Jejunal diverticulosis is a rare entity with variable clinical and anatomical presentations.Its reported incidence varies from 0.05% to 6%.Although there is no consensus on the management of asymptomatic jejunal diver...Jejunal diverticulosis is a rare entity with variable clinical and anatomical presentations.Its reported incidence varies from 0.05% to 6%.Although there is no consensus on the management of asymptomatic jejunal diverticular disease,some complications are potentially life threatening and require early surgical treatment.We report a case of an 88-year-old man investigated for acute abdominal pain with a high biological inflammatory syndrome.Inflammation of multiple giant jejunal diverticulum was discovered at abdominal computed tomography (CT).As a result of the clinical and biological signs of early peritonitis,an emergency surgical exploration was performed.The first jejunal loop showed clear signs of jejunal diverticulitis.Primary segmental jejunum resection with end-to-end anastomosis was performed.Histopathology report confirmed an ulcerative jejunal diverticulitis with imminent perforation and acute local peritonitis.The patient made an excellent rapid postoperative recovery.Jejunal diverticulum is rare but may cause serious complications.It should be considered a possible etiology of acute abdomen,especially in elderly patients with unusual symptomatology.Abdominal CT is the diagnostic tool of choice.The best treatment is emergency surgical management.展开更多
AIM:To study and provide data on the evolution of medical procedures and outcomes of patients suffering from perforated midgut diverticulitis. METHODS:Three data sources were used:the Medline and Google search engines...AIM:To study and provide data on the evolution of medical procedures and outcomes of patients suffering from perforated midgut diverticulitis. METHODS:Three data sources were used:the Medline and Google search engines were searched for case reports on one or more patients treated for perforated midgut diverticulitis (Meckel's diverticulitis excluded) that were published after 1995. The inclusion criterion was sufficient individual patient data in the article. Both indexed and non-indexed journals were used. Patients treated for perforated midgut diverticulitis at Vestfold Hospital were included in this group. Data on symptoms, laboratory and radiology results, treatment modalities, surgical access, procedures, complications and outcomes were collected. The Norwegian patient registry was searched to find patients operated upon for midgut diverticulitis from 1999 to 2007. The data collected were age, sex, mode of access, surgical procedure performed and number of patients per year. Historical controls were retrieved from an article published in 1995 containing pertinent individual patient data. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software.RESULTS:GroupⅠ:106 patients (48 men) were found. Mean age was 72.2 ± 13.1 years (mean ± SD). Age or sex had no impact on outcomes (P = 0.057 and P = 0.771, respectively). Preoperative assessment was plain radiography in 53.3% or computed tomography (CT) in 76.1%. Correct diagnosis was made in 77.1% with CT, 5.6% without (P = 0.001). Duration of symptoms before hospitalization was 3.6 d (range:1-35 d), but longer duration was not associated with poor outcome (P = 0.748). Eighty-six point eight percent of patients underwent surgery, 92.4% of these through open access where 90.1% had bowel resection. Complications occurred in 19.2% of patients and 16.3% underwent reoperation. Distance from perforation to Treitz ligament was 41.7 ± 28.1 cm. At surgery, no peritonitis was found in 29.7% of patients, local peritonitis in 47.5%, and diffuse peritonitis in 22.8%. Peritonitis grade correlated with the reoperation rate (r = 0.43). Conservatively treated patients had similar hospital length of stay as operated patients (10.6 ± 8.3 d vs 10.7 ± 7.9 d, respectively). Age correlated with hospital stay (r = 0.46). No difference in outcomes for operated or nonoperated patients was found (P = 0.814). Group Ⅱ:113 patients (57 men). Mean age 67.6 ± 16.4 years (range: 21-96 years). Mean age for men was 61.3 ± 16.2 years, and 74.7 ± 12.5 years for women (P = 0.001). Number of procedures per year was 11.2 ± 0.9, and bowel resection was performed in 82.3% of patients. Group Ⅲ: 47 patients (21 men). Patient age was 65.4 ± 14.4 years. Mean age for men was 61.5 ± 17.3 years and 65.3 ± 14.4 years for women. Duration of symptoms before hospitalization was 6.9 d (range: 1-180 d). No patients had a preoperative diagnosis, 97.9% of patients underwent surgery, and 78.3% had multiple diverticula. Bowel resection was performed in 67.4% of patients, and suture closure in 32.6%. Mortality was 23.4%. There was no difference in length of history or its impact on survival between Groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ (P = 0.241 and P = 0.198, respectively). Resection was more often performed in Group Ⅰ (P = 0.01). Mortality was higher in Group Ⅲ (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In cases with contained perforation, conservative treatment gives satisfactory results, laparosco-py with lavage and drainage can be attempted and continued with a conservative course.展开更多
文摘Jejunal diverticulosis is a rare entity with variable clinical and anatomical presentations.Its reported incidence varies from 0.05% to 6%.Although there is no consensus on the management of asymptomatic jejunal diverticular disease,some complications are potentially life threatening and require early surgical treatment.We report a case of an 88-year-old man investigated for acute abdominal pain with a high biological inflammatory syndrome.Inflammation of multiple giant jejunal diverticulum was discovered at abdominal computed tomography (CT).As a result of the clinical and biological signs of early peritonitis,an emergency surgical exploration was performed.The first jejunal loop showed clear signs of jejunal diverticulitis.Primary segmental jejunum resection with end-to-end anastomosis was performed.Histopathology report confirmed an ulcerative jejunal diverticulitis with imminent perforation and acute local peritonitis.The patient made an excellent rapid postoperative recovery.Jejunal diverticulum is rare but may cause serious complications.It should be considered a possible etiology of acute abdomen,especially in elderly patients with unusual symptomatology.Abdominal CT is the diagnostic tool of choice.The best treatment is emergency surgical management.
文摘AIM:To study and provide data on the evolution of medical procedures and outcomes of patients suffering from perforated midgut diverticulitis. METHODS:Three data sources were used:the Medline and Google search engines were searched for case reports on one or more patients treated for perforated midgut diverticulitis (Meckel's diverticulitis excluded) that were published after 1995. The inclusion criterion was sufficient individual patient data in the article. Both indexed and non-indexed journals were used. Patients treated for perforated midgut diverticulitis at Vestfold Hospital were included in this group. Data on symptoms, laboratory and radiology results, treatment modalities, surgical access, procedures, complications and outcomes were collected. The Norwegian patient registry was searched to find patients operated upon for midgut diverticulitis from 1999 to 2007. The data collected were age, sex, mode of access, surgical procedure performed and number of patients per year. Historical controls were retrieved from an article published in 1995 containing pertinent individual patient data. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software.RESULTS:GroupⅠ:106 patients (48 men) were found. Mean age was 72.2 ± 13.1 years (mean ± SD). Age or sex had no impact on outcomes (P = 0.057 and P = 0.771, respectively). Preoperative assessment was plain radiography in 53.3% or computed tomography (CT) in 76.1%. Correct diagnosis was made in 77.1% with CT, 5.6% without (P = 0.001). Duration of symptoms before hospitalization was 3.6 d (range:1-35 d), but longer duration was not associated with poor outcome (P = 0.748). Eighty-six point eight percent of patients underwent surgery, 92.4% of these through open access where 90.1% had bowel resection. Complications occurred in 19.2% of patients and 16.3% underwent reoperation. Distance from perforation to Treitz ligament was 41.7 ± 28.1 cm. At surgery, no peritonitis was found in 29.7% of patients, local peritonitis in 47.5%, and diffuse peritonitis in 22.8%. Peritonitis grade correlated with the reoperation rate (r = 0.43). Conservatively treated patients had similar hospital length of stay as operated patients (10.6 ± 8.3 d vs 10.7 ± 7.9 d, respectively). Age correlated with hospital stay (r = 0.46). No difference in outcomes for operated or nonoperated patients was found (P = 0.814). Group Ⅱ:113 patients (57 men). Mean age 67.6 ± 16.4 years (range: 21-96 years). Mean age for men was 61.3 ± 16.2 years, and 74.7 ± 12.5 years for women (P = 0.001). Number of procedures per year was 11.2 ± 0.9, and bowel resection was performed in 82.3% of patients. Group Ⅲ: 47 patients (21 men). Patient age was 65.4 ± 14.4 years. Mean age for men was 61.5 ± 17.3 years and 65.3 ± 14.4 years for women. Duration of symptoms before hospitalization was 6.9 d (range: 1-180 d). No patients had a preoperative diagnosis, 97.9% of patients underwent surgery, and 78.3% had multiple diverticula. Bowel resection was performed in 67.4% of patients, and suture closure in 32.6%. Mortality was 23.4%. There was no difference in length of history or its impact on survival between Groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ (P = 0.241 and P = 0.198, respectively). Resection was more often performed in Group Ⅰ (P = 0.01). Mortality was higher in Group Ⅲ (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In cases with contained perforation, conservative treatment gives satisfactory results, laparosco-py with lavage and drainage can be attempted and continued with a conservative course.
