期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
《周礼》八议制度源流考论
1
作者 吕川 《法律史评论》 2023年第1期79-92,共14页
《周礼》“八辟之法”是西周以后议刑制度深入发展的结果。西周早期提出的明德慎刑旨在通过宽缓赦宥以展示政德,西周中期确立刑中为议刑的内在价值。孔孟融合了这两种议刑的原则,对议刑加以道德化与形而上的反思。议刑是自我关涉与伦理... 《周礼》“八辟之法”是西周以后议刑制度深入发展的结果。西周早期提出的明德慎刑旨在通过宽缓赦宥以展示政德,西周中期确立刑中为议刑的内在价值。孔孟融合了这两种议刑的原则,对议刑加以道德化与形而上的反思。议刑是自我关涉与伦理权衡的德性实践。它不仅意味着宽缓哀矜,更要合于道体,是故迅猛刚烈的决刑亦可许以为得中。战国晚期的《周礼》吸收了学术界法思想成果,通过制度化的方式明确规定议刑的主体、对象及内容,形成了八议的制度安排。宽缓之道的八议制度在刑事法中处于辅助性地位,显示出对王权的规范与限制。从议刑到八议的发展适应了西周以后的社会变迁,体现了政治层面由政道向治道的转变,亦展现了刑罚自由主义向法定主义的演变。 展开更多
关键词 议刑 思想源流 治道
下载PDF
从纵囚的论争看唐宋法制的宽严 被引量:3
2
作者 朱德魁 《贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 1987年第4期17-23,共7页
我国统一的封建法律制度始于战国,经过秦汉魏晋南北朝,到隋唐一大变,到宋又一大变。秦的时间很短,法律异常严酷;汉以秦为鉴,渐趋宽缓;而唐则是我国历史上法制最为宽缓的朝代;到宋朝转向苛严;元、明、清均极严酷。而赵宋王朝则是我国封... 我国统一的封建法律制度始于战国,经过秦汉魏晋南北朝,到隋唐一大变,到宋又一大变。秦的时间很短,法律异常严酷;汉以秦为鉴,渐趋宽缓;而唐则是我国历史上法制最为宽缓的朝代;到宋朝转向苛严;元、明、清均极严酷。而赵宋王朝则是我国封建社会中后期严刑酷法的始作俑者。 展开更多
关键词 慎杀 法志 赵宋王朝 盗贼重法 李世民 三复奏 五复奏 决事比 《宋统》 议刑
下载PDF
Sentencing Recommendations,Anchoring Effect and Fairness in Criminal Justice——An Empirical Study Based on a Sample of 520 Sentences in K City 被引量:5
3
作者 林喜芬 马勇 黄德远 《Social Sciences in China》 2018年第3期149-170,共22页
The anchoring effect is a powerful and widespread cognitive phenomenon in the decision-making field.Our quantitative analysis of a sample of 520 sentences indicates that the sentencing recommendation of the public pro... The anchoring effect is a powerful and widespread cognitive phenomenon in the decision-making field.Our quantitative analysis of a sample of 520 sentences indicates that the sentencing recommendation of the public procuratorate has a marked influence upon the court's sentencing judgment.That is,whether we are investigating the freedom penalty,the fine penalty or the term of probation imposed by the judge,we find that the anchoring effect does exist.In addition,a change in the court conviction or in the trial sentencing circumstances and the availability of a defense lawyer may weaken the anchoring effect of the procuratorate's sentencing recommendations.As a form of cognitive bias,the presence of the anchoring effect in the area of sentencing further highlights the necessity of applying analyses based on legal realism to the field of criminal justice in China;and at the institutional level,it demands that judges adopt corresponding arrangements to ensure the impartial exercise of discretion. 展开更多
关键词 sentencing recommendations anchoring effect DISCRETION judicial fairness
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部