The present paper is a brief review of the Luoyang Wangwan: An Archaeological Excavation Report (below called Report for short). The author believes that the first stage of Neolithic Wangwan I culture named in the Rep...The present paper is a brief review of the Luoyang Wangwan: An Archaeological Excavation Report (below called Report for short). The author believes that the first stage of Neolithic Wangwan I culture named in the Report should be further divided into two sub-stages corresponding to the Banpo and Miaodigou phases respectively of the Yangshao culture. Concerning the classification of the Neolithic Wangwan Ⅱ Culture remains, he agrees with the Report. As for the cultural nature of the Neolithic Wangwan Ⅲ remains, he does not subscribe to the view of the Report that they belong to the"'Sanliqiao type' of the Henan Longshan culture. " He assigns them to the “Wangwan type” of Central Plains Longshan culture or the “Wangwan Ⅲ culture.” Besides, he makes evaluation on other problems of the Report.展开更多
文摘The present paper is a brief review of the Luoyang Wangwan: An Archaeological Excavation Report (below called Report for short). The author believes that the first stage of Neolithic Wangwan I culture named in the Report should be further divided into two sub-stages corresponding to the Banpo and Miaodigou phases respectively of the Yangshao culture. Concerning the classification of the Neolithic Wangwan Ⅱ Culture remains, he agrees with the Report. As for the cultural nature of the Neolithic Wangwan Ⅲ remains, he does not subscribe to the view of the Report that they belong to the"'Sanliqiao type' of the Henan Longshan culture. " He assigns them to the “Wangwan type” of Central Plains Longshan culture or the “Wangwan Ⅲ culture.” Besides, he makes evaluation on other problems of the Report.
