研究Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法在肝癌切除术中的应用效果。选择2010年6月—2015年5月接受肝癌切除术治疗的肝癌患者189例,按照肝门阻断方式患者分为A组(58例)、B组(62例)、C组(69例),3组患者性别、年龄、一般资料差异无统计学意...研究Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法在肝癌切除术中的应用效果。选择2010年6月—2015年5月接受肝癌切除术治疗的肝癌患者189例,按照肝门阻断方式患者分为A组(58例)、B组(62例)、C组(69例),3组患者性别、年龄、一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组行Pringle法,B组行半肝血流阻断法,C组行Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法。观察3组术中情况及术后肝功能和并发症等指标。3组术中出血量、术中输血量比较,A组显著高于B组、C组(P<0.05),B组显著高于C组(P<0.05)。B组术后7 d TBIL、AST、ALT显著低于A组,组间对应比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组术后3 d、7 d AST、ALT显著低于B组,组间对应比较,差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组、B组、C组术后并发症发生率分别为13.79%、6.45%、8.70%,3组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法应用于肝癌切除术可有效降低术中出血量,对肝功能影响小,术后并发症发生率低,值得应用于临床。展开更多
Objective To report our experience of retrograde hepatectomy in 244 cases of difficultly resected liver cancer. Methods Large, poor-exposure and inferior vena cava (IVC)-involving liver cancers that were difficult t...Objective To report our experience of retrograde hepatectomy in 244 cases of difficultly resected liver cancer. Methods Large, poor-exposure and inferior vena cava (IVC)-involving liver cancers that were difficult to remove by classical hepatectomy, have been resected successfully by retrograde hepatectomy combined with vascular surgical techniques in 244 patients (group A). Thirty one patients with similar circumstances undergoing classical hepatectomy duing the same period served as controls (group B). Results There were no perioperative mortalities in both groups. The comparison between group A and group B, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was 1290±998 ml versus 2286±1363 ml, post-operative pleural effusions occurred in 26/244 versus 10/31, ascites in 72/244 versus 19/31, moderate to severe jaundice in 14/244 versus 5/31, effusion in the operative area in 17/244 versus 7/31, subphrenic infection in 3/244 versus 1/31, bile leakage in 2/244 versus 1/31, wound infection in 3/244 versus 1/31, respectively. The time until ALT normalizaton in the groups A and B was 13.8±5.1 days and 18.9±8.9 days respectively. The difference between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Retrograde hepatectomy is a safe and effective method for difficultly resected liver cancer. Key words cancer - liver - liver surgery - retrograde展开更多
文摘研究Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法在肝癌切除术中的应用效果。选择2010年6月—2015年5月接受肝癌切除术治疗的肝癌患者189例,按照肝门阻断方式患者分为A组(58例)、B组(62例)、C组(69例),3组患者性别、年龄、一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组行Pringle法,B组行半肝血流阻断法,C组行Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法。观察3组术中情况及术后肝功能和并发症等指标。3组术中出血量、术中输血量比较,A组显著高于B组、C组(P<0.05),B组显著高于C组(P<0.05)。B组术后7 d TBIL、AST、ALT显著低于A组,组间对应比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组术后3 d、7 d AST、ALT显著低于B组,组间对应比较,差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组、B组、C组术后并发症发生率分别为13.79%、6.45%、8.70%,3组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Pringle法联合肝下下腔静脉阻断法应用于肝癌切除术可有效降低术中出血量,对肝功能影响小,术后并发症发生率低,值得应用于临床。
文摘Objective To report our experience of retrograde hepatectomy in 244 cases of difficultly resected liver cancer. Methods Large, poor-exposure and inferior vena cava (IVC)-involving liver cancers that were difficult to remove by classical hepatectomy, have been resected successfully by retrograde hepatectomy combined with vascular surgical techniques in 244 patients (group A). Thirty one patients with similar circumstances undergoing classical hepatectomy duing the same period served as controls (group B). Results There were no perioperative mortalities in both groups. The comparison between group A and group B, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was 1290±998 ml versus 2286±1363 ml, post-operative pleural effusions occurred in 26/244 versus 10/31, ascites in 72/244 versus 19/31, moderate to severe jaundice in 14/244 versus 5/31, effusion in the operative area in 17/244 versus 7/31, subphrenic infection in 3/244 versus 1/31, bile leakage in 2/244 versus 1/31, wound infection in 3/244 versus 1/31, respectively. The time until ALT normalizaton in the groups A and B was 13.8±5.1 days and 18.9±8.9 days respectively. The difference between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Retrograde hepatectomy is a safe and effective method for difficultly resected liver cancer. Key words cancer - liver - liver surgery - retrograde
