Foucault famously questioned the humor, and possibly the deceit, at the heart of Deleuze＇s philosophy by asserting its sincerity and seriousness. In this paper I address how humor and sincerity, and thereby truth and...Foucault famously questioned the humor, and possibly the deceit, at the heart of Deleuze＇s philosophy by asserting its sincerity and seriousness. In this paper I address how humor and sincerity, and thereby truth and falsity, are philosophical concepts at the core of Deleuze＇s thought. Using Deleuze＇s work Difference and Repetition as the focal object of my interrogation, I seek to show how truth and falsity are structured by difference and repetition. Deleuze＇s philosophy of pure difference does not merely try to critique traditional notions of truth, but attempts to define a new model of truth and falsity that bears both differences and repetitions from the previous models in the history of philosophy.展开更多
Kant＇s experience conception is based on scientific knowledge, which makes him missed the question of our inclination or disposition of belief. Even though Kant sustains belief, this belief is just for philosophers. ...Kant＇s experience conception is based on scientific knowledge, which makes him missed the question of our inclination or disposition of belief. Even though Kant sustains belief, this belief is just for philosophers. Facing this predicament, James defines experience conception in another way. In our desire to bring truth to reality, and our passion of belief to act our willingness, James demonstrates our inner experience. And, based on such kind inner experience, James proves the validity of belief.展开更多
文摘Foucault famously questioned the humor, and possibly the deceit, at the heart of Deleuze＇s philosophy by asserting its sincerity and seriousness. In this paper I address how humor and sincerity, and thereby truth and falsity, are philosophical concepts at the core of Deleuze＇s thought. Using Deleuze＇s work Difference and Repetition as the focal object of my interrogation, I seek to show how truth and falsity are structured by difference and repetition. Deleuze＇s philosophy of pure difference does not merely try to critique traditional notions of truth, but attempts to define a new model of truth and falsity that bears both differences and repetitions from the previous models in the history of philosophy.
文摘Kant＇s experience conception is based on scientific knowledge, which makes him missed the question of our inclination or disposition of belief. Even though Kant sustains belief, this belief is just for philosophers. Facing this predicament, James defines experience conception in another way. In our desire to bring truth to reality, and our passion of belief to act our willingness, James demonstrates our inner experience. And, based on such kind inner experience, James proves the validity of belief.
