Objective： The aim of this study was to compare bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） with IMRT without entering pelvic bone marrow as a planning constraint in the treatment of cervical cancer...Objective： The aim of this study was to compare bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） with IMRT without entering pelvic bone marrow as a planning constraint in the treatment of cervical cancer after hysterectomy. Methods： For a cohort of 10 patients, bone marrow-sparing IMRT and routine IMRT planning were designed. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy/1.8 Gy/25f, 95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Doses were computed with a commercially available treatment planning system （TPS） using convolution/superimposition （CS） algorithm. Plans were compared according to dose-volume histogram （DVH） analysis in terms of planning target volume （PTV） homogeneity and conformity indices （HI and CI） as well as organs at risk （OARs） dose and volume parameters. Results： Bone marrow-sparing IMRT had an vantages over routine IMRT in terms of CI, but inferior to the latter for HI. Compared with routine IMRT, V5, Vl0, V20, V30, V40 of pelvic bone marrow of bone marrow-sparing IMRT reduced by 1.81%, 8.61%, 31.81%, 29.50%, 28.29%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between bone marrow-sparing IMRT and routine IMRT in terms of small bowel, bladder and rectum. Conclusion： For patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy, bone marrowsparing IMRT reduced the pelvic bone marrow volume irradiated at all dose levels and might be conducive to preventing the occurrence of acute bone marrow toxicity.展开更多
OBJECTIVE To analyze the therapeutic effects and side effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） with different fractionated doses in treating astrocytoma.METHODS During a period from October 2001 to Decemb...OBJECTIVE To analyze the therapeutic effects and side effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） with different fractionated doses in treating astrocytoma.METHODS During a period from October 2001 to December 2006, 58 patients with astrocytoma were treated using IMRT. Based on the World Health Organization （WHO） classification, 32 of the 58 cases were grade-Ⅱ, 20 grade-Ⅲ and 6 grade-IV （glioblastoma multiforme, GBM）. Thirty-two of the 58 patients （3 with grade IV, 11 with grade Ⅲ, and the other 18 with grade II who were over 40 years） were treated with hyperfractionated IMRT （Hyper Fr IMRT）, and the other 26 patients were treated with standard fractionated IMRT （St Fr IMRT）.RESULTS The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival （OS） rates were respectively 86%, 52%, and 45%, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year progression-free survival （PFS） rates were respectively 77%, 38%, and 25%. Using an analytical hierarchy process it was shown that concerning the patients with grade II astrocytoma classified based on WHO grading, the therapeutic effect was much better in the group of Hyper Fr IMRT than in the St Fr IMRT group. There was no statistical significance of the differences in the OS and PFS rates between the 2 groups （P = 0.049 and P = 0.006）. The OS and PFS rates of the patients with grade-III astrocytoma were both higher in the group with Hyper Fr IMRT than in the St Fr IMRT group. However, there was no statistical significance of the differences between the 2 groups. Advanced RTOG grade-Ⅲ（radiation therapy oncology group, RTOG） neurotoxicity occurred only in 1 of the cases.CONCLUSION Compared with the St Fr IMRT, the Hyper Fr IMRT may help to prolong the survival of patients with astrocytoma.展开更多
文摘Objective： The aim of this study was to compare bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） with IMRT without entering pelvic bone marrow as a planning constraint in the treatment of cervical cancer after hysterectomy. Methods： For a cohort of 10 patients, bone marrow-sparing IMRT and routine IMRT planning were designed. The prescribed dose was 45 Gy/1.8 Gy/25f, 95% of the planning target volume received this dose. Doses were computed with a commercially available treatment planning system （TPS） using convolution/superimposition （CS） algorithm. Plans were compared according to dose-volume histogram （DVH） analysis in terms of planning target volume （PTV） homogeneity and conformity indices （HI and CI） as well as organs at risk （OARs） dose and volume parameters. Results： Bone marrow-sparing IMRT had an vantages over routine IMRT in terms of CI, but inferior to the latter for HI. Compared with routine IMRT, V5, Vl0, V20, V30, V40 of pelvic bone marrow of bone marrow-sparing IMRT reduced by 1.81%, 8.61%, 31.81%, 29.50%, 28.29%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between bone marrow-sparing IMRT and routine IMRT in terms of small bowel, bladder and rectum. Conclusion： For patients with cervical cancer after hysterectomy, bone marrowsparing IMRT reduced the pelvic bone marrow volume irradiated at all dose levels and might be conducive to preventing the occurrence of acute bone marrow toxicity.
文摘OBJECTIVE To analyze the therapeutic effects and side effects of intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） with different fractionated doses in treating astrocytoma.METHODS During a period from October 2001 to December 2006, 58 patients with astrocytoma were treated using IMRT. Based on the World Health Organization （WHO） classification, 32 of the 58 cases were grade-Ⅱ, 20 grade-Ⅲ and 6 grade-IV （glioblastoma multiforme, GBM）. Thirty-two of the 58 patients （3 with grade IV, 11 with grade Ⅲ, and the other 18 with grade II who were over 40 years） were treated with hyperfractionated IMRT （Hyper Fr IMRT）, and the other 26 patients were treated with standard fractionated IMRT （St Fr IMRT）.RESULTS The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival （OS） rates were respectively 86%, 52%, and 45%, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year progression-free survival （PFS） rates were respectively 77%, 38%, and 25%. Using an analytical hierarchy process it was shown that concerning the patients with grade II astrocytoma classified based on WHO grading, the therapeutic effect was much better in the group of Hyper Fr IMRT than in the St Fr IMRT group. There was no statistical significance of the differences in the OS and PFS rates between the 2 groups （P = 0.049 and P = 0.006）. The OS and PFS rates of the patients with grade-III astrocytoma were both higher in the group with Hyper Fr IMRT than in the St Fr IMRT group. However, there was no statistical significance of the differences between the 2 groups. Advanced RTOG grade-Ⅲ（radiation therapy oncology group, RTOG） neurotoxicity occurred only in 1 of the cases.CONCLUSION Compared with the St Fr IMRT, the Hyper Fr IMRT may help to prolong the survival of patients with astrocytoma.
