The authors investigate the comparative classification performance of the two groups linear classification techniques. They compared the Fisher linear classification analysis, its robust version based on the minimum c...The authors investigate the comparative classification performance of the two groups linear classification techniques. They compared the Fisher linear classification analysis, its robust version based on the minimum covariance determinant with the Filter linear classification rule and the linear combination linear classification technique. These procedures are investigated using laboratory reared aedes albopictus mosquito data set and simulated data set generated based on heteroscedastic covariance matrices with various proportion of contamination. The evaluation procedure is based on the effect of contamination on the mean probabilities of correct classification obtain for each technique. The comparative analysis revealed that the robust Fisher linear classification rule and the linear combination linear classification rule are robust and comparable than the other procedures.展开更多
文摘The authors investigate the comparative classification performance of the two groups linear classification techniques. They compared the Fisher linear classification analysis, its robust version based on the minimum covariance determinant with the Filter linear classification rule and the linear combination linear classification technique. These procedures are investigated using laboratory reared aedes albopictus mosquito data set and simulated data set generated based on heteroscedastic covariance matrices with various proportion of contamination. The evaluation procedure is based on the effect of contamination on the mean probabilities of correct classification obtain for each technique. The comparative analysis revealed that the robust Fisher linear classification rule and the linear combination linear classification rule are robust and comparable than the other procedures.