期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
水胶体标准敷料在胸、腹腔引流管中的应用 被引量:1
1
作者 段平 《中国医疗器械信息》 2018年第4期83-84,共2页
目的:比较纱布换药与水胶体标准敷料换药的优劣,进一步提升优质护理服务水平。方法:将50例胸腹腔置管患者随机分为研究组和对照组,各25例。对照组采用纱布换药,研究组采用多爱肤水胶体标准敷料换药。结果:研究组患者虽然在换药时间长于... 目的:比较纱布换药与水胶体标准敷料换药的优劣,进一步提升优质护理服务水平。方法:将50例胸腹腔置管患者随机分为研究组和对照组,各25例。对照组采用纱布换药,研究组采用多爱肤水胶体标准敷料换药。结果:研究组患者虽然在换药时间长于对照组,但无管道脱落、无感染、患者舒适度提高,平均换药费用降低,提高了满意度。结论:使用多爱肤水胶体标准敷料能提高护理质量,有效保障护理安全,可在临床中广泛推广应用。 展开更多
关键词 多爱肤水胶体标准敷料 胸、腹腔引流管 护理质量
下载PDF
改良置管固定法在老年患者胸腹腔引流术中的应用 被引量:4
2
作者 李俊芳 《中国医药导刊》 2013年第S1期231-232,共2页
胸、腹腔穿刺置管引流术便于引流出腹腔中存积的渗液、血水等,妥善固定胸、腹腔导管是成功引流胸、腹腔积液的关键[1]。传统固定方法由于受患者体位、自理能力等因素的影响,易导致导管脱落、固定部位渗液、感染等并发症。研究通过对我院... 胸、腹腔穿刺置管引流术便于引流出腹腔中存积的渗液、血水等,妥善固定胸、腹腔导管是成功引流胸、腹腔积液的关键[1]。传统固定方法由于受患者体位、自理能力等因素的影响,易导致导管脱落、固定部位渗液、感染等并发症。研究通过对我院2011年2月~2012年10月老年病二科60例胸、腹腔穿刺置管患者进行随机分组,对照组采用传统方法,观察组采用改良固定方法。经临床证实改良固定法效果优于传统方法。 展开更多
关键词 改良置管固定法 、腹腔引流 老年患者
下载PDF
ESOPHAGUS-STOMACH-ABDOMINAL WALL DRAINAGE FOR DELAYED INTRATHORACIC ESOHPAGEAL PERFORATION
3
作者 李国庆 单根法 +1 位作者 张辅贤 钟竑 《Journal of Shanghai Second Medical University(Foreign Language Edition)》 2003年第1期33-36,共4页
Objective To design a technique of esophagus-stomach-abdominal wall drainage for the de-layed intrathoracic esophageal perforation and to improve the therapeutic results. Methods Four patients were treated by this sim... Objective To design a technique of esophagus-stomach-abdominal wall drainage for the de-layed intrathoracic esophageal perforation and to improve the therapeutic results. Methods Four patients were treated by this simplified technique. There were 1 case of lower intrathoracic esophageal perforation to the left thorax , 1 high and 2 middle perforation to the right. This technique used two plastic tubes (chest tube) in a diameter about 1 .2cm . One tube served as an intercostal drainage tube to drain purulent effusion , the other was inserted abdominally through stomach to the esophagus about 10cm above the esophageal perforation. Results The four patients were treated successfully by the esophagus-stomach-abdominal wall drainage. There was no mortality or severe morbidity or complication. Hospitalizations were shortened. Conclusion This technique is simple, safe and effective. It may provide a more promising alternative method of treatment for delayed esophageal perforation, especially in the critically ill patients. The procedure can also be extended to deal with esophagus-stomach anastomotic leak. 展开更多
关键词 esophagus delayed intrathoracic esophageal perforation esophagus-stomach-abdominal wall drainage
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部