历史有时候就像钟摆。20世纪五六十年代,在芝加哥大学法学院掀起了一场席卷美国法学界的"法律与经济"运动,致力于对各种法律规则和制度进行成本-收益分析,追求效率和财富最大化,主张市场自由和去监管。几十年过去了,美国法学...历史有时候就像钟摆。20世纪五六十年代,在芝加哥大学法学院掀起了一场席卷美国法学界的"法律与经济"运动,致力于对各种法律规则和制度进行成本-收益分析,追求效率和财富最大化,主张市场自由和去监管。几十年过去了,美国法学界又兴起了另一场运动,历史的钟摆似乎正在摆向相反的方向。2019年4月,耶鲁大学法学院发起了"法律与政治经济"(Law and Political Economy)倡议。展开更多
In recent years, Chinese scholars have made important progress in research on later Greek philosophy. Using current European and American work as a reference point, this article explores the differences and gaps betwe...In recent years, Chinese scholars have made important progress in research on later Greek philosophy. Using current European and American work as a reference point, this article explores the differences and gaps between foreign and Chinese scholars in this field of research. The author believes that on the question of the boundaries of later Greek philosophy, Chinese scholars have, through long years of exploration, come up with independent opinions and solutions that differ from those of their European and Ameriean counterparts, and that they have a better grasp of the distinctive features of later Greek philosophy. Their work, however, clearly falls short with regard to historical source material. As far as methodology is concerned, there is a clear tendency towards convergence between Chinese scholars and their foreign colleagues.展开更多
文摘历史有时候就像钟摆。20世纪五六十年代,在芝加哥大学法学院掀起了一场席卷美国法学界的"法律与经济"运动,致力于对各种法律规则和制度进行成本-收益分析,追求效率和财富最大化,主张市场自由和去监管。几十年过去了,美国法学界又兴起了另一场运动,历史的钟摆似乎正在摆向相反的方向。2019年4月,耶鲁大学法学院发起了"法律与政治经济"(Law and Political Economy)倡议。
基金financed by the Distinguished Professor Project of Zhejiang University
文摘In recent years, Chinese scholars have made important progress in research on later Greek philosophy. Using current European and American work as a reference point, this article explores the differences and gaps between foreign and Chinese scholars in this field of research. The author believes that on the question of the boundaries of later Greek philosophy, Chinese scholars have, through long years of exploration, come up with independent opinions and solutions that differ from those of their European and Ameriean counterparts, and that they have a better grasp of the distinctive features of later Greek philosophy. Their work, however, clearly falls short with regard to historical source material. As far as methodology is concerned, there is a clear tendency towards convergence between Chinese scholars and their foreign colleagues.
