宋人自编集的文体分类编次意义——以欧、苏、周、陆别集为例

以欧阳修、苏轼、周必大、陆游四家集为例,首先确定其自编过程、传统承续和内在关联。然后与唐代韩、柳集比较,分析其中的文体分类编次情况,从而发现一些承传与变化。宋集将行政公文单列为《内制集》《外制集》。从先赋后诗改为先诗后赋,反映赋、诗地位的变化。题跋大兴于宋,分类也从杂文类中分离出来单独编目。欧阳修《集古录跋尾》标志着跋文体在目录学意义上的独立。周必大《省斋文稿》首列"题跋"一目。陆游时代方大量使用《跋……》标题。宋四家集各种纪念文章的分类编目、标题名称、文章体例都趋于简明一致,韩集碑志文标题使用的许多别名不再出现。序、说、记、铭等文体更丰富更兴盛,皆单列目录。器物铭大兴于宋,名篇佳作迭出。

Network Intrusion Detection Model Based on Ensemble of Denoising Adversarial Autoencoder

Network security problems bring many imperceptible threats to the integrity of data and the reliability of device services,so proposing a network intrusion detection model with high reliability is of great research significance for network security.Due to the strong generalization of invalid features during training process,it is more difficult for single autoencoder intrusion detection model to obtain effective results.A network intrusion detection model based on the Ensemble of Denoising Adversarial Autoencoder(EDAAE)was proposed,which had higher accuracy and reliability compared to the traditional anomaly detection model.Using the adversarial learning idea of Adversarial Autoencoder(AAE),the discriminator module was added to the original model,and the encoder part was used as the generator.The distribution of the hidden space of the data generated by the encoder matched with the distribution of the original data.The generalization of the model to the invalid features was also reduced to improve the detection accuracy.At the same time,the denoising autoencoder and integrated operation was introduced to prevent overfitting in the adversarial learning process.Experiments on the CICIDS2018 traffic dataset showed that the proposed intrusion detection model achieves an Accuracy of 95.23%,which out performs traditional self-encoders and other existing intrusion detection models methods in terms of overall performance.

朱彝尊著述考略

朱彝尊(1629—1709)生活于明清易代,各种矛盾错综复杂的时代,是一位著名学者和藏书家.开创了“浙西词派”,在文学、史学、经学和目录学方面都有很深的造诣,一生著述丰富.《清史稿·朱彝尊传》对此评价说:“当时王士禛工诗,汪琬工文,毛奇龄工考据,独彝尊兼有众长”.今据杨谦《朱竹垞先生年谱》,将朱氏著述依年代先后考略如下:

白居易《花非花》试释

《全唐诗》卷435载白居易《花非花》一首,全文仅六句: 花非花,雾非雾。夜半来,天明去。来如春梦几多时,去似朝云无觅处。虽系长短句,但无词调,是诗,不是曲子词。它词语迷离恍惚,不易索解。嗜读古典诗歌的友好,每以见询。白居易在自编集子中,将此诗归入“感伤”一类,为我们理解此诗提供了一点线索。今试为铨释,就正同好。 “花非花”:用花比喻美丽女子,例子举不胜举。“非花”,意思是其美如花,但不是植物的花,而是美人。

论曹植赋的继承与创新

曹植少好诵辞赋,下笔成章,其自编集《前录自序》云赋七十八篇(《艺文类聚》卷五五引),现存者,包括残篇散句在内篇题标为赋的,《曹集铨评》所收有五十二篇。实际当不止此数,如属“七体”的《七启》,仿张衡《髑髅赋》所作的《髑髅说》,拟《九歌》而作的《九咏》,受《渔父》影响而写的《释愁文》等,虽无赋之名,却都是赋。曹植自言赋“所著繁多”(引同上),《前录》所载只是精选的篇目,他是否亲自编过《后录》,史文缺载。仅以现存赋观之,曹植已无愧于建安时代赋大家,在赋体发展史上是关键人物之一。他的赋,在题材内容、

宋代杜荀鹤诗集版本考述

杜荀鹤诗集的传本,最早应为其自编集本,只惜此本不传于后世,世人论及杜氏诗集之版本均只追溯至两宋。因而考察杜氏诗集的宋代传本在来源、时间及分卷上的差异情况,是对杜氏诗集版本流传诸问题进行整体研究不可或缺的组成部分。