期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
先唐文学文本的“完整性”与“碎片化”——兼论文学文本的“不可靠性”问题 被引量:3
1
作者 孙少华 《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期24-34,共11页
在中国古代特殊的学术环境中,文学文献多数脱胎于经史文献。经史与文学文本都具有"完整性"与"碎片化"特征,这使"原始文本"不断衍生出多层次的"次生文本",从而造成了文本的"不可靠性"... 在中国古代特殊的学术环境中,文学文献多数脱胎于经史文献。经史与文学文本都具有"完整性"与"碎片化"特征,这使"原始文本"不断衍生出多层次的"次生文本",从而造成了文本的"不可靠性"。但是,文本的"可靠"与"不可靠"是相对的。对文学而言,"完整性"与"碎片化",恰恰是文学文本产生的主要动因。文学文本的研究有其特殊规律,"不可靠性"并不妨碍文学研究的进行。 展开更多
关键词 “完整性” “碎片化” 经史文本 文学文本 “不可靠性”
下载PDF
A Twofold Perspective on Research on Marx and Engels' Classic Texts
2
作者 陈先达 Kang Xiaoni 《Social Sciences in China》 2015年第3期5-19,共15页
Study of the classic texts of Marx and Engels should employ two perspectives: Marxist philosophical history and Marxist philosophical principles. The two cannot be separated, still less contradictory. In dealing crea... Study of the classic texts of Marx and Engels should employ two perspectives: Marxist philosophical history and Marxist philosophical principles. The two cannot be separated, still less contradictory. In dealing creatively with these classic works, we must firmly uphold the methodology of historical materialism, read them in accordance with the authors' original intentions and approach them creatively. We need to oppose research styles that place undue emphasis on the researcher's own interpretations and constructions. Research on Marxist philosophy should develop on the basis of respect, study and correct understanding of Marx and Engels' classic works; different readings of these texts must not be allowed to construct a pluralist Marxism. This is of great importance for consolidating the leading position of Marxism in the sphere of ideology. 展开更多
关键词 classic works of Marx and Engels history of Marxist philosophy principles of Marxist philosophy historical materialism
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部