期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
论专家评价的社会溢价
1
作者 韩冰 《科教导刊》 2013年第17期168-169,共2页
近年来,专家越来越多的参与到我们的社会生活、经济建设中来,一些专家评价在委托关系之外,被广泛的传播与使用,导致了专家评价的外部性和某种意义上的"社会溢价",这种"社会溢价"效应恰恰是专家评价深得公众信赖的... 近年来,专家越来越多的参与到我们的社会生活、经济建设中来,一些专家评价在委托关系之外,被广泛的传播与使用,导致了专家评价的外部性和某种意义上的"社会溢价",这种"社会溢价"效应恰恰是专家评价深得公众信赖的最重要的根源之一。本文针对专家评价的溢价效应进行了初步分析,认为我们应该对专家评价的社会溢价效应进行有效的引导,鼓励专家的学术评价,依照行业特点建立各行业专家的法律责任体系,并逐渐促成公众对专家评价的合理预期。 展开更多
关键词 专家评 外部性 社会溢价 公众预期
下载PDF
Structural Reform Holds the Key to Reducing Social Financing Cost
2
作者 温信祥 《China Economist》 2015年第6期56-64,共9页
In the last couple of years, social financing costs have shot up in China despite an overall capital abundance and increasing market-based capital allocation. This paper has investigated overall financial cost and cap... In the last couple of years, social financing costs have shot up in China despite an overall capital abundance and increasing market-based capital allocation. This paper has investigated overall financial cost and capital cost ratio as two measurements of financing cost, compared financing costs of different channels, examined the relationship of risk premium, financial repression, interest rate liberalization, and resource occupation versus financing cost, and addressed the problem of high non-manufacturing cost. On such a basis, specific countermeasures have been proposed. The main conclusion of this paper is: The current high social financing costs primarily result from economic structural imbalance. The fundamental solution lies in continuing structural reform and credibility system development to eliminate barriers in the transmission of capital circulation policies such as expanding equity financing, relaxing market access formalities for small and micro financial institutions, and improving the bankruptcy system to give full play to the "survival of the fittest" mechanism of the market. 展开更多
关键词 social financing cost structural imbalance private financing interest rateliberalization
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部