期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
从“形而上学”到“行而上学”:康德哲学哥白尼式革命的实质 被引量:10
1
作者 邓安庆 《复旦学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期86-93,共8页
从"知识"以"对象"为转移到"对象"以"知识"为转移的这种所谓康德"哥白尼式革命"并非单纯地是一种认识论的革命,而是一种新的哲学思维态度的确立。"旧形而上学""旧&qu... 从"知识"以"对象"为转移到"对象"以"知识"为转移的这种所谓康德"哥白尼式革命"并非单纯地是一种认识论的革命,而是一种新的哲学思维态度的确立。"旧形而上学""旧"就"旧"在"自然的认识方式"上,误以为"形而上学"是一种超验的"知识论";新的哲学思维态度,知道"知识"的限度,使"超验的"知识成为不可能,而使"超越的"实践成为可能,在这一限度内,才为"信仰"留了地盘。这种信仰其实就是对实践理性之自由的信仰。因此,新的哲学态度下的Metaphysik不再是按照"自然倾向"去认识的"形而上学",而是以道德实践之自由(道德行动)为目的的"行而上学",这才是康德哲学所实现的"哥白尼式革命"的实质。 展开更多
关键词 哥白尼式革命 而上学 行而上学
下载PDF
从“形而上学”到“行而上学”——霍克海默社会哲学式的拯救之路
2
作者 李晓培 《延安大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第6期20-24,共5页
霍克海默从关注社会现实的维度出发,对形而上学的思维方式进行了社会哲学式的批判,实现了从"形而上学"到"行而上学"的范式转换。他对形而上学的批判蕴含着批判与拯救的双重维度。从关注人和解放人这一形而上学批判... 霍克海默从关注社会现实的维度出发,对形而上学的思维方式进行了社会哲学式的批判,实现了从"形而上学"到"行而上学"的范式转换。他对形而上学的批判蕴含着批判与拯救的双重维度。从关注人和解放人这一形而上学批判的终极目的出发,霍克海默把形而上学从天国拉回人间,实现了人本主义的回归;为唤醒被奴役民众的批判精神,霍克海默批判了形而上学肯定性的思维方式,实现了从"肯定"到"否定"的范式转换;为和传统的思维方式进行抗争,霍克海默批判了形而上学的形式逻辑特征,引入了辩证法的立场,实现了从"形式逻辑"到"辩证逻辑"的范式转换。 展开更多
关键词 而上学 行而上学 霍克海默 批判理论
下载PDF
“无”的主题——《老子》形上思想的深层意蕴 被引量:1
3
作者 马德邻 《中国哲学史》 CSSCI 2003年第3期47-53,共7页
《老子》形上学思想的主题是“无”。“无”是最具普遍性、深刻性、本原性的命题 ,“无”之规定不是任意的 ,在“混成”和“象”、“应当”、“言说”三个维度上被限定 ,具体展开为“道”形上学 (包括宇宙论 )、道德形上学和“言语”形... 《老子》形上学思想的主题是“无”。“无”是最具普遍性、深刻性、本原性的命题 ,“无”之规定不是任意的 ,在“混成”和“象”、“应当”、“言说”三个维度上被限定 ,具体展开为“道”形上学 (包括宇宙论 )、道德形上学和“言语”形上学 ,在中国哲学史构筑起一个相当完整的形上学体系。 展开更多
关键词 《老子》 “无” 行而上学思想 中国哲学 “道”
下载PDF
解构主义的开创性和局限性
4
作者 李荣华 唐文 郭雪蓉 《山西建筑》 2007年第11期24-25,共2页
介绍了解构主义反中心、反传统、反权威、颠覆行而上学的二元对立论等开创性的特色,并对其开创性意义进行了阐述,同时列举了一解构主义风格的代表作并予以分析,最后探讨了解构主义的局限性,对建筑风格和设计领域的革命具有重要的意义。
关键词 解构主义 行而上学 建筑风格 开创性
下载PDF
The Anti-metaphysical Turn in the Philosophy of Love (From the Cartesian Perinatai Perspective on Love to Diderot's Free Love in His Supplement to Bougainville's Journeys)
5
作者 Gabor Boros 《Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences》 2016年第3期365-377,共13页
In my paper, I show how the metaphysical aspect of the earlier concepts of love faded away through the disappearance of the essential references to God as the one, omniscient, omnipotent and benevolent being of the cr... In my paper, I show how the metaphysical aspect of the earlier concepts of love faded away through the disappearance of the essential references to God as the one, omniscient, omnipotent and benevolent being of the creation of nature, physis. Although in the seventeenth century, the structure of nature was conceived roughly in Epicurean terms, this concept was thought to be in need of a completion through a parallel system of being directed by teleological causality in one way or other. A synthesis of the Epicurean-scientific and the Christian teleological worldview was the main point in the philosophical agenda. The Enlightenment period meant a radical break between this soul-centred view and a new body-centred view most of the important thinkers were persuaded of. I exemplify this radically new look at the human being-in-the-world by presenting some ideas from ~ 50 of Diderot's "Thoughts on the interpretation of nature" (Pensdes sur l'interprdtation de la nature). Diderot attributes the faculties of feeling and thinking to all being from the tiniest molecules to the most complex beings, dispensing in this way with the typically seventeenth-century idea of God as the personal warrant of the pos- sibility of cognition. The sentient elements' j,~,~ng other corpuscles is no more governed by an omniscient creator but by the dynamism of the process itself. This boundless, creative, dynamic fluidity of being, this newly conceived nature in continual flux seemed to be captured best by such elastic faculties as imagination or sentiment. This is one of the reasons for the overall dominance of these faculties in the French and Scottish versions of the philosophy and theory of art of Enlight- enment. The consequences of all this in domain of the thinking on love will be presented by way of a reflection upon Diderot's ideas on the mixing of human andanimal species in the Dream of D'Alembert and on his ideas on "free love" in his Supplement to the voyage of Bougainville (1775/1796). 展开更多
关键词 Non-metaphysical concepts of nature Dominance of imagination overreason Sentient molecules Free love
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部