期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
简析动压式小煤柱支护技术要点 被引量:1
1
作者 罗文君 《现代工业经济和信息化》 2021年第1期140-141,共2页
针对工作面煤柱较少、煤柱和巷道顶板稳定性差、动压力对煤柱的影响较大等问题,分析了煤柱受力变形机理,提出了钻孔卸压措施,设计了巷道顶板加固支护方案。对采掘过程中的围岩变形进行监测,结果表明,该方案实施后,采掘面围岩变形较小,... 针对工作面煤柱较少、煤柱和巷道顶板稳定性差、动压力对煤柱的影响较大等问题,分析了煤柱受力变形机理,提出了钻孔卸压措施,设计了巷道顶板加固支护方案。对采掘过程中的围岩变形进行监测,结果表明,该方案实施后,采掘面围岩变形较小,煤柱稳定性大大提高。 展开更多
关键词 动压巷道 小煤柱 补强支撑
下载PDF
Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Retrofitted with Dissipative Steel Braces
2
作者 Luigi Di Samo Gaenato Manfredi 《Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture》 2010年第2期8-24,共17页
The present work discusses the outcomes of recent experimental tests and numerical simulations carried out on full scale reinforced concrete (RC) non-ductile frames retrofitted with dissipative steel braces, i.e. in... The present work discusses the outcomes of recent experimental tests and numerical simulations carried out on full scale reinforced concrete (RC) non-ductile frames retrofitted with dissipative steel braces, i.e. innovative buckling restrained braces (BRBs). Experimental tests were performed on two sample full scale RC framed buildings designed for gravity loads only. Such frames were subjected to cyclic pushovers to investigate their structural performance under different levels of earthquake loadings. The outcomes of the performed experimental tests demonstrate the efficiency and reliability of utilizing BRBs to retrofit non ductile RC frames. These outcomes were confirmed by refined non linear static and response history analyses carried out on an existing RC school framed building designed without seismic details and retrofitted with BRBs similar to those adopted for the tested full-scale frame. In such sample building the BRBs are placed along the perimeter of the existing frames to minimize the interruption of the functionality of the school and for easy of maintenance in the aftermath of major earthquake ground motions. The seismic performance assessment of the retrofitted structural system is illustrated in a detailed manner. Local and global response quantities are presented. The values of the global overstrength Ω for the case study vary between 2.14 and 2.54 for the retrofitted framed building. The translation ductility μ△-values range between 2.07 and 2.36. The response modification factor (or behaviour factor, namely R- or q-factor) is on average equal to 5.0. Additionally, the estimated maximum axial ductility of the BRBs is about 10. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of the adopted retrofitting scheme is emphasized and further needs for the application of BRBs are highlighted. 展开更多
关键词 Seismic retrofitting dissipative braces reinforced concrete frames response analysis earthquakes.
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部