本研究旨在考察不同专业大学生认知风格对英语阅读策略选择的影响。研究采用《镶嵌图形测试》和《大学生英语阅读策略测试量表》作为测量工具,对362名在校大学生进行调查,并通过SPSS.25.0进行数据分析,结果显示:1) 在理工科专业、艺术...本研究旨在考察不同专业大学生认知风格对英语阅读策略选择的影响。研究采用《镶嵌图形测试》和《大学生英语阅读策略测试量表》作为测量工具,对362名在校大学生进行调查,并通过SPSS.25.0进行数据分析,结果显示:1) 在理工科专业、艺术类专业的学生中,场独立型认知风格的学生占据多数,而文史类专业、医学、体育专业的学生更有场依存型认知风格的趋势;2) 认知风格在性别上存在着显著差异,男生更倾向于场独立型,女生更倾向于场依存型;3) 认知风格在英语阅读策略的选择上也存在显著差异,场独立型学生更擅长运用元认知策略,而场依存型学生在运用社会情感策略上更占优势;4) 不同专业背景的学生在英语阅读策略的元认知维度上存在着显著差异,体育专业的学生使用元认知策略的程度要显著低于其他专业。This study aims to examine the influence of cognitive styles on the choice of English reading strategies among university students from different majors. The Embedded Figures Test and the College Students’ English Reading Strategy Questionnaire were used as measurement tools to survey 362 university students. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 25.0, and the results indicate that: 1) Students with field-independent cognitive styles are predominant in science and engineering, as well as in arts majors, whereas students in humanities, medicine, and sports majors tend to have field-dependent cognitive styles;2) Cognitive styles show significant differences based on gender, with males more inclined towards field-independent styles and females more inclined towards field-dependent styles;3) Cognitive styles also show significant differences in the choice of English reading strategies, with field-independent students more adept at using meta-cognitive strategies, while field-dependent students excel in using social and affective strategies;4) There are significant differences in the use of meta-cognitive strategies among students from different majors, with students in sports majors using meta-cognitive strategies significantly less than those in other majors.展开更多
以往研究发现在成年期以上的被试认知风格会对风险决策有影响,但对于初中生团体关于风险决策的研究较少,并且对初中生风险偏好的影响因素研究也很少。本研究目的是探究青少年的认知风格对风险决策的影响。选取12~19岁的初、高中生为被试...以往研究发现在成年期以上的被试认知风格会对风险决策有影响,但对于初中生团体关于风险决策的研究较少,并且对初中生风险偏好的影响因素研究也很少。本研究目的是探究青少年的认知风格对风险决策的影响。选取12~19岁的初、高中生为被试,通过风险偏好问卷、镶嵌图形测验和气球模拟风险决策任务。研究发现:在青少年被试中,认知风格之间不存在性别差异,但是随着年龄的增长,认知风格差异显著。在气球模拟风险决策任务中,不同认知风格被试的BART值差异不显著,不同认知风格被试的吹爆气球个数差异也不显著。研究结果阐述青少年的心理分化水平是逐渐升高,但其对于冒险行为的影响不大,这对进一步探究初中生的冒险行为机制具有一定的启示意义。Previous studies have found that the cognitive style of participants above adulthood has an impact on risk decision-making, but there are few studies on the risk decision-making of junior high school students, and there are few studies on the influencing factors of risk preference among junior high school students. The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of adolescents' cognitive style on risk decision-making. Middle and high school students aged 12~19 were selected as the subjects to get the risk preference questionnaire, mosaic pattern test and balloon simulated risk decision-making task. The results showed that there was no gender difference between cognitive styles among adolescent subjects, but there were significant differences in cognitive styles with age. There was no significant difference in the BART value of participants with different cognitive styles and the number of balloons with different cognitive styles. The results show that the level of psychological differentiation of adolescents is gradually increasing, but it has little effect on risk-taking behavior, which has certain implications for further exploring the mechanism of risk-taking behavior among junior high school students.展开更多
文摘本研究旨在考察不同专业大学生认知风格对英语阅读策略选择的影响。研究采用《镶嵌图形测试》和《大学生英语阅读策略测试量表》作为测量工具,对362名在校大学生进行调查,并通过SPSS.25.0进行数据分析,结果显示:1) 在理工科专业、艺术类专业的学生中,场独立型认知风格的学生占据多数,而文史类专业、医学、体育专业的学生更有场依存型认知风格的趋势;2) 认知风格在性别上存在着显著差异,男生更倾向于场独立型,女生更倾向于场依存型;3) 认知风格在英语阅读策略的选择上也存在显著差异,场独立型学生更擅长运用元认知策略,而场依存型学生在运用社会情感策略上更占优势;4) 不同专业背景的学生在英语阅读策略的元认知维度上存在着显著差异,体育专业的学生使用元认知策略的程度要显著低于其他专业。This study aims to examine the influence of cognitive styles on the choice of English reading strategies among university students from different majors. The Embedded Figures Test and the College Students’ English Reading Strategy Questionnaire were used as measurement tools to survey 362 university students. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 25.0, and the results indicate that: 1) Students with field-independent cognitive styles are predominant in science and engineering, as well as in arts majors, whereas students in humanities, medicine, and sports majors tend to have field-dependent cognitive styles;2) Cognitive styles show significant differences based on gender, with males more inclined towards field-independent styles and females more inclined towards field-dependent styles;3) Cognitive styles also show significant differences in the choice of English reading strategies, with field-independent students more adept at using meta-cognitive strategies, while field-dependent students excel in using social and affective strategies;4) There are significant differences in the use of meta-cognitive strategies among students from different majors, with students in sports majors using meta-cognitive strategies significantly less than those in other majors.
文摘以往研究发现在成年期以上的被试认知风格会对风险决策有影响,但对于初中生团体关于风险决策的研究较少,并且对初中生风险偏好的影响因素研究也很少。本研究目的是探究青少年的认知风格对风险决策的影响。选取12~19岁的初、高中生为被试,通过风险偏好问卷、镶嵌图形测验和气球模拟风险决策任务。研究发现:在青少年被试中,认知风格之间不存在性别差异,但是随着年龄的增长,认知风格差异显著。在气球模拟风险决策任务中,不同认知风格被试的BART值差异不显著,不同认知风格被试的吹爆气球个数差异也不显著。研究结果阐述青少年的心理分化水平是逐渐升高,但其对于冒险行为的影响不大,这对进一步探究初中生的冒险行为机制具有一定的启示意义。Previous studies have found that the cognitive style of participants above adulthood has an impact on risk decision-making, but there are few studies on the risk decision-making of junior high school students, and there are few studies on the influencing factors of risk preference among junior high school students. The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of adolescents' cognitive style on risk decision-making. Middle and high school students aged 12~19 were selected as the subjects to get the risk preference questionnaire, mosaic pattern test and balloon simulated risk decision-making task. The results showed that there was no gender difference between cognitive styles among adolescent subjects, but there were significant differences in cognitive styles with age. There was no significant difference in the BART value of participants with different cognitive styles and the number of balloons with different cognitive styles. The results show that the level of psychological differentiation of adolescents is gradually increasing, but it has little effect on risk-taking behavior, which has certain implications for further exploring the mechanism of risk-taking behavior among junior high school students.