护士专科药物学知识的继续教育与用药安全

目的加强护士专科药物学知识的继续教育,保障用药安全。方法有目标、有计划、系统地、适时地进行专科药物学知识的继续教育,保障给药安全,加强用药监护,及时发现药品不良反应。结果护士从被动盲从医嘱变为主动正确执行医嘱,安全给药的同时积极主动进行用药监护,最大限度地保障了用药安全。结论护士通过专科药物学知识的继续教育,避免药品不良事件的发生,及时发现药品不良反应,承担起用药安全的护理职责,展示护理专业的价值。

《说文解字》中的药物学知识

《说文解字》字典中记载了许多药物,主要集中在艸部。此外,在木部、虫部、鱼部、酉部、石部、金部等部首下,也收录了一些药物。本文对《说文》所载药物进行了粗略统计,并分类归纳,以揭示《说文》中载存的中药知识与资料信息。

蒙古族传统药物学知识及其研究价值

蒙古族传统药物学知识主要表现在药物的命名、药物资源的利用和生态环境的管理等方面,蒙古族传统药物学知识的研究价值包括蒙药的发掘和开发、民族传统食品和饮料的开发、民族特色药用植物产品的开发、传统生态经济和技术的应用、生物多样性保护、药用植物文化多样性与旅游业发展。

A survey of advanced medical students’ knowledge towards cancer pain management

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate advanced medical students' knowledge towards cancer pain management, and understand the effect of specialisms and duration of oncology rotation on the advanced medical students' cognitive level towards cancer pain management. Methods: Randomly selected the respondents from a medical school in Wuhan, China. The educational background of the respondents should belong to one of these conditions: (1) clinical master degree candidate; (2) clinical doctor degree candidate; (3) the sixth or seventh year of clinical medicine for seven years. The respondents should also spend more than one year on internship. The self-developed questionnaire papers were distributed to respondents in the unit of dorms selected randomly and recovered them immediately after they're finished. The categori- cal data were expressed at the form of frequency (rate or constituent ratio). Chi-square test was required only as needed. Results: The survey was anonymous. We distributed 300 papers, recovered 300 papers and weeded out 8 invalid papers. Finally there were 292 valid papers, and the valid recovery rate was 97.3%. The 96.7% of oncological medical students and 47.6% non-oncological medical students relied on patients' description for cancer pain assessments; 90.0% of oncological medical students and 53.0% of non-oncological medical students prescribed strong opioid drugs firstly for patients suffering severe cancer pain; only 24.1% of non-oncological medical students recognized that pethidine was not safe and effective to treat cancer pain, which was much lower than oncological medical students (90.0%); 73.3% of oncological medical students and 28.9% of non-oncological medical students had the correct impression of drug addiction; 85.5% of non-oncological medi- cal students worried about the drug addiction, while 60.0% of oncological medical students worried about the strict control over opioid. In respect of the details of cancer pain management, only 66.7% of oncological medical students recognized that there was no upper limit of opioid prescribed clinically, and 16.3% of oncological medical students recognized that there was no psychological dependence if patients took opioid orally. The 69.8% of the students from no-less-than-two-week group relied on patients' description for cancer pain assessments, 76.7% prescribed strong opioid drugs firstly for patients suffer- ing severe cancer pain, 69.8% recognized that pethidine was not safe and effective to treat cancer pain, and 55.8% had the correct impression of drug addiction. All of the data were higher than that in no-rotation group and that in less-than-two-week group. The 51.2% of the students from no-less-than-two-week worried about drug addiction, which was the lowest of all. Conclusion: The cognitive level of advanced medical students towards cancer pain management is so low that it could not satisfy the clinical requirement, especially for the non-oncological medical students and the students spending little time on oncology rotation. Though the oncological medical students know something about cancer pain treatment, they know little about the details.

李时珍修改医书

明代的李时珍被称为“药圣”,这是因为他对中医药学有着卓越的贡献。在他之前,前辈医者们已经撰写了很多医学著作。那是什么契机让李时珍决定重新整理药物学知识的呢?这个故事发生在他20岁那年。让我们一起来看看吧。