目的:评价适合临床使用的检测幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,Hp)的方法。方法:186例入选患者进行细菌培养,快速尿素酶,病理组织学,现症感染血清学抗体快速检测法(CIM-GLD’s Hp RT),细菌培养阳性或另3项中2项阳性认为有Hp感染。结果:...目的:评价适合临床使用的检测幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,Hp)的方法。方法:186例入选患者进行细菌培养,快速尿素酶,病理组织学,现症感染血清学抗体快速检测法(CIM-GLD’s Hp RT),细菌培养阳性或另3项中2项阳性认为有Hp感染。结果:细菌培养,CIM-GLD’s Hp RT,病理组织学,快速尿素酶法敏感性分别为89.32%、95.15%、91.26%、79.61%;特异性分别为97.59%、93.98%、95.18%、92.77%。结论:CIM-GLD’s Hp RT具有较高的准确诊断Hp感染的价值。展开更多
[Objective] This study aimed to compare the detection results of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus with test strips and agar gel immunodiffusion method. [Method] Antibodies against infectious bursal d...[Objective] This study aimed to compare the detection results of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus with test strips and agar gel immunodiffusion method. [Method] Antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus in chicken serum were detected using test strips developed in our laboratory, and the results were comparad^with that using traditional agar diffusion method. [Result] The comparative study of the two methods showed that the sensitivity of test strips was eight times over agar gel immunodiffusion; test strips showed higher detection rate in the deter- mination test of 216 clinical samples, with high specificity, easy preservation, and simple and rapid operation, thereby being more suitable for the monitoring of clinical antibodies. [Conclusion] Test strips could replace the existing serological methods, having great promotion and application value in antibody monitoring.展开更多
文摘目的:评价适合临床使用的检测幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,Hp)的方法。方法:186例入选患者进行细菌培养,快速尿素酶,病理组织学,现症感染血清学抗体快速检测法(CIM-GLD’s Hp RT),细菌培养阳性或另3项中2项阳性认为有Hp感染。结果:细菌培养,CIM-GLD’s Hp RT,病理组织学,快速尿素酶法敏感性分别为89.32%、95.15%、91.26%、79.61%;特异性分别为97.59%、93.98%、95.18%、92.77%。结论:CIM-GLD’s Hp RT具有较高的准确诊断Hp感染的价值。
文摘[Objective] This study aimed to compare the detection results of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus with test strips and agar gel immunodiffusion method. [Method] Antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus in chicken serum were detected using test strips developed in our laboratory, and the results were comparad^with that using traditional agar diffusion method. [Result] The comparative study of the two methods showed that the sensitivity of test strips was eight times over agar gel immunodiffusion; test strips showed higher detection rate in the deter- mination test of 216 clinical samples, with high specificity, easy preservation, and simple and rapid operation, thereby being more suitable for the monitoring of clinical antibodies. [Conclusion] Test strips could replace the existing serological methods, having great promotion and application value in antibody monitoring.
