目的分析我国2011—2022年护理专业本科生人文关怀能力的变化趋势。方法通过计算机检索维普、万方医学数据库、中国知网、PubMed、Web of Science数据库,检索时限均为建库至2023年12月31日,整合归纳我国护理专业本科生人文关怀能力水平...目的分析我国2011—2022年护理专业本科生人文关怀能力的变化趋势。方法通过计算机检索维普、万方医学数据库、中国知网、PubMed、Web of Science数据库,检索时限均为建库至2023年12月31日,整合归纳我国护理专业本科生人文关怀能力水平调查类的原始文献,通过横断历史元分析对伴随时间推移的我国护理本科生人文关怀能力的变化趋势进行分析。结果调查年份对人文关怀能力中耐心维度及认知维度有显著预测作用(P<0.05)。经计算,我国护理专业本科生2011年人文关怀能力中的耐心维度均值M 2011为54.25,2022年耐心维度的均值M 2022为62.58。11年间,耐心维度的均值上升了8.33分,平均标准差(SD)为6.50,耐心维度的效果量(d)为1.28;我国护理专业本科生2011年人文关怀能力中勇气维度均值M 2011为62.13,2022年勇气维度的均值M 2022为52.32。在11年间,勇气维度均值下降了9.81分,SD为10.14,勇气维度d为0.97,结果表明2011—2022年间,我国护理专业本科生人文关怀能力中的耐心维度得分相比2011年上升了1.28个SD,属大效果量,而勇气维度得分相比2011年下降了0.97个SD,属大效果量。结论2011—2022年我国护理专业本科生的人文关怀耐心维度呈明显上升趋势,在今后应注重提升护理本科生人文认知及勇气水平,进一步提升我国护理专业本科生的人文关怀能力,以期为护理教育事业提供借鉴。展开更多
目的:探究某三甲医院老年科护士人文关怀能力现状及影响因素。方法:研究时间:2024年1月~2024年3月;研究对象:某三甲医院采用整群抽样方法,选取60名老年科病房护士开展问卷调查,问卷包括护士的一般资料以及人文关怀能力评估量表(CAI)。...目的:探究某三甲医院老年科护士人文关怀能力现状及影响因素。方法:研究时间:2024年1月~2024年3月;研究对象:某三甲医院采用整群抽样方法,选取60名老年科病房护士开展问卷调查,问卷包括护士的一般资料以及人文关怀能力评估量表(CAI)。对收集到的一般资料采用单因素方差分析,寻找影响老年科护士人文关怀能力的主要因素,并经多元线性回归分析确定独立影响因素。结果:老年科护士人文关怀能力总分为(173.1 ± 13.93)分,各维度得分分别为认知维度(72.08 ± 6.54)分,勇气维度(56.82 ± 8.52)分,耐心维度(44.2 ± 5.12)分。分析表明:不同的工龄、层级、职称、学历以及培训经历是影响老年科护士护理关怀能力的重要因素,学历是影响老年科护士护理关怀能力的主要因素。结论:老年科护士的各项能力都处于较低水平,有待进一步提高。对于老年护理人员的人文关怀水平可通过调查其工作环境、培训方式以及管理制度,并依据护士的具体情况制定相应的改善,提高老年科病房护士的护理关怀能力。Objective: This paper aims to explore the current situation and influencing factors of humanistic caring ability of nurses in geriatric department of a tertiary hospital. Methods: Research time: January 2024~March 2024;Subjects: A tertiary hospital selected 60 geriatric ward nurses for questionnaire survey using the whole group sampling method, which included general information of nurses and the Competence Assessment Inventory (CAI) of humanistic care. The general information collected was analyzed by one-way ANOVA to find out the main factors affecting geriatric nurses’ humanistic caring ability, and independent factors were determined by multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Total score of geriatric nurses’ humanistic caring ability was (173.1 ± 13.93), and the scores of each dimension were cognitive dimension (72.08 ± 6.54), courageous dimension (56.82 ± 8.52), and patient dimension (44.2 ± 5.12). The analysis showed that different length of service, hierarchy, professional title, education and training experience were important factors affecting the nursing caring abilities of geriatric nurses, and educational qualifications were the main factor influencing geriatric nurses’ nursing caring ability. Conclusion: All the competencies of geriatric nurses are at a low level and need to be further improved. The humanistic caring level of geriatric nursing staff can be improved by investigating their working environment, training methods and management system, and developing corresponding improvements based on the specific conditions of the nurses to improve the nursing caring ability of nurses in geriatric wards.展开更多
文摘目的:探究某三甲医院老年科护士人文关怀能力现状及影响因素。方法:研究时间:2024年1月~2024年3月;研究对象:某三甲医院采用整群抽样方法,选取60名老年科病房护士开展问卷调查,问卷包括护士的一般资料以及人文关怀能力评估量表(CAI)。对收集到的一般资料采用单因素方差分析,寻找影响老年科护士人文关怀能力的主要因素,并经多元线性回归分析确定独立影响因素。结果:老年科护士人文关怀能力总分为(173.1 ± 13.93)分,各维度得分分别为认知维度(72.08 ± 6.54)分,勇气维度(56.82 ± 8.52)分,耐心维度(44.2 ± 5.12)分。分析表明:不同的工龄、层级、职称、学历以及培训经历是影响老年科护士护理关怀能力的重要因素,学历是影响老年科护士护理关怀能力的主要因素。结论:老年科护士的各项能力都处于较低水平,有待进一步提高。对于老年护理人员的人文关怀水平可通过调查其工作环境、培训方式以及管理制度,并依据护士的具体情况制定相应的改善,提高老年科病房护士的护理关怀能力。Objective: This paper aims to explore the current situation and influencing factors of humanistic caring ability of nurses in geriatric department of a tertiary hospital. Methods: Research time: January 2024~March 2024;Subjects: A tertiary hospital selected 60 geriatric ward nurses for questionnaire survey using the whole group sampling method, which included general information of nurses and the Competence Assessment Inventory (CAI) of humanistic care. The general information collected was analyzed by one-way ANOVA to find out the main factors affecting geriatric nurses’ humanistic caring ability, and independent factors were determined by multiple linear regression analysis. Results: Total score of geriatric nurses’ humanistic caring ability was (173.1 ± 13.93), and the scores of each dimension were cognitive dimension (72.08 ± 6.54), courageous dimension (56.82 ± 8.52), and patient dimension (44.2 ± 5.12). The analysis showed that different length of service, hierarchy, professional title, education and training experience were important factors affecting the nursing caring abilities of geriatric nurses, and educational qualifications were the main factor influencing geriatric nurses’ nursing caring ability. Conclusion: All the competencies of geriatric nurses are at a low level and need to be further improved. The humanistic caring level of geriatric nursing staff can be improved by investigating their working environment, training methods and management system, and developing corresponding improvements based on the specific conditions of the nurses to improve the nursing caring ability of nurses in geriatric wards.