期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
自由解读——第12届卡塞尔文献展与CI设计 被引量:1
1
作者 杨志麟 《南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计)》 北大核心 2007年第4期72-73,共2页
第12届卡塞尔文献展CI设计,被符号成了一个强烈的印象——自由的、自由去看、自由解读。这也符合60年来卡塞尔文献展的一贯做法:"无固定主题,每一次都可以重新定义自己。"这种卓有远见的设计,给予展览最大的可能性,以保持文... 第12届卡塞尔文献展CI设计,被符号成了一个强烈的印象——自由的、自由去看、自由解读。这也符合60年来卡塞尔文献展的一贯做法:"无固定主题,每一次都可以重新定义自己。"这种卓有远见的设计,给予展览最大的可能性,以保持文献展经久不衰的前卫性。 展开更多
关键词 卡塞尔文献展 自由解读 CI设计
下载PDF
贝克特《默剧一》中的意象研究
2
作者 胡玉蓉 《美化生活》 2021年第9期68-70,共3页
萨缪尔·贝克特 (Samuel Beckett, 1906-1989) 的作品总是被认为极具“实验性”,因为他善于不断变化、创新其作品的呈现方式。为了增强剧作的张力,他创作了这部哑剧《默剧一》(Act Without Words Ⅰ , 1956),该剧中没有任何人物对话... 萨缪尔·贝克特 (Samuel Beckett, 1906-1989) 的作品总是被认为极具“实验性”,因为他善于不断变化、创新其作品的呈现方式。为了增强剧作的张力,他创作了这部哑剧《默剧一》(Act Without Words Ⅰ , 1956),该剧中没有任何人物对话,取而代之的是丰富而简洁的意象,传递给读者一种深刻而广泛的经验智慧。本文从静态意象和动态意象两个方面进行分析,指出贝克特意图实现对“话剧”( 对话为主,动作为主 ) 的突破,颠覆了对话与动作的主从关系。第一部分主要从静态的背景以及静态的抽象物体来讨论;第二部分主要从人和物体这两类意象之间的相互作用来分析。 展开更多
关键词 《默剧一》 意象 自由解读
下载PDF
The Confusion between Freedom and Fetter: Reading The Story of an Hour from New Criticism Perspective
3
作者 Zhang Long-yan 《International English Education Research》 2014年第12期4-4,共1页
The interpretation of The Story of an Hour has been a heated topic in literature study. Many people believeitcriticizes the oppressionon female from male society. However, this paper holds that, from the perspective o... The interpretation of The Story of an Hour has been a heated topic in literature study. Many people believeitcriticizes the oppressionon female from male society. However, this paper holds that, from the perspective of New Criticism, a work should be interpreted based on the text.Therefore,thispapersuggests the story is about the confusion between freedom and fetter and deals with the subtle and complicated living status of human being. 展开更多
关键词 The Story of an Hour Kate Chopin FREEDOM FETTER New Criticism
下载PDF
Cross the chasm from the immediate execution of death penalty to the death sentence with a reprieve --- Interpretation of the "not to execute immediately"
4
作者 Xiao Yuqin 《International English Education Research》 2015年第1期57-60,共4页
Retaining the death penalty and strict restricting the application of the death penalty is now a basic criminal policy in China, and from the judicial level, the key to the restriction of the death penalty is to study... Retaining the death penalty and strict restricting the application of the death penalty is now a basic criminal policy in China, and from the judicial level, the key to the restriction of the death penalty is to study what lenient sentencing discretion the criminal has to constitute "not to execute immediately" when he has reached the standard of the immediate execution of the death penalty, to cross the chasm from the immediate execution of the death penalty to the death sentence with a reprieve. The basic process of the sentencing is to establish a baseline punishment on the basis of the social harmfulness of the activities of the criminal, and then measure the profits and losses according to the offender's personal danger. Therefore, although the social harmfulness of the activities of the criminal reaches the standard of the "most heinous crimes", due to the existence of the fault of the victim, active compensation for the victim, and the motives of the small blames and other lenient sentencing discretions, the criminal's danger has not reached the degree of "flagrance". Apply the death sentence with a two-year reprieve and even the life imprisonment generally. If there are some strict sentencing discretions, such as "the crime means is extremely cruel", carefully consider the use of the immediate execution of the death penalty. Under the circumstances of the concurrence of the sentencing, carry on the overall consideration based on the comprehensive measurement of various circumstances of the sentencing. 展开更多
关键词 Limit the immediate execution of the death penalty the discretionary circumstances of sentencing individualization of the criminalpenalty
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部