“郑亳说”立论前提辨析

In academic circles, there appeared the theory taking the Shang city at Zhengzhou as Tang's capital Bo. Its precondition goes as follows: If the Yanshi Erlitou site was the city of Bo built by the Shang ruler Tang in the pre-dynastic Shang period and continued to be his capital after he conquered the Xia Dynasty, then it would contradict related literal records. According to historical documents, Shang Tang's capital Bo was to the east of Xia Jie's capital and Tang launched his expedition against the Xia from Bo and then returned to Bo in triumph. Just with this precondition the arguers believe that, since Jie' s capital can be located at Yanshi, surely Tang' s capital must have not been at Yanshi and should be sought for to its east. Actually there is no documentary evidence of the idea that Shang Tang built only one capital and lived in the same capital before and after his conquering the Xia Dynasty. It is all wrong to negate the possibility that Tang may have built more than one capital, that he may have built a new capital near the Xia' s capital after his conquering the Xia and that Tang' s capital Xibo (Western Bo) may have been at Yanshi. Therefore, the hypothesis taking the Shang city at Zhengzhou as the Shang capital Bo is unacceptable for its inborn defects.

“塔西佗陷阱”并不是塔西佗本人提出的——关于“塔西佗陷阱”的正本溯源

“塔西佗陷阱”并不是直接来自塔西佗本人。迄今为止,不但在全世界的英语、法语、德语等各个语种中都寻觅不到对应的术语,不但塔西佗本人也从来就没有说到过“塔西佗陷阱”,而且,在他的原话中希望告诫的也是臣民,而不是皇帝。显然,塔西佗原话的主旨其实是与“塔西佗陷阱”的涵义恰恰相反的。“塔西佗陷阱”与塔西佗本人的原话的立论前提不同,提出的语境也不同。因此,“塔西佗陷阱”并不是塔西佗本人提出的。“塔西佗陷阱”是由中国学者首次提出,也是中国学者为世界人文社会科学话语建构所作出的重要贡献。

新时期强化党内监督的实现路径

新形势下强化党内监督,应破除对党内监督的模糊认识,充分发挥党内监督的立体职能,以新政治观指导党内监督的立论前提,树立正确的权力观和权力监督思想。面对多种监督主体和新兴监督方式,要以实际效能体现党内监督的核心地位,深刻认识制度监督的内涵,以制度监督推进党内监督科学化。

新时期强化党内监督的实现路径

新形势下强化党内监督,应破除对党内监督的模糊认识,充分发挥党内监督的立体职能;以新政治观指导党内监督的立论前提,树立正确的权力观和权力监督思想。面对多种监督主体和新兴监督方式,要以实际效能体现党内监督的核心地位,深刻认识制度监督的内涵,以制度监督推进党内监督科学化。