Objective：To observe the clinical effect and syndrome scores improvements of herbal cake-partitioned moxibustion（HPM） and ginger-partitioned moxibustion（GPM） in treating ulcerative colitis（UC）.Methods：A total ...Objective：To observe the clinical effect and syndrome scores improvements of herbal cake-partitioned moxibustion（HPM） and ginger-partitioned moxibustion（GPM） in treating ulcerative colitis（UC）.Methods：A total of 65 eligible cases were randomly divided into a HPM group（n=32） and a GPM group（n=33） according to their visiting order.Bilateral Tianshu（ST 25） and Dachangshu（BL 25） were selected for the HPM or the GPM treatment once daily,12 d as a treatment course with a 3-day interval,6 courses in all.The clinical effect,syndrome scale and Mayo scale were evaluated and compared between the two groups.Results：Of the 65 cases enrolled,2 cases dropped out in the HPM group and 3 cases dropped out in the GPM group,30 cases of each group finished the treatment courses.The total effective rate is 93.3% in HPM group and 86.7% in the GPM group,there was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups（P〉0.05）;there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in score evaluation of lasting time of abdominal pain and frequency of diarrhea,HPM is prior to GPM（P=0.032,P=0.044）.There are no statistical significant differences between the two groups in scores evaluation of general symptom,three main symptoms,quality of life（QOL）,frequency and severity of abdominal pain,times,and pattern of diarrhea（all P〉0.05）.There was a statistical significant difference in the improvement of Mayo score between the two groups,and HPM was superior to GPM（P=0.048）.Conclusion：HPM and GPM are both promising ways to treat UC,and the total effect is quite similar.HPM is superior to GPM in the improvement of lasting time of abdominal pain and frequency of diarrhea,and also the Mayo score.展开更多
Objective： To observe the therapeutic effects of needle warming moxibustion for chronic diarrhea. Methods： Two-hundred cases with chronic diarrhea were divided randomly into a treatment group and a control group. 10...Objective： To observe the therapeutic effects of needle warming moxibustion for chronic diarrhea. Methods： Two-hundred cases with chronic diarrhea were divided randomly into a treatment group and a control group. 100 cases in the treatment group were treated with needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints. 100 cases in the control group were treated by oral administration of Smecta. Results： The therapeutic results showed cure in 52 cases, remarkable effect in 34 cases, improvement in 14 cases and the total effective rate in 100.0% in the treatment group, and cure in 5 cases, remarkable effect in 23 cases, improvement in 33 cases, failure in 39 cases and the total effective rate in 61.0% in the control group. The comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints is better than oral administration of Smecta in the therapeutic effects.展开更多
Objective To observe the therapeutic efficacy of pricking needling at Sifeng （四缝 EX-UE10） in combination with Tuina in treating antibiotic-associated diarrhea （AAD） in infants. Methods According to random number...Objective To observe the therapeutic efficacy of pricking needling at Sifeng （四缝 EX-UE10） in combination with Tuina in treating antibiotic-associated diarrhea （AAD） in infants. Methods According to random number table, 82 patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 41 patients were included in each group. The patients in the two groups were not subjected to fasting diet; fluid replacement, correction on electrolyte disturbance, withdrawal of antibiotics and other symptomatic treatments were all carried out for them. The patients in the treatment group were simultaneously treated by using pricking needling at EX-UE 10 in combination with Tuina manipulation, while the patients in the control group were orally administered with Medilac Vita. Five days were considered as a treatment course for both groups, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated after a treatment course. Results the number of patients with concurrent symptoms in the treatment group were significantly less than that in the control group （P0.05）; the number of patients not showing leucopenia in the treatment group were significantly less than that in the control group （P0.05）; the total effective rate of 92.7% （38/41） in the treatment group was significantly higher than that of 73.2% （30/41） in the control group, and the difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of pricking needling at EX-UE 10 in combination with Tuina on the basis of conventional treatments is better than that of combination with Medilac Vita in treating AAD in infants, and it could rapidly improve systemic symptoms and indices of stool.展开更多
Objective To compare the effects between acupuncture combined with moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints and acupuncture on irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea （IBS-D）. Methods Sixty-four cases were randomly di...Objective To compare the effects between acupuncture combined with moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints and acupuncture on irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea （IBS-D）. Methods Sixty-four cases were randomly divided into an acupuncture and moxibustion group （n=32） and an acupuncture group （n=32）. Conventional acupuncture at Tiānshū （天枢 ST 14）, Zúsānlǐ （足三里 ST 36）, Gōngsūn （公孙 SP 4） and other acupoints was used in the two groups, and moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints was added in the acupuncture and moxibustion group. The treatment frequency was 5 times a week, and 4 weeks were a course. After 2 courses, the therapeutic effect was evaluated. Results The clinical symptom scores after treatment in two groups decreased obviously than those before treatment （both P〈0.01）. The cured and markedly effective rate in the acupuncture and moxibustion group was 87.5% （28/32）, and that in the acupuncture group was 37.5% （12/32）, so the effect in the acupuncture and moxibustion group was better than that in the acupuncture group （P〈0.01）. The improvement of all kinds of symptom scores in the acupuncture and moxibustion group was all better than that in the acupuncture group （all P〈0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of acupuncture combined with moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints on IBS-D is better than that of acupuncture.展开更多
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81173331,No.81303033,No.81473758)the 3-year Action Plan for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau(No.ZYSNXD-CC-ZDYJ053)+1 种基金National Basic Research Program of China(973 Program,No.2015CB554500)Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission(No.2014YZ052)~~
文摘Objective：To observe the clinical effect and syndrome scores improvements of herbal cake-partitioned moxibustion（HPM） and ginger-partitioned moxibustion（GPM） in treating ulcerative colitis（UC）.Methods：A total of 65 eligible cases were randomly divided into a HPM group（n=32） and a GPM group（n=33） according to their visiting order.Bilateral Tianshu（ST 25） and Dachangshu（BL 25） were selected for the HPM or the GPM treatment once daily,12 d as a treatment course with a 3-day interval,6 courses in all.The clinical effect,syndrome scale and Mayo scale were evaluated and compared between the two groups.Results：Of the 65 cases enrolled,2 cases dropped out in the HPM group and 3 cases dropped out in the GPM group,30 cases of each group finished the treatment courses.The total effective rate is 93.3% in HPM group and 86.7% in the GPM group,there was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups（P〉0.05）;there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in score evaluation of lasting time of abdominal pain and frequency of diarrhea,HPM is prior to GPM（P=0.032,P=0.044）.There are no statistical significant differences between the two groups in scores evaluation of general symptom,three main symptoms,quality of life（QOL）,frequency and severity of abdominal pain,times,and pattern of diarrhea（all P〉0.05）.There was a statistical significant difference in the improvement of Mayo score between the two groups,and HPM was superior to GPM（P=0.048）.Conclusion：HPM and GPM are both promising ways to treat UC,and the total effect is quite similar.HPM is superior to GPM in the improvement of lasting time of abdominal pain and frequency of diarrhea,and also the Mayo score.
文摘Objective： To observe the therapeutic effects of needle warming moxibustion for chronic diarrhea. Methods： Two-hundred cases with chronic diarrhea were divided randomly into a treatment group and a control group. 100 cases in the treatment group were treated with needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints. 100 cases in the control group were treated by oral administration of Smecta. Results： The therapeutic results showed cure in 52 cases, remarkable effect in 34 cases, improvement in 14 cases and the total effective rate in 100.0% in the treatment group, and cure in 5 cases, remarkable effect in 23 cases, improvement in 33 cases, failure in 39 cases and the total effective rate in 61.0% in the control group. The comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints is better than oral administration of Smecta in the therapeutic effects.
文摘Objective To observe the therapeutic efficacy of pricking needling at Sifeng （四缝 EX-UE10） in combination with Tuina in treating antibiotic-associated diarrhea （AAD） in infants. Methods According to random number table, 82 patients were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 41 patients were included in each group. The patients in the two groups were not subjected to fasting diet; fluid replacement, correction on electrolyte disturbance, withdrawal of antibiotics and other symptomatic treatments were all carried out for them. The patients in the treatment group were simultaneously treated by using pricking needling at EX-UE 10 in combination with Tuina manipulation, while the patients in the control group were orally administered with Medilac Vita. Five days were considered as a treatment course for both groups, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated after a treatment course. Results the number of patients with concurrent symptoms in the treatment group were significantly less than that in the control group （P0.05）; the number of patients not showing leucopenia in the treatment group were significantly less than that in the control group （P0.05）; the total effective rate of 92.7% （38/41） in the treatment group was significantly higher than that of 73.2% （30/41） in the control group, and the difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of pricking needling at EX-UE 10 in combination with Tuina on the basis of conventional treatments is better than that of combination with Medilac Vita in treating AAD in infants, and it could rapidly improve systemic symptoms and indices of stool.
文摘Objective To compare the effects between acupuncture combined with moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints and acupuncture on irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea （IBS-D）. Methods Sixty-four cases were randomly divided into an acupuncture and moxibustion group （n=32） and an acupuncture group （n=32）. Conventional acupuncture at Tiānshū （天枢 ST 14）, Zúsānlǐ （足三里 ST 36）, Gōngsūn （公孙 SP 4） and other acupoints was used in the two groups, and moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints was added in the acupuncture and moxibustion group. The treatment frequency was 5 times a week, and 4 weeks were a course. After 2 courses, the therapeutic effect was evaluated. Results The clinical symptom scores after treatment in two groups decreased obviously than those before treatment （both P〈0.01）. The cured and markedly effective rate in the acupuncture and moxibustion group was 87.5% （28/32）, and that in the acupuncture group was 37.5% （12/32）, so the effect in the acupuncture and moxibustion group was better than that in the acupuncture group （P〈0.01）. The improvement of all kinds of symptom scores in the acupuncture and moxibustion group was all better than that in the acupuncture group （all P〈0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of acupuncture combined with moxibustion on heat-sensitive acupoints on IBS-D is better than that of acupuncture.
