and in 25 patients, blood levels of the sofosbuvir metabolite, GS-331007) within each study. For our second aim, only patients with HIV coinfection were evaluated. BDI scores were obtained pre-treatment, during treatment, and post-treatment among participants treated with sofosbuvir-based therapy, and compared to scores from participants treated with interferon-based therapy. Statistical differences for both aims were analyzed by Fisher's Exact, and t-test with significance defined as a P value less than 0.05.RESULTS Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between all participants with and without MHD groups treated with sofosbuvir-based therapy. Among patients treated with sofosbuvir-based therapy, the percentage of patients with MHD who achieved SVR was the same as those without(SPARE: 60.9% of those MHD compared to 67.6% in those without, P = 0.78; SYNERGY-A: 100% of both groups; ERADICATE: 100% compared to 97.1%). There was no statistically significant difference in pill counts, adherence to study visits between groups, nor mean serum concentrations of GS-331007 for each group at week 2 of treatment(P = 0.72). Among patients with HIV co-infection, pre-treatment BDI scores were similar among patients treated with sofosbuvir, and those treated with interferon(sofosbuvir-based 5.24, IFN-based 6.96; P = 0.14); however, a dichotomous effect on was observed during treatment. Among participants treated with directly acting antiviral(DAA)-based therapy, mean BDI scores decreased from 5.24(pre-treatment) to 3.28 during treatment(1.96 decrease, P = 0.0034) and 2.82 post-treatment. The decrease in mean score from pre- to post-treatment was statistically significant(-2.42, P = 0.0012). Among participants treated with IFN-based therapy, mean BDIscore increased from 6.96 at pre-treatment to 9.19 during treatment(an increase of 2.46 points, P = 0.1), and then decreased back to baseline post-treatment(mean BDI score 6.3, P = 0.54). Overall change in mean BDI scores from pre-treatment to during treatment among participants treated with DAA-based and IFN-therapy was statistically significant(-1.96 and +2.23, respectively; P = 0.0032). This change remained statistically significant when analysis was restricted to participants who achieved SVR(-2.0 and +4.36, respectively; P = 0.0004).CONCLUSION Sofosbuvir-based therapy is safe and well tolerated in patients with MHD. A decline in BDI associated with sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment suggests additional MHD benefits, although the duration of these effects is unknown.
