生成语法和构式语法互洽之可能——以词汇—构式语用学视域的反义歧义分析为例

尝试从形式派的转换生成语法和功能派的构式语法这两个不同角度例析反义歧义现象,发现各自解释之缺憾并指出两派在分析中表现出学理和运作的相通性,而且都需要语用干涉才能更好地呈现诸如反义歧义句之深层歧义发生机制及解读程序。认为生成学派和认知学派解释句子的视角和方法各有千秋,若能联袂互助则可望为“欠规则”的现代汉语句子的理解提供新方法,而打通音、形、义、效关系的“词汇—构式语用学”便是两派互洽的契机。在该模式下,形式派和功能派对汉语(及其他语言)反义歧义句及更多类型语句或构式的生成和解读进行解释,分则互补互利,合则包容互洽,既保留了各派的核心优势,又有语用干涉,可望抵达更具解释力的语言学路径。

浅谈倒装句的汉语文化语用因素研究

传统语法历来认为汉语语法的特点之一是语序，不同的语序会形成千变万化的句型，现代汉语倒装句就是运用语序的变化形成的一种实际交际句型．作为一种变式句。它在日常言语交际和文学作品中大量运用,而语言学界历来对倒装句的研究从静态分析较多，较少涉及倒装句的动态研究。以汉语文化语用学”三带一”理论为理论依据，以语境干涉、附着符号束和智力干涉三个文化语用因素作为切入点，分析几种典型的倒装句型，进而探求倒装句的汉语文化语用价值。

The Principle of Non-interference and its Application in Practices of Contemporary International Law

The principle of non-interference is that sovereign states shall not inter- vene in each other＇s internal affairs. It is the general principle of contemporary international law that the non-interference in each other＇s internal affairs is based on the respect for states＇ sovereignty and territorial integration, which governs the relations between states in regard to their rights and obligations. It has been estab- lished as the general principle of international law or customary law in compliance with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. Nevertheless, its application depends on the determination of the matter in question within the domestic juris- diction and of the applicable international laws accordingly. It was and is still controversial in practices of international law to make such determination. This article focuses on the analysis of the principle of non-interference and its relation with the determination of domestic affairs, the relation between the principle of non- interference and the R2P, as well as the recent institutional development of global protection for human rights such as the HRC related to domestic affairs.