Objective Bronchoscopy has been extensively used in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases, and par- ticularly, malignant diseases. However, endoscopists do not normally perform bronchoscopic biopsy in Case lesions are...Objective Bronchoscopy has been extensively used in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases, and par- ticularly, malignant diseases. However, endoscopists do not normally perform bronchoscopic biopsy in Case lesions are undetected via bronchoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing bron- choscopic biopsy could be established in the diagnosis of lung cancer in case of endobronchial abnormali- ties undetectable to the naked eye. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 109 cases between January 2008 and December 2012. The in- clusion criteria were confirmed lung cancer diagnosis, transbronchial biopsy performed in the absence of visible endobronchial manifestations, brushing, and bronchoalveolar lavage （BAL） according to the images obtained from high-resolution computed tomography （HRCT）. Data regarding age, sex, pathology, tumor stage; the method of diagnosis; location of primary lesion （central, peripheral, or intermediate）; tumor size, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the serum carcinoembryonic antigen （CEA） value were collected. The Pearson chi-square test or Fisher＇s exact and McNemar tests were used in the univadate analysis. Results Among the 109 patients, the diagnosis of 37 （33.9%） patients was confirmed through bronchos- copy. Brushing and BAL had higher positive detection rates than biopsy （P = 0.004）. There were no differ- ences in the positive detection rates between the sex, pathology, lesion location, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and the serum CEA value （P〈 0.05 for all groups）. Conclusion Despite the normal appearance of the endobronchial manifestations, lesions undetectable by bronchoscopy could be indicated. Therefore, we suggest performing bronchoscopic biopsy and that brushing and BAL might increase the positive detection rate of bronchoscepic examination.展开更多
文摘Objective Bronchoscopy has been extensively used in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases, and par- ticularly, malignant diseases. However, endoscopists do not normally perform bronchoscopic biopsy in Case lesions are undetected via bronchoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing bron- choscopic biopsy could be established in the diagnosis of lung cancer in case of endobronchial abnormali- ties undetectable to the naked eye. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 109 cases between January 2008 and December 2012. The in- clusion criteria were confirmed lung cancer diagnosis, transbronchial biopsy performed in the absence of visible endobronchial manifestations, brushing, and bronchoalveolar lavage （BAL） according to the images obtained from high-resolution computed tomography （HRCT）. Data regarding age, sex, pathology, tumor stage; the method of diagnosis; location of primary lesion （central, peripheral, or intermediate）; tumor size, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the serum carcinoembryonic antigen （CEA） value were collected. The Pearson chi-square test or Fisher＇s exact and McNemar tests were used in the univadate analysis. Results Among the 109 patients, the diagnosis of 37 （33.9%） patients was confirmed through bronchos- copy. Brushing and BAL had higher positive detection rates than biopsy （P = 0.004）. There were no differ- ences in the positive detection rates between the sex, pathology, lesion location, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and the serum CEA value （P〈 0.05 for all groups）. Conclusion Despite the normal appearance of the endobronchial manifestations, lesions undetectable by bronchoscopy could be indicated. Therefore, we suggest performing bronchoscopic biopsy and that brushing and BAL might increase the positive detection rate of bronchoscepic examination.
