联合国亚洲及太平洋经济与社会理事会(United Nations Economic and SocialCommission for Asia and the Pacific-UNESCAP,简称“亚太经社会”)是联合国的一个区域性机构,它是联合国经济社会理事会下属的五个区域委员会之一,是亚太地区...联合国亚洲及太平洋经济与社会理事会(United Nations Economic and SocialCommission for Asia and the Pacific-UNESCAP,简称“亚太经社会”)是联合国的一个区域性机构,它是联合国经济社会理事会下属的五个区域委员会之一,是亚太地区建立最早、代表性最为广泛的政府间多边经济社会发展组织。亚太经社会前身是亚洲和远东经济委员会(亚远经委会),它是第二次世界大战期间,为促进亚洲经济的重建和发展,根据中国倡议和联合国经社理事会决议于1947年3月在上海成立的。1949年6月该组织由上海迁到泰国首都曼谷,1970年将会址正式设在曼谷。1974年该组织通过决议改称亚洲及太平洋经济社会委员会。作为亚太地区最大的政府间多边组织。展开更多
Both the European Union （EU） and China are culturally, economically, climatologically and environmentally diverse polities. The EU is a multi-state grouping of economically developed democratic countries, while Chin...Both the European Union （EU） and China are culturally, economically, climatologically and environmentally diverse polities. The EU is a multi-state grouping of economically developed democratic countries, while China is a unitary sovereign state and a developing economy with a strong government bureaucracy. Our hypothesis is that given their diverse political systems, the EU and China would develop different kinds of systems for the governance of adaptation to climate change. We test this hypothesis through a comparative analysis of policy documents from the two study areas, in which we examine framework policies, programmatic actions and specific actions that have been adopted to date in order to address climate change, with a specific focus on the water sector. We find that climate change adaptation began to be addressed through formal policy on a similar timeline in the two regions. The EU and China are also similar in that they use framework laws and existing sectoral policy, such as for the water sector. We find that the EU has primarily relied on integration of climate change adaptation concerns through legal instruments which set a framework for implementation of adaptation policy. In China, specific actions to be incorporated in socio-economic development plans under the existing legislation on adaptation have been the main mode for integrating adaptation into sectoral actions, though the future trend may be to develop more regulations.展开更多
文摘联合国亚洲及太平洋经济与社会理事会(United Nations Economic and SocialCommission for Asia and the Pacific-UNESCAP,简称“亚太经社会”)是联合国的一个区域性机构,它是联合国经济社会理事会下属的五个区域委员会之一,是亚太地区建立最早、代表性最为广泛的政府间多边经济社会发展组织。亚太经社会前身是亚洲和远东经济委员会(亚远经委会),它是第二次世界大战期间,为促进亚洲经济的重建和发展,根据中国倡议和联合国经社理事会决议于1947年3月在上海成立的。1949年6月该组织由上海迁到泰国首都曼谷,1970年将会址正式设在曼谷。1974年该组织通过决议改称亚洲及太平洋经济社会委员会。作为亚太地区最大的政府间多边组织。
基金supported by the National Basic Research Program of China(2010CB428401)the Special Fund for Climate Change of the CMA(CCSF-09-16)
文摘Both the European Union （EU） and China are culturally, economically, climatologically and environmentally diverse polities. The EU is a multi-state grouping of economically developed democratic countries, while China is a unitary sovereign state and a developing economy with a strong government bureaucracy. Our hypothesis is that given their diverse political systems, the EU and China would develop different kinds of systems for the governance of adaptation to climate change. We test this hypothesis through a comparative analysis of policy documents from the two study areas, in which we examine framework policies, programmatic actions and specific actions that have been adopted to date in order to address climate change, with a specific focus on the water sector. We find that climate change adaptation began to be addressed through formal policy on a similar timeline in the two regions. The EU and China are also similar in that they use framework laws and existing sectoral policy, such as for the water sector. We find that the EU has primarily relied on integration of climate change adaptation concerns through legal instruments which set a framework for implementation of adaptation policy. In China, specific actions to be incorporated in socio-economic development plans under the existing legislation on adaptation have been the main mode for integrating adaptation into sectoral actions, though the future trend may be to develop more regulations.
