2002年4月15日,国际货币基金组织(IMF)首次以英文公布了中国统计数据文件,标志着中国正式成为IMF“数据公布通用系统”(General Data Dis-semination System,缩写为GDDS)的正式成员。我国加入GDDS是适应经济全球化、金融市场一体化的需...2002年4月15日,国际货币基金组织(IMF)首次以英文公布了中国统计数据文件,标志着中国正式成为IMF“数据公布通用系统”(General Data Dis-semination System,缩写为GDDS)的正式成员。我国加入GDDS是适应经济全球化、金融市场一体化的需要,也是我国进一步改革和扩大对外开放的需要。 一、GDDS的主要要求 (一)统计范围 GDDS将国民经济活动划分为5大经济部门:实际部门、财政部门、金融部门、对外部门和社会人口部门。对每一部门各选定一组能够反映其活动实绩和政策以及可以帮助理解经济发展和结构变化的最为重要的数据类别。系统提出了五大部门综合框架和相关的数据类别和指标编制、公布的目标,鼓励以适当的。展开更多
Our paper presents an interactive four-dimensional model for studying the long- and short-term development of the communication discipline with Israel serving as a case study： institutional-contextual, institutional-...Our paper presents an interactive four-dimensional model for studying the long- and short-term development of the communication discipline with Israel serving as a case study： institutional-contextual, institutional-in-field, intellectual-contextual, and intellectual-in-field. Our empirical analysis utilized personal interviews, archive documents, and statistical data. Four main processes were discerned： transition from integration to alienation between institutions of higher learning and the larger political and ideological context; a shift from Hebrew University Institute of Communication＇s institutional monopoly to a multiplicity of increasingly competitive communication schools/departments; transition from intellectual hegemony to limited intellectual diversity; and gradually improving status for the communication field among social science disciplines. Our case-study analysis validated the interactive relationship among the model＇s conceptual dimensions, calling for future cross-national comparisons.展开更多
文摘Our paper presents an interactive four-dimensional model for studying the long- and short-term development of the communication discipline with Israel serving as a case study： institutional-contextual, institutional-in-field, intellectual-contextual, and intellectual-in-field. Our empirical analysis utilized personal interviews, archive documents, and statistical data. Four main processes were discerned： transition from integration to alienation between institutions of higher learning and the larger political and ideological context; a shift from Hebrew University Institute of Communication＇s institutional monopoly to a multiplicity of increasingly competitive communication schools/departments; transition from intellectual hegemony to limited intellectual diversity; and gradually improving status for the communication field among social science disciplines. Our case-study analysis validated the interactive relationship among the model＇s conceptual dimensions, calling for future cross-national comparisons.
