中医推拿结合经络敷贴治疗小儿腹泻的临床疗效分析

选用样本数据进行分组对比研究以得出中医推拿结合经络敷贴在治疗小儿腹泻的具体临床效果。方法 随机地从我院2022年4月至2024年4月之间接诊治疗的小儿腹泻患者60例作为本次的研究对象,按照摸球法将其平均地分为两组,每组30例患儿,分别命名为实验组和对照组,对照组患儿采用口服蒙脱石散进行治疗,而实验组患儿则采用了中医推拿结合经络敷贴治疗。治疗完毕后,对比两组患儿治疗前后大便的次数、治疗结束后15天大便次数以及治疗前后的全身症状改善情况。结果 治疗前两组患儿的大便次数以及小儿腹泻症状体征量化表评分并没有太大的差异,治疗后两组患儿的各项指标差异不大,但均较治疗前有所好转。在接受治疗15天后,实验组患儿的各项指标优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对小儿腹泻患者采用中医推拿结合经络敷贴治疗有着很好的效果,可以改善患儿的整体症状,长期止泻效果良好,方法 可在临床中推广应用。

经络穴位贴敷联合康复理疗对脾胃虚弱患者功能恢复的观察及分析

分析对脾胃虚弱患者提供经络穴位贴敷联合康复理疗干预的意义。方法 选取2022年12月至2023年12月期间来本院诊治的脾胃虚弱型胃炎患者(共60例),利用电脑抽号法分为研究组、常规组,分别接受经络穴位贴敷联合康复理疗干预、常规治疗,各30例,之后对两组患者的功能恢复情况加以观察。结果 研究组患者的不良反应发生率、中医证候积分、症状消失时间与治疗总时间、胃肠动力指标更低(p均<0.05)。结论 对于脾胃虚弱患者而言,为其提供经络穴位贴敷联合康复理疗干预,这种方式的效果更佳。

经络穴位贴敷联合制大黄、芒硝、厚朴粉治疗老年功能性便秘的疗效分析

探讨分析针对老年功能性便秘采用经络穴位贴敷联合制大黄、芒硝、厚朴粉来治疗后的临床疗效。方法:抽取功能性便秘老年患者共50例,随机分为研究组(25例)行经络穴位贴敷联合制大黄、芒硝、厚朴粉治疗,对照组(25例)进行口服麻仁丸治疗,对比治疗前后的排便功能变化及用药安全性。结果:所有患者在经过治疗后,其排便功能的各项指标明显改善,并且相比对照组研究组的排便间隔时间、排变速度、排便难度、粪质评分均更低(P<0.05)。研究组患者的治疗总有效率92%高于对照组患者的64%,P<0.05。结论:临床采用经络穴位贴敷联合制大黄、芒硝、厚朴粉治疗老年功能性便秘效果显著,提高了患者的生活质量。

Comparison of efficacy between electroacupuncture and the combination of collateral bloodletting,cupping,and acupoint application for cervical spondylosis radiculopathy(CRS)

Objective To observe the efficacy of treating young patients with cervical spondylosis radiculopathy （CRS） by collateral bloodletting, cupping, and acupoint application. Methods Sixty-one CRS patients were randomly divided into an acupoint application group （group A, 31 cases） and an electroacupuncture group （group B, 30 cases）. Both sides of the spine and scapula were treated with collateral bloodletting, cupping, and acupoint application over Ashi points in group A. The following points received electroacupuncture in group B： Jiaji （夹脊 EX-B2）, Fengchi （风池 GB 20）, Jianjing （肩井 GB 21）, Jianyu （肩髃 LI 15）, Waiguan （外关 TE 5）, Houxi （后溪 SI 3） and Dazhui （大椎 GV 14）. Patients in the two groups were compared in terms of scores for total symptoms and signs, and the theraputic effect of each method was analyzed. Results Total score of symptoms and signs of the two groups were both more significantly improved compared to that before treatment （9.96 ± 2.02 vs 15.87 ± 1.84, P〈0.05 in group A; 10.02 ± 1.76 vs 13.59 ± 1.52, P〈0.05 in group B）. The differences in two groups before and after treatment were 5.91 ± 1.95 in group A, 3.53 ± 1.68 in group B, they were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. The total effective rate of group A [93.6% （29/31）] was better than that of group B [83.3% （25/30）], and the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Good therapeutic effects can be achieved in treating young CRS patients with collateral bloodletting, cupping, and acupoint application.