期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
《庄子》知言观中的道 被引量:1
1
作者 陈清春 《中国哲学史》 CSSCI 2004年第2期35-42,共8页
为了解决道的知与不知和言与不言的矛盾,庄子提出“不知之知”的“真知”观和“不言之言”的“大言”论。他以道知和道言关系为中心,从认识论和语言哲学的角度回答了道的有无、隐显、道物关系等本体论问题,阐释了认识的起源、本质、界... 为了解决道的知与不知和言与不言的矛盾,庄子提出“不知之知”的“真知”观和“不言之言”的“大言”论。他以道知和道言关系为中心,从认识论和语言哲学的角度回答了道的有无、隐显、道物关系等本体论问题,阐释了认识的起源、本质、界限、作用、真妄及语言表达等认识论问题,指出了知、言、道关系的人生实践意义,并最终把知与言解释为道的存在。 展开更多
关键词 《庄子》 知言观 “道” 道家思想 真知思想
下载PDF
上博简《孔子见季桓子》第22简中的“吾子”探赜——兼论孔子的“知言”观 被引量:1
2
作者 雷黎明 《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2009年第5期143-147,共5页
上博简《孔子见季桓子》篇第22简二见"吾子",从目前所见释读意见来看,"吾子"所指为何有待商榷。"吾子"在先秦文献中较少用于对话双方互称;该篇别简季桓子称呼孔子为"子",孔子称呼季桓子为"... 上博简《孔子见季桓子》篇第22简二见"吾子",从目前所见释读意见来看,"吾子"所指为何有待商榷。"吾子"在先秦文献中较少用于对话双方互称;该篇别简季桓子称呼孔子为"子",孔子称呼季桓子为"吾子",判然有别;且从对几个关键疑难字的释读,全简的重新句读和理解来看,此简二处"吾子"当皆为孔子称呼季桓子之语。简文孔子阐述了在位者不当使民"迷言",体现了孔子的"知言"观。 展开更多
关键词 孔子 季桓子 第22简 “吾子” 知言
下载PDF
Metonymy Research in Cognitive Linguistics
3
作者 LUO Rui-feng 《Journal of Literature and Art Studies》 2018年第3期445-451,共7页
Centuries of rhetorical and literary studies have strongly been influencing the cognitive understanding of metonymy. Many different classifications of tropes have been proposed. Some subsume metonymy and synecdoche un... Centuries of rhetorical and literary studies have strongly been influencing the cognitive understanding of metonymy. Many different classifications of tropes have been proposed. Some subsume metonymy and synecdoche under metaphor while the other classify it under synecdoche. The paper overviews the main researches on metonymy in west countries and in China since 1980s from cognitive perspective. 展开更多
关键词 METONYMY RHETORICAL Trope COGNITIVE
下载PDF
An Article Review: Impact of Explicit Instruction on EFL Learners' Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: A Case of English Relative Clauses
4
作者 Sami Alsalmi 《Journal of Literature and Art Studies》 2017年第9期1214-1222,共9页
This review discusses Nezakat-Alhossaini, Youhanaee, and Moinzadeh's research study entitled "Impact of Explicit Instruction on EFL Learners' Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: A Case of English Relative Clauses." ... This review discusses Nezakat-Alhossaini, Youhanaee, and Moinzadeh's research study entitled "Impact of Explicit Instruction on EFL Learners' Implicit and Explicit Knowledge: A Case of English Relative Clauses." This study was chosen for evaluation because it strives to attach significance to explicit instruction in L2 acquisition, unlike other more recent research, which seeks to reinforce implicit instruction as it is viewed as the idealistic goal of language learning (Rebuschat & William, 2009). The present review will be developed by means of an evaluation of Alhossaini and her colleagues' study, consisting of a concise summary of the study, a classification of the philosophical perspective, the selection of criteria, and the strengths and weaknesses of the study. In this review, I hope that I succeed to broadly navigate the research enterprise, commencing with the philosophical perspective of research, such as the epistemological and ontological stances shaping the philosophical perspective and then colouring the research. By reviewing this study, I would also hope that I successfully evaluate the research quality by using appropriate criteria in an attempt to suggest potential directions for further research (under strengths and weaknesses of the study). 展开更多
关键词 implicit knowledge explicit instruction .implicit knowledge relative clauses
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部