认知诊断评估的重要一环是构建符合约束(统计约束与非统计约束)的诊断测验。其中构建测验的认知诊断自动测验组卷(cognitive diagnosis automated test assembly,CD-ATA)方法十分关键,受到广泛关注。文章通过梳理有关CD-ATA的研究,从组...认知诊断评估的重要一环是构建符合约束(统计约束与非统计约束)的诊断测验。其中构建测验的认知诊断自动测验组卷(cognitive diagnosis automated test assembly,CD-ATA)方法十分关键,受到广泛关注。文章通过梳理有关CD-ATA的研究,从组卷方法的类别、开发思路、组卷过程、方法对比及选用进行阐述与评析。最后,在已有方法基础上指出未来可从融合测验设计、非参数组卷、平行测验组卷、开发组卷软件、开展实证研究五个方面进行研究与探讨。展开更多
Based on the undertaken research, it is explored whether power can affect the judgment made by individual about unethical behavior. Research 1 uses questionnaire as measuring method. The results demonstrate that indiv...Based on the undertaken research, it is explored whether power can affect the judgment made by individual about unethical behavior. Research 1 uses questionnaire as measuring method. The results demonstrate that individuals with different levels of power make judgment on various unethical behaviors. Their judgments are not different. It does not agree with the hypothesis. The reason may lie in that it may be affected by social desirability, or that there exist defects in the design of questionnaire. Research 2 uses laboratory investigation. The results demonstrate that individuals in high-power group conduct unethical behavior more frequently and more fiercely. It agrees with the hypothesis. The inconsistent results of the two researches can be reasonably explained from the two angles of moral permission and moral hypocrisy.展开更多
文摘认知诊断评估的重要一环是构建符合约束(统计约束与非统计约束)的诊断测验。其中构建测验的认知诊断自动测验组卷(cognitive diagnosis automated test assembly,CD-ATA)方法十分关键,受到广泛关注。文章通过梳理有关CD-ATA的研究,从组卷方法的类别、开发思路、组卷过程、方法对比及选用进行阐述与评析。最后,在已有方法基础上指出未来可从融合测验设计、非参数组卷、平行测验组卷、开发组卷软件、开展实证研究五个方面进行研究与探讨。
文摘Based on the undertaken research, it is explored whether power can affect the judgment made by individual about unethical behavior. Research 1 uses questionnaire as measuring method. The results demonstrate that individuals with different levels of power make judgment on various unethical behaviors. Their judgments are not different. It does not agree with the hypothesis. The reason may lie in that it may be affected by social desirability, or that there exist defects in the design of questionnaire. Research 2 uses laboratory investigation. The results demonstrate that individuals in high-power group conduct unethical behavior more frequently and more fiercely. It agrees with the hypothesis. The inconsistent results of the two researches can be reasonably explained from the two angles of moral permission and moral hypocrisy.
