本书的英文名为A Semantic and Pragmatic Model ofLexical and Grammatical Aspect,是美国Garland Publishing公司1997年出版的语言学优秀学位论文系列中的一本,是作者M.B.Olsen根据1996年在美国Northwestern University完成的博士论...本书的英文名为A Semantic and Pragmatic Model ofLexical and Grammatical Aspect,是美国Garland Publishing公司1997年出版的语言学优秀学位论文系列中的一本,是作者M.B.Olsen根据1996年在美国Northwestern University完成的博士论文改写而成的.全书正文加附录、文献和索引共325页,共七章:(1)前言;(2)词汇体;(3)语法体;(4)时;(5)英语的时和体;(6)古希腊共同语(Koine Greek)的时和体;(7)总结.该书是在语义特征缺值对立(privative opposition)而不是等值对立(equipollentopposition)的基础上,对词汇体、语法体和时的语义作了明确的区分,并且把语用因素系统地引入到对时体的解释之中,从而在Comrie(1976,1985)和Smith(1991)的基础上把时和体的理论研究又深入了一步.本文依次介绍前四章的主要观点并予以适当的评议,最后有一个总的评价.展开更多
Based on the Self-organizing Model of Bilingual Processing (SOMBIP) proposed by Li & Farkas (2002), this paper has aimed at exploring whether L2 mental lexicon undergoes a reorganizational process through word ass...Based on the Self-organizing Model of Bilingual Processing (SOMBIP) proposed by Li & Farkas (2002), this paper has aimed at exploring whether L2 mental lexicon undergoes a reorganizational process through word association tests on learners of different language proficiency. The results show that response types vary greatly among the three groups. Of all the responses elicited among beginners, responses of non-relationship type and phonological type take up the leading part. As to the responses made by inter...展开更多
文摘本书的英文名为A Semantic and Pragmatic Model ofLexical and Grammatical Aspect,是美国Garland Publishing公司1997年出版的语言学优秀学位论文系列中的一本,是作者M.B.Olsen根据1996年在美国Northwestern University完成的博士论文改写而成的.全书正文加附录、文献和索引共325页,共七章:(1)前言;(2)词汇体;(3)语法体;(4)时;(5)英语的时和体;(6)古希腊共同语(Koine Greek)的时和体;(7)总结.该书是在语义特征缺值对立(privative opposition)而不是等值对立(equipollentopposition)的基础上,对词汇体、语法体和时的语义作了明确的区分,并且把语用因素系统地引入到对时体的解释之中,从而在Comrie(1976,1985)和Smith(1991)的基础上把时和体的理论研究又深入了一步.本文依次介绍前四章的主要观点并予以适当的评议,最后有一个总的评价.
文摘Based on the Self-organizing Model of Bilingual Processing (SOMBIP) proposed by Li & Farkas (2002), this paper has aimed at exploring whether L2 mental lexicon undergoes a reorganizational process through word association tests on learners of different language proficiency. The results show that response types vary greatly among the three groups. Of all the responses elicited among beginners, responses of non-relationship type and phonological type take up the leading part. As to the responses made by inter...