期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
基于漏斗胸Nuss术后钢板置入期间胸廓外形矫形评价及相关因素分析
1
作者 卞军 施伟栋 +6 位作者 丁文泽 蔡慧强 张向宁 魏强 陈伯林 王渝忻 赵帅宇 《中华胸心血管外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第10期610-614,共5页
目的通过漏斗胸患儿Nuss术后钢板置入期间胸廓外形矫形评价,探讨并分析Nuss术前相关因素对术后矫形评价的影响。方法2012年4月至2019年4月,西安市儿童医院接收Nuss手术的漏斗胸患者159例,年龄3.2~17.0岁,平均(6.8±3.4)岁;男124例,... 目的通过漏斗胸患儿Nuss术后钢板置入期间胸廓外形矫形评价,探讨并分析Nuss术前相关因素对术后矫形评价的影响。方法2012年4月至2019年4月,西安市儿童医院接收Nuss手术的漏斗胸患者159例,年龄3.2~17.0岁,平均(6.8±3.4)岁;男124例,女35例;Haller指数2.7~7.5,平均(4.0±1.0);其中6例(4%)术后胸廓外形矫形评价差,男5例,女1例;23例(14%)术后胸廓外形矫形评价良,男16例,女7例;130例(82%)术后胸廓外形矫形评价优,男103例,女27例。随访至少2年。回顾性分析术后胸廓矫形评价与患儿的年龄、性别、Haller指数、手术中钢板放置的方式、漏斗胸对称与否的关系,并采用t检验和χ^(2)检验对其进行统计学分析。结果漏斗胸术后胸廓矫形评价与漏斗胸分型统计学分析显示差异有统计学意义(P=0.001),即不对称漏斗胸术后矫形评价差;患者性别、Haller指数、手术中钢板放置方式差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但随着年龄减小,矫形评价逐渐变差,随着Haller指数增加,矫形评价开始变差。结论不对称漏斗胸患儿是Nuss术后钢板置入期间矫形评价差的主要风险因素,特别是小年龄患儿和Haller指数较大的患儿。 展开更多
关键词 漏斗胸 术后 胸廓外形 矫形评价 风险因素
原文传递
Irritable bowel syndrome treated by traditional Chinese spinal orthopedic manipulation 被引量:6
2
作者 Liuxin Qu Liyang Xing +2 位作者 Wanda Norman Hong Chen Song Gao 《Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第4期565-570,共6页
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical effect of traditional Chinese spinal orthopedic manipulation(TCSOM) in treating irritable bowel syndrome(IBS) compared with pinaverium bromide Dicetel(PBD),and to assess a possible c... OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical effect of traditional Chinese spinal orthopedic manipulation(TCSOM) in treating irritable bowel syndrome(IBS) compared with pinaverium bromide Dicetel(PBD),and to assess a possible cause for IBS.METHODS:Two hundred ten IBS patients were randomly divided into the TCSOM group and the PBD group.All patients in the TCSOM group were treated with spinal manipulations 5 times.Pain intensity was assessed on a visual analogue scale and symptoms were evaluated based on bowel symptom scale(BSS) scores before and after treatment.A symptom improvement rating(SIR) was implemented to evaluate the effects of treatment,and to statistically compare theTCSOM and PBD groups.RESULTS:Post-treatment subjective assessment for the TCSOM treatment group showed that 92 cases had excellent results,10 cases had good results,3 cases had fair results,and 0 cases had poor results.In the PBD group,30 cases had excellent results,41 cases had good results,12 cases had fair results,and 22 cases had poor results.According to the SIR,which was based on the BSS,the TCSOM group included 92 cases with excellent results,10 cases with good results and 3 cases with poor results.There were no adverse side effects from treatment.Based on the BSS,the PBD group had 30 cases with excellent results,41 cases with good results,and 34 cases with poor results.We found that the symptom rating in the BSS in the TCSOM group showed a more significant improvement,such as a reduction in the severity and frequency of symptoms,compared with that in the PBD group(P<0.001).CONCLUSION:Displacement of intervertebral discs and/or vertebra in the thoracic or lumbar region appears to be a contributing factor in the symptoms of IBS.Correcting this displacement of intervertebral discs and/or vertebra to resolve the stimuli caused by pressure exerted on the nerves and vessels around the spine is an effective treatment for IBS. 展开更多
关键词 Irritable bowel syndrome Manipula-tion orthopedic Intervertebral disk displacement Bowel symptom scale
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部