目的:观察疏通矫正手法对痉挛型脑性瘫痪(以下简称痉挛型脑瘫)患儿粗大运动功能评估(gross motor function measure,GMFM)、痉挛肌群表面肌电图、日常生活能力、肌张力的影响。方法:136例痉挛型脑瘫患儿随机平均分为对照组和观察组。两...目的:观察疏通矫正手法对痉挛型脑性瘫痪(以下简称痉挛型脑瘫)患儿粗大运动功能评估(gross motor function measure,GMFM)、痉挛肌群表面肌电图、日常生活能力、肌张力的影响。方法:136例痉挛型脑瘫患儿随机平均分为对照组和观察组。两组患者均给予常规基础疗法;同时观察组患者给予疏通矫正手法治疗,对照组患者给予Bobath法及Vojta法治疗。两组均以4周为1个疗程,3个疗程后比较两组患者临床疗效、GMFM、痉挛肌群表面肌电图、日常生活能力、肌张力的变化。结果:治疗前,观察组GMFM总分、日常生活能力的Barthel指数、表面肌电图及肌张力与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后观察组GMFM总分、日常生活能力的Barthel指数、表面肌电图及肌张力与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:疏通矫正手法治疗儿童痉挛型脑瘫疗效显著。展开更多
Background:Stiffness is commonly assessed in relation to injury and athletic performance.The purpose of this research was to compare the validity and reliability of 3 in vivo methods of stiffness assessment using 1 c...Background:Stiffness is commonly assessed in relation to injury and athletic performance.The purpose of this research was to compare the validity and reliability of 3 in vivo methods of stiffness assessment using 1 cohort of participants.Methods:To determine inter-day reliability,15 female netballers were assessed for stiffness twice within 1 week using unilateral hopping(vertical stiffness),free oscillations of the calf,and myometry of various muscles of the triceps surae.To establish convergent construct validity,stiffness was compared to static and dynamic strength measurements.Results:Test–retest stiffness results revealed that vertical stiffness produced moderate to high reliability results and myometry presented moderate to very high reliability.In contrast,the free oscillation technique displayed low to moderate reliability.Vertical stiffness demonstrated a significa t correlation with rate of force development during a squat jump,whilst myometer stiffness measurements from 3 sites in the lower limb revealed significan correlations with isometric rate of force development.Further,significan negative correlations were evident between the eccentric utilisation ratio and various myometer stiffness results.No relationships were established between the free oscillation technique and any of the performance measurements.Conclusion:These results suggest that vertical stiffness and myometry are valid and reliable methods for assessing stiffness.展开更多
文摘目的:观察疏通矫正手法对痉挛型脑性瘫痪(以下简称痉挛型脑瘫)患儿粗大运动功能评估(gross motor function measure,GMFM)、痉挛肌群表面肌电图、日常生活能力、肌张力的影响。方法:136例痉挛型脑瘫患儿随机平均分为对照组和观察组。两组患者均给予常规基础疗法;同时观察组患者给予疏通矫正手法治疗,对照组患者给予Bobath法及Vojta法治疗。两组均以4周为1个疗程,3个疗程后比较两组患者临床疗效、GMFM、痉挛肌群表面肌电图、日常生活能力、肌张力的变化。结果:治疗前,观察组GMFM总分、日常生活能力的Barthel指数、表面肌电图及肌张力与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后观察组GMFM总分、日常生活能力的Barthel指数、表面肌电图及肌张力与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:疏通矫正手法治疗儿童痉挛型脑瘫疗效显著。
文摘Background:Stiffness is commonly assessed in relation to injury and athletic performance.The purpose of this research was to compare the validity and reliability of 3 in vivo methods of stiffness assessment using 1 cohort of participants.Methods:To determine inter-day reliability,15 female netballers were assessed for stiffness twice within 1 week using unilateral hopping(vertical stiffness),free oscillations of the calf,and myometry of various muscles of the triceps surae.To establish convergent construct validity,stiffness was compared to static and dynamic strength measurements.Results:Test–retest stiffness results revealed that vertical stiffness produced moderate to high reliability results and myometry presented moderate to very high reliability.In contrast,the free oscillation technique displayed low to moderate reliability.Vertical stiffness demonstrated a significa t correlation with rate of force development during a squat jump,whilst myometer stiffness measurements from 3 sites in the lower limb revealed significan correlations with isometric rate of force development.Further,significan negative correlations were evident between the eccentric utilisation ratio and various myometer stiffness results.No relationships were established between the free oscillation technique and any of the performance measurements.Conclusion:These results suggest that vertical stiffness and myometry are valid and reliable methods for assessing stiffness.