AIM： To summarize the clinical experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy at a single center. METHODS： Between November 2003 and March 2009, 78 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma （n = 39）, metastatic liver carcino...AIM： To summarize the clinical experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy at a single center. METHODS： Between November 2003 and March 2009, 78 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma （n = 39）, metastatic liver carcinoma （n = 10）, and benign liver neoplasms （n = 29） underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy in our unit. A retrospective analysis was done on the clinical outcomes of the 78 patients. RESULTS： The lesions were located in segments Ⅰ （n = 3）, Ⅱ （n = 16）, Ⅲ （n = 24）, Ⅳ （n = 11）, Ⅴ （n = ii）, Ⅵ （n = 9）, and Ⅷ （n = 4）. The lesion sizes ranged from 0.8 to 15 cm. The number of lesions was three （n = 4）, two （n = 8） and one （n = 66） in the study cohort. The surgical procedures included left hemi-hepatectomy （n = 7）, left lateral lobectomy （n = 14）, segmentectomy （n = 11）, local resection （n = 39）, and resection of metastatic liver lesions during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer （n = 7）. Laparoscopic liver resection was successful in all patients, with no conversion to open procedures. Only four patients received blood transfusion （400-800 mL）. There were no perioperative complications, such as bleeding and biliary leakage. The liver function of all patients recovered within 1 wk, and no liver failure occurred. CONCLUSION： Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible operation with minimal surgical trauma. It should be performed by a surgeon with sufficient experience in open hepatic resection and who is proficient in laparoscopy.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) .METHODS:From 2006 to January 2011,laparoscopic hepatectomies were performed on 30 cases of HCC at Northern...AIM:To investigate the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) .METHODS:From 2006 to January 2011,laparoscopic hepatectomies were performed on 30 cases of HCC at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital. During this sametime period,30 patients elected to undergo conventional open hepatectomy over laparoscopic hepatectomy at the time of informed consent. The degree of invasiveness and outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy compared to open hepatectomy for HCC were evaluated.RESULTS:Both groups presented with similar bloodloss amounts,operating times and complications. Patients in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group started walking and eating significantly earlier than those inthe open hepatectomy group,and these more rapid recoveries allowed for shorter hospitalizations. There were no significant differences between procedures insurvival rate.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic hepatectomy is beneficial for patient quality of life if the indications are appropriately based on preoperative liver function and the location and size of the HCC.展开更多
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (SRRSH) has developed a form of laparoscopic hepatectomy, resecting by curettage and suction. Such resection has been carried out successfully in 6 patients who had liver tumors. The results ...Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (SRRSH) has developed a form of laparoscopic hepatectomy, resecting by curettage and suction. Such resection has been carried out successfully in 6 patients who had liver tumors. The results are satisfactory. And after the operation, there is a very effective perioperative nursing ensuring the patient’s recovery.展开更多
Objective： The aim of our study was to retrospectively analyze 15 patients＇ clinical materials with laparoscopic resection of liver neoplasms. Methods： From December 2007, a total of 15 patients with liver neoplasm...Objective： The aim of our study was to retrospectively analyze 15 patients＇ clinical materials with laparoscopic resection of liver neoplasms. Methods： From December 2007, a total of 15 patients with liver neoplasms were performed with laparoscopic hepatectomy, and their clinical materials, perioperative dates, postoperative complications, postoperative recovery and short-term curative effects were analyzed and summarized respectively. Results： Laparoscopic hepatectomy （LH） were performed in 15 patients, including 1 case underwent laparoscopic hepatic left Iobectomy, 1 case of left lateral hepatectomy, 13 cases of partial liver resection. Fourteen cases of total laparoscopic liver resections for liver neoplasms, 1 case of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection of the tumor, there was no conversion to open approach. Of the 15 patients with liver neoplasms, 13 cases of hepatic neoplasms with the maximum diameter was 8 cm× 8 cm × 9 cm, 9 cases of the borderline micro hepatocellular carcinoma （MHCC） with the diameter not more than 2 cm, 3 cases of hepatic benign tumor. The mean operation time was （120 ± 30） min, and the intraoperative average hemorrhage was 100 mL, beginning to eat and get out of bed following 1-2 days of operation. The average postoperative hospitalization was 8 days, WBC, ALl＇, AST, albumin, bilirubin returned to normal after one week of operation. There were no postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, bile leakage or air embolism etc. Twelve patients with HCC were confirmed by postoperative pathology, 1 case of liver smooth muscle lipoma, 2 case of hepatic hemangioma. By one year of followed-up in 12 cases of HCC, the longest survival was 38 months, and no recurrence or death, 1 year survival rate was 100%. Conclusion： Among the choice of cases, the advantages of LH for liver neoplasms compared with open surgery were less trauma, faster recovery and less blood loss. it is safe and effective for choosing a reasonable surgical indication, especially for peripheral micro hepatocellular carcinoma.展开更多
Objective： Three mainstream techniques-laparoscopic hepatectomy （LH）, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation （pRFA）, and open hepatectomy （OH）--were compared in this study, in terms of their efficacies in the tre...Objective： Three mainstream techniques-laparoscopic hepatectomy （LH）, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation （pRFA）, and open hepatectomy （OH）--were compared in this study, in terms of their efficacies in the treat- ment of small hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC）. Methods： A comparative study was performed within a total of 94 patients diagnosed with small HCC in our hospital from 2005 to 2010, who underwent LH （28）, RFA （33）, or OH （33）. They had either a single tumor lesion of less than 5 cm or up to three nodules with diameters of less than 3 cm each. Outcomes were carefully evaluated throughout a 3-year follow-up interval and statistically interpreted. Results： The pRFA group had a significantly lower disease-free survival rate compared with the two surgical groups （P=0.001） and significantly shorter overall survival （P=-0.005）, while the LH group and the OH group had no difference in survival results. For patients younger than 60 years old, surgical approaches offered a better long-term overall survival prognosis （P=0.008）. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in overall survival for elderly patients （P=0.104）. Conclusions： Among patients with small HCC, LH may provide better curative effects than pRFA without increasing complication rates, pRFA leads to faster recurrence than surgical resections. LH has similar therapeutic effects to OH and causes less trauma. For patients younger than 60 years old, LH may be the best curative treatment. Elderly patients may choose either surgery or pRFA.展开更多
Objective： The liver hanging maneuver （LHM） is rarely applied in laparoscopic right hepatectomy （LRH） because of the difficulty encountered in retrohepatic tunnel （RT） dissection and tape positioning. Thus far ...Objective： The liver hanging maneuver （LHM） is rarely applied in laparoscopic right hepatectomy （LRH） because of the difficulty encountered in retrohepatic tunnel （RT） dissection and tape positioning. Thus far no report has detailed how to quickly and easily establish RT for laparoscopic LHM in LRH, nor has employment of the Goldfinger dissector to create a total RT been reported. This study＇s aim was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of establishing RT for laparoscopic LHM using the Goldfinger dissector in LRH. Methods： Between March 2015 and July 2015, five consecutive patients underwent LRH via the caudal approach with laparoscopic LHM. A five-step strategy using the Goldfinger dissector to establish RT for laparoscopic LHM was adopted. Perioperative data were analyzed. Results： The median age of patients was 58 （range, 51-65） years. Surgery was performed for one intrahepatic lithiasis and four hepatocellular carcinomas with a median size of 90 （40-150） mm. The median operative time was 320 （282-358） min with a median blood loss of 200 （200-600） ml. Laparoscopic LHM was achieved in a median of 31 （21-62） min, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 14 （9-16） d. No transfusion or conversion was required, and no severe liver-related morbidity or death was observed. Conclusions： The Goldfinger dissector is a useful instrument for the establishment of RT. A five-step strategy using the Goldfinger dissector can quickly and easily facilitate an RT for a laparoscopic LHM in LRH.展开更多
文摘AIM： To summarize the clinical experience of laparoscopic hepatectomy at a single center. METHODS： Between November 2003 and March 2009, 78 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma （n = 39）, metastatic liver carcinoma （n = 10）, and benign liver neoplasms （n = 29） underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy in our unit. A retrospective analysis was done on the clinical outcomes of the 78 patients. RESULTS： The lesions were located in segments Ⅰ （n = 3）, Ⅱ （n = 16）, Ⅲ （n = 24）, Ⅳ （n = 11）, Ⅴ （n = ii）, Ⅵ （n = 9）, and Ⅷ （n = 4）. The lesion sizes ranged from 0.8 to 15 cm. The number of lesions was three （n = 4）, two （n = 8） and one （n = 66） in the study cohort. The surgical procedures included left hemi-hepatectomy （n = 7）, left lateral lobectomy （n = 14）, segmentectomy （n = 11）, local resection （n = 39）, and resection of metastatic liver lesions during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer （n = 7）. Laparoscopic liver resection was successful in all patients, with no conversion to open procedures. Only four patients received blood transfusion （400-800 mL）. There were no perioperative complications, such as bleeding and biliary leakage. The liver function of all patients recovered within 1 wk, and no liver failure occurred. CONCLUSION： Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible operation with minimal surgical trauma. It should be performed by a surgeon with sufficient experience in open hepatic resection and who is proficient in laparoscopy.
文摘AIM:To investigate the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) .METHODS:From 2006 to January 2011,laparoscopic hepatectomies were performed on 30 cases of HCC at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital. During this sametime period,30 patients elected to undergo conventional open hepatectomy over laparoscopic hepatectomy at the time of informed consent. The degree of invasiveness and outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy compared to open hepatectomy for HCC were evaluated.RESULTS:Both groups presented with similar bloodloss amounts,operating times and complications. Patients in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group started walking and eating significantly earlier than those inthe open hepatectomy group,and these more rapid recoveries allowed for shorter hospitalizations. There were no significant differences between procedures insurvival rate.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic hepatectomy is beneficial for patient quality of life if the indications are appropriately based on preoperative liver function and the location and size of the HCC.
文摘Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (SRRSH) has developed a form of laparoscopic hepatectomy, resecting by curettage and suction. Such resection has been carried out successfully in 6 patients who had liver tumors. The results are satisfactory. And after the operation, there is a very effective perioperative nursing ensuring the patient’s recovery.
文摘Objective： The aim of our study was to retrospectively analyze 15 patients＇ clinical materials with laparoscopic resection of liver neoplasms. Methods： From December 2007, a total of 15 patients with liver neoplasms were performed with laparoscopic hepatectomy, and their clinical materials, perioperative dates, postoperative complications, postoperative recovery and short-term curative effects were analyzed and summarized respectively. Results： Laparoscopic hepatectomy （LH） were performed in 15 patients, including 1 case underwent laparoscopic hepatic left Iobectomy, 1 case of left lateral hepatectomy, 13 cases of partial liver resection. Fourteen cases of total laparoscopic liver resections for liver neoplasms, 1 case of hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection of the tumor, there was no conversion to open approach. Of the 15 patients with liver neoplasms, 13 cases of hepatic neoplasms with the maximum diameter was 8 cm× 8 cm × 9 cm, 9 cases of the borderline micro hepatocellular carcinoma （MHCC） with the diameter not more than 2 cm, 3 cases of hepatic benign tumor. The mean operation time was （120 ± 30） min, and the intraoperative average hemorrhage was 100 mL, beginning to eat and get out of bed following 1-2 days of operation. The average postoperative hospitalization was 8 days, WBC, ALl＇, AST, albumin, bilirubin returned to normal after one week of operation. There were no postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, bile leakage or air embolism etc. Twelve patients with HCC were confirmed by postoperative pathology, 1 case of liver smooth muscle lipoma, 2 case of hepatic hemangioma. By one year of followed-up in 12 cases of HCC, the longest survival was 38 months, and no recurrence or death, 1 year survival rate was 100%. Conclusion： Among the choice of cases, the advantages of LH for liver neoplasms compared with open surgery were less trauma, faster recovery and less blood loss. it is safe and effective for choosing a reasonable surgical indication, especially for peripheral micro hepatocellular carcinoma.
文摘Objective： Three mainstream techniques-laparoscopic hepatectomy （LH）, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation （pRFA）, and open hepatectomy （OH）--were compared in this study, in terms of their efficacies in the treat- ment of small hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC）. Methods： A comparative study was performed within a total of 94 patients diagnosed with small HCC in our hospital from 2005 to 2010, who underwent LH （28）, RFA （33）, or OH （33）. They had either a single tumor lesion of less than 5 cm or up to three nodules with diameters of less than 3 cm each. Outcomes were carefully evaluated throughout a 3-year follow-up interval and statistically interpreted. Results： The pRFA group had a significantly lower disease-free survival rate compared with the two surgical groups （P=0.001） and significantly shorter overall survival （P=-0.005）, while the LH group and the OH group had no difference in survival results. For patients younger than 60 years old, surgical approaches offered a better long-term overall survival prognosis （P=0.008）. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in overall survival for elderly patients （P=0.104）. Conclusions： Among patients with small HCC, LH may provide better curative effects than pRFA without increasing complication rates, pRFA leads to faster recurrence than surgical resections. LH has similar therapeutic effects to OH and causes less trauma. For patients younger than 60 years old, LH may be the best curative treatment. Elderly patients may choose either surgery or pRFA.
基金Project supported by the General Research Project of Medicine and Science of Zhejiang Province(Nos.2014KYB119 and 2015KYB221),China
文摘Objective： The liver hanging maneuver （LHM） is rarely applied in laparoscopic right hepatectomy （LRH） because of the difficulty encountered in retrohepatic tunnel （RT） dissection and tape positioning. Thus far no report has detailed how to quickly and easily establish RT for laparoscopic LHM in LRH, nor has employment of the Goldfinger dissector to create a total RT been reported. This study＇s aim was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of establishing RT for laparoscopic LHM using the Goldfinger dissector in LRH. Methods： Between March 2015 and July 2015, five consecutive patients underwent LRH via the caudal approach with laparoscopic LHM. A five-step strategy using the Goldfinger dissector to establish RT for laparoscopic LHM was adopted. Perioperative data were analyzed. Results： The median age of patients was 58 （range, 51-65） years. Surgery was performed for one intrahepatic lithiasis and four hepatocellular carcinomas with a median size of 90 （40-150） mm. The median operative time was 320 （282-358） min with a median blood loss of 200 （200-600） ml. Laparoscopic LHM was achieved in a median of 31 （21-62） min, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 14 （9-16） d. No transfusion or conversion was required, and no severe liver-related morbidity or death was observed. Conclusions： The Goldfinger dissector is a useful instrument for the establishment of RT. A five-step strategy using the Goldfinger dissector can quickly and easily facilitate an RT for a laparoscopic LHM in LRH.
